@Phillip Wiglesworth - FL That's true my dudes, but it got my mind running on the topic of when we should talk about it

All is cool and good <:chad:359013583469805568>

Nuh uh

Only 2016-2017 I.E members will remember <:chad:359013583469805568> <:chad:359013583469805568> <:chad:359013583469805568>

lol yup

Is it the big ghey that I miss Nathan, I hope he is doing good and is safe

He has the aesthetic

Miss him, too. Couldn't believe how short he is when I first met him.

Only if you say no homo first

For the new people: Nathan wrote all the <#371705962224025610> documents, fyi.

He was that "deleted user". RIP 😦

F

A little part of him is in all of us. 😇

He is with us always.

F

Low key Nathan should come back because we miss him

f

Alexa this is so sad play despacito

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/11/17/rip-california-gop-republicans-lash-out-after-midterm-election-debacle-1000481

GOP Republicans openly advocating self-defeating accelerationism.

What will happen if they rebrand themselves?

After Dem policies wreck the state, only then *can* they rebuild.

The GOP is not palatable to anyone *other* than whites and small portions of woke minorities.

Well the republicans quoted in the article who are advocating destroying the party and restarting are also the ones blaming Trump for their failures. So they would probably rebrand themselves as something cucky.

Yup.

Then they would find out that by cucking, they would be destroying their own party.

A cucked Republican can't pander to Leftists.

They can only cuck and lose yet more votes.

That's the problem with compromise politics. It satisfies no one and ultimately will be rejected by everyone.

I'm surprised some of them just don't turn into Democrats

Indeed.

What is the point of even calling yourself a Republican if you hold all the Democrats' moral values and like them more and hate your own party?

Compromise politics leads to an unsatisfying outcome that takes mountains of work in order to achieve. It ultimately doesn't help, is too much effort, and doesn't accomplish the goals it wants to accomplish.

@ThisIsChris No idea. Obviously, it's to lose elections.

There's no other rational explanation.

For a long time I've assumed the party apparatus is controlled by people who hate the party

Indeed.

That's the only rational explanation.

Compromise implies you understand you need to have SOMETHING in common with your political opposite in the same country. Unfortunately that something is now anti white hatred