@Phillip Wiglesworth - FL I'm not going to argue too much and I don't generally argue with the mods once they explain themselves. However, even I think that went a bit too far.

Are we allowed to oppose genocidal miscegenation? Is it better if I construct a novel clinical term- like "civilization traitor Bantu incubator"?

I’m sorry you feel that way, but seriously, go out in public...find a nice gathering of respectable white people and walk up to them. Then exclaim,”Man...there sure are a lot of ______ in this restaurant.”

Come back and tell me how they respond to that crudeness.

Go up and talk to them about *anything* race based in public.

Tell that that you don't believe in multiculturalism and see what happens.

"Man...there sure is too much diversity in here."

This entire chat is esoteric shop talk. You are being disingenuous if you think ANY thing said here would be said to random normies.

Mods are always trying their best to protect our organization. Countless hours and people’s personal finances have been poured into this. Shouldn’t be taken personal. I don’t see anyway around that not falling under the epithet rule.

@Gregory - NC Go and say *that* to a bunch of normies.

And it’s been moderated in the past to be objectively fair

fair enough

I don't want to argue too much. I just think that's going a bit too far.

I could empathize

Then let's agree on an "acceptable term".

I was just thinking of what a term may be lol

I'm going with CTBI

.

@Wood-Ape - OK/MN Thanks.

okay, will introduce sister to a strong black man for IE's rep. BRB 😂 maybe double date with your Asian GF is in order

;)

@Phillip Wiglesworth - FL What term would be more acceptable for you?

@Rabbidsith yes, I would like to conclude topic constructively

As would I.

@Wood-Ape - OK/MN It's not entirely true that is just esoteric "shop" talk. Part of what we do as an org is helping outsiders - as well as ourselves - discover a better way to both behave and communicate as respectable people. People who others look to and say to themselves, "I want to be like them. I want to _be_ them. They sure are a great bunch of people doing good things." The language we use can be both a bad or a good first impression to anyone, including ourselves.

@Phillip Wiglesworth - FL Then can you give us an idea as to what would be more acceptable in your opinion?

Total dodge.
I asked you if we are allowed to criticize mixing, a major cause of white decline and eventual dispossession.
And if so how.

@Rabbidsith What idea or concept are you wishing to express?

racemixing

There's the word.

alright

I think criticizing race mixing without denigrating is more effective

I still wouldn't say that in polite company.

@William Russell The term "race mixing" itself is denigrating.

Mmmmm, possibly so. I may be learning here, too. Let's think of a way to describe the concept together that wouldn't come off as crude and denigrating.

Yea so are gender pronouns in certain company

Indeed.

I'm going with CTBI?

I agree that the term “race mixer” is also crude. The fact that any word for the act is offensive really shows how offensive the act it to whites.

@Phillip Wiglesworth - FL Fair enough?

I don't know what that is

Look at Wood-Ape's previous post.