Liberal capitalism and family values and anti racism and anti environmentalism and war mongering? How are these cohesive? Cause it's the opposite of the libs

Gained in the senate, even

It’s really commonly thrown around that the Republicans need to change if they want to win another election. It’s very true, I’m sure we disagree what that change needs to be though.

Haha oops found more democrat ballots in a car in the Fort Lauderdale airport parking lot

ya that was just nonsnse

They aren't even pretending anymore

We don’t even have to sign them here

the mail-in ballots with the after-election date is the really scary one

I almost couldn't believe it the first time I voted and I didn't need to show ID

You do here, thank god

You should really have to show a US passport

Conclusive proof of citizenship

I was like wait so how do you know I'm me, what if I go to other polling places, what if a thousand other things, and the catlady at the table was just like "Eh?"

Would also remove those people who can’t be bothered to sit at the courthouse for a day

I know about that CA thing. It was proven 2 years ago that people could sign up on CA department of state website for online voter registration and just check the boxes, "I'm a citizen/No I don't have ID/No I don't have a SSN" and they'd still send you a voter registration card.

California was the first state to refuse to comply with the audit of voter registration

Kinda telling

It’s maddening that was allowed to happen

“Give us your voter rolls pls”
“No”
“Haha what can you do”

lol so the TPUSA guy at my school was taking about how this guy who works for the Koch brothers is gonna be here, and he tried explaining to me that even if he doesn't agree with us on immigration, he's on our side because he's "right wing"

Again, it’s almost impossible to assume this is all the result of incompetence

I had more in common with an anti immigration leftist than a conservative even when I was more right wing economically

A lot of my criticism of conservatism and republicans back from my leftist days is still very valid

>13 year old me “all they care about is tax cuts for the rich and more wars”

>23 year old me “all they care about is tax cuts for the rich and more wars”

Being opposed to imperialism has been my only consistent political position for literally my entire life

My economic and environmental views have remained the same

It's wrong think for whites to have opinions about race in general.

Also @Nemets - thanks for recommending Catherine the Great literature to me. I haven't been this hooked on a book since goosebumps as a kid.

No. I know the basics of her story, but right now she's 15 and just arrived in Moscow. Peter is a true fool and she is shocked at his childishness, while the courtiers are very pleased at her warmth and manners.

Three very different and very important figures

Very odd cast of characters

Well that's disconcerting.
https://twitter.com/sairasameerarao/status/1063269397660229632

She's not wrong

wypipo are currently the most irrationally tolerant people in history, tweets like such are hilarious

White pill of the week: look at the comments section.

We're winning boys.

*gray pill of the week:*

Good morning, cousins. The weather is crisp in western OK.

Have a productive and white day.

Share all white pills.

At least the word "racist" is being rejected.

press F for DeRay and BLM

no one survives globohomo

Real dorito posting hours who up

Getting ready to cook at a Czech Christmas fair

Language, please @Rabbidsith @Wood-Ape - OK/MN

?

Fritos are best fire tinder

@Phillip Wiglesworth - FL ?

explain?

Racial epithets are really unprofessional language, gentlemen.

What epithet?

The ms word probably

??? That makes no sense.

Sorry I didn't honor our brave racemixers enough 😒 <:really:453005408064241674>

Indeed.

I think that the term "racemixing" is less politically correct.

@Phillip Wiglesworth - FL I'm not going to argue too much and I don't generally argue with the mods once they explain themselves. However, even I think that went a bit too far.

Are we allowed to oppose genocidal miscegenation? Is it better if I construct a novel clinical term- like "civilization traitor Bantu incubator"?

I’m sorry you feel that way, but seriously, go out in public...find a nice gathering of respectable white people and walk up to them. Then exclaim,”Man...there sure are a lot of ______ in this restaurant.”

Come back and tell me how they respond to that crudeness.

Go up and talk to them about *anything* race based in public.

Tell that that you don't believe in multiculturalism and see what happens.

"Man...there sure is too much diversity in here."

This entire chat is esoteric shop talk. You are being disingenuous if you think ANY thing said here would be said to random normies.

Mods are always trying their best to protect our organization. Countless hours and people’s personal finances have been poured into this. Shouldn’t be taken personal. I don’t see anyway around that not falling under the epithet rule.

@Gregory - NC Go and say *that* to a bunch of normies.

And it’s been moderated in the past to be objectively fair

fair enough

I don't want to argue too much. I just think that's going a bit too far.

I could empathize

Then let's agree on an "acceptable term".

I was just thinking of what a term may be lol

I'm going with CTBI

.

@Wood-Ape - OK/MN Thanks.

okay, will introduce sister to a strong black man for IE's rep. BRB 😂 maybe double date with your Asian GF is in order

;)

@Phillip Wiglesworth - FL What term would be more acceptable for you?

@Rabbidsith yes, I would like to conclude topic constructively

As would I.

@Wood-Ape - OK/MN It's not entirely true that is just esoteric "shop" talk. Part of what we do as an org is helping outsiders - as well as ourselves - discover a better way to both behave and communicate as respectable people. People who others look to and say to themselves, "I want to be like them. I want to _be_ them. They sure are a great bunch of people doing good things." The language we use can be both a bad or a good first impression to anyone, including ourselves.

@Phillip Wiglesworth - FL Then can you give us an idea as to what would be more acceptable in your opinion?

Total dodge.
I asked you if we are allowed to criticize mixing, a major cause of white decline and eventual dispossession.
And if so how.

@Rabbidsith What idea or concept are you wishing to express?

racemixing

There's the word.

alright

I think criticizing race mixing without denigrating is more effective

I still wouldn't say that in polite company.

@William Russell The term "race mixing" itself is denigrating.

Mmmmm, possibly so. I may be learning here, too. Let's think of a way to describe the concept together that wouldn't come off as crude and denigrating.

Yea so are gender pronouns in certain company

Indeed.

I'm going with CTBI?

I agree that the term “race mixer” is also crude. The fact that any word for the act is offensive really shows how offensive the act it to whites.

@Phillip Wiglesworth - FL Fair enough?

I don't know what that is

Look at Wood-Ape's previous post.

"civilization traitor Bantu incubator"

I see CTBI written twice, but I don't know what that is.

is that better?

Womb Leasing

I'm not trying to troll. But if we aren't allowed to speak of mixing as not positive...

@Phillip Wiglesworth - FL Unless you have a suggestion, then it's not helpful to me.

Women with Jungle Fever

that's not better

Safari-goers

I like Womb Leasing

@VinceChaos How is that any better than ms?

Are we talking about speaking against race mixing in a hypothetical shop talk, or are we debating whether we can denounce race mixing here.

Race mixing is degenerate

@The Eternal Anglo The second one.

Idk @Rabbidsith

"lease" implies a temporary state. The damage of racemixing is permanent

That's my problem is that there's not a more politically correct term for it.

@Wood-Ape - OK/MN Fair enough.

Touché

@The Eternal Anglo both

It's just a funny term.

That's why I like it.

I’m using it from now on

k

My best friend from childhood leased her womb twice.

Oof

So did her sister

Oof

Oof

And that is why we are losing

I'm going with that term.

among other reasons

This convo doesn’t seem appropriate for IE Gen not trying to be a buzzkill

It’s trollish

Not constructive

And devolving

Okay, so no criticism of immigration either?

@William Russell did you hear that a judge ruled against asking about citizenship on the new census?

That would be amazing for those states where it impacts the electoral college

It is demoralizing and disturbing and absurd if we can't conclusively say race mixing is bad and figure out an acceptable way of saying so.

We can do that

@Wood-Ape - OK/MN I agree.

@William Russell That's what we're trying to do.

Every time that I break the rules, I try to be better at following them. However, there still *does* need to be a balance between optics and open discussion.

Well so far your alternatives suck lol do better

@William Russell Do you have a better one?

Good morning and happy Saturday, fellow IE gentlemen and ladies.

@Selma Good morning. Sorry 'bout the mess.

@Selma lol not so much

@William Russell Don't tell us that our alternatives suck and then not offer a better one.

It's not helpful.

Having a term is better than not having one.

@Selma what do you think “womb leasing” means?

@Deleted User - Getting paid to have a baby?

I think CTBI is going the wrong direction

It sounds like being a surrogate lol

surrogate mother? @Deleted User

That’s true. Dang.

I just say race mixers in IE Gen discord chat

Yeah.

Ok.

It was supposed to be a euphemism for racemixing.

Loose women

Are we agreeing on the hard race mixing then?

I concede that "MS" is lowbrow and will not use it henceforth.

I would not have taken it that way, but language does evolve in interesting directions.

k

Thank you @Wood-Ape - OK/MN

@Phillip Wiglesworth - FL I also concede such a thing and I try not to use it in the future.

Thank you @Rabbidsith 😃

It's always nice to see people compromising.

So we agree that race mixing is proper term?

Lol who hijacked a train?!

#FakeNews

Some wackos out there I swear

but if we can't criticize mixing at all then we give up half the struggle

Good morning. Miscegenation destroys identity and is something that has the potential to *finish off* our race

Saying that is not against the rules

Don’t be crude about it though

K.

@Rabbidsith how about Miscegenator”?

Fair enough

That works.

I like it.

I like that one lol

@Rabbidsith I think, for now, that can be acceptable language to use here. We may learn of a better way, in the future, to express the concept and then we'll go from there.

Thousands of years of breeding have led to you being white and having your features, and all it takes is a poor decision to sully it all.

Nice work @NateDahl76 !

@Phillip Wiglesworth - FL I agree.

k

Yep yep

@NateDahl76 I started to worry until you came in with that nice hot take. Thank you for reassuring us Nate*

Worry about what lol

@The Eternal Anglo same

They were getting worried that we weren’t allowed to discuss the topic

That tends to happen sometimes when context is missing due to moderated posts lol

We try to avoid it, but...ya know...it just happens.

In those words, the topic of race mixing can easily be seen as bad optics because, at face value, any question of the statement, "we're all the same!" marks you as a sperg to normies.

HOWEVER, the mass think with their emotions, and most leaders like to think through rational thought, so the question of race mixing **BEHIND CLOSE DOORS** is definitely a route to go, **after** you are sure they are not too cognitively dissonant. I argue that any anti miscegenation talk in public will always end bad... until we move the window farther right.

I definitely think that miscegenation isn't a necessary red pill until after someone becomes Pro White, and wants us to survive. Until then, it's not important to convince normies otherwise. IMO

Well put

@The Eternal Anglo Ya, but none of that is really the context of what was moderated. That's just the direction the conversation went in the aftermath 😃

@Phillip Wiglesworth - FL That's true my dudes, but it got my mind running on the topic of when we should talk about it

All is cool and good <:chad:359013583469805568>

Nuh uh

Only 2016-2017 I.E members will remember <:chad:359013583469805568> <:chad:359013583469805568> <:chad:359013583469805568>

lol yup

Is it the big ghey that I miss Nathan, I hope he is doing good and is safe

He has the aesthetic

Miss him, too. Couldn't believe how short he is when I first met him.

Only if you say no homo first

For the new people: Nathan wrote all the <#371705962224025610> documents, fyi.

He was that "deleted user". RIP 😦

F

A little part of him is in all of us. 😇

He is with us always.

F

Low key Nathan should come back because we miss him

f

Alexa this is so sad play despacito

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/11/17/rip-california-gop-republicans-lash-out-after-midterm-election-debacle-1000481

GOP Republicans openly advocating self-defeating accelerationism.

What will happen if they rebrand themselves?

After Dem policies wreck the state, only then *can* they rebuild.

The GOP is not palatable to anyone *other* than whites and small portions of woke minorities.

Well the republicans quoted in the article who are advocating destroying the party and restarting are also the ones blaming Trump for their failures. So they would probably rebrand themselves as something cucky.

Yup.

Then they would find out that by cucking, they would be destroying their own party.

A cucked Republican can't pander to Leftists.

They can only cuck and lose yet more votes.

That's the problem with compromise politics. It satisfies no one and ultimately will be rejected by everyone.

I'm surprised some of them just don't turn into Democrats

Indeed.

What is the point of even calling yourself a Republican if you hold all the Democrats' moral values and like them more and hate your own party?

Compromise politics leads to an unsatisfying outcome that takes mountains of work in order to achieve. It ultimately doesn't help, is too much effort, and doesn't accomplish the goals it wants to accomplish.

@ThisIsChris No idea. Obviously, it's to lose elections.

There's no other rational explanation.

For a long time I've assumed the party apparatus is controlled by people who hate the party

Indeed.

That's the only rational explanation.

Compromise implies you understand you need to have SOMETHING in common with your political opposite in the same country. Unfortunately that something is now anti white hatred

>Robert Conquest’s Three Laws of Politics:

>1. Everyone is conservative about what he knows best.
>2. Any organization not explicitly right-wing sooner or later becomes left-wing.
>3. The simplest way to explain the behavior of any bureaucratic organization is to assume that it is controlled by a cabal of its enemies.

https://www.isegoria.net/2008/07/robert-conquests-three-laws-of-politics/

Leftists are always hungry for more power

Boomer parents are so strange. My Dad called me while I was out last night and left a msg *son, no need to call back. But how do you spell "dye" not "die", you know "dye" like to stain or color something. I think it's d I y but I'm not sure. OK have a good evening.*

Bruh, what?

You have a computer too

@Papa Pizzagate have you tried turning your dad off and turning him back on again?.... Such a weird question to ask...

Haha

In order to look something up you have to know how to spell it tho lol

Ideally

He's a good dude. Just baffling sometimes. He did have a stroke so he says off the wall stuff occasionally.

Also what is texting