I'm going with that term.

among other reasons

This convo doesn’t seem appropriate for IE Gen not trying to be a buzzkill

It’s trollish

Not constructive

And devolving

Okay, so no criticism of immigration either?

@William Russell did you hear that a judge ruled against asking about citizenship on the new census?

That would be amazing for those states where it impacts the electoral college

It is demoralizing and disturbing and absurd if we can't conclusively say race mixing is bad and figure out an acceptable way of saying so.

We can do that

@Wood-Ape - OK/MN I agree.

@William Russell That's what we're trying to do.

Every time that I break the rules, I try to be better at following them. However, there still *does* need to be a balance between optics and open discussion.

Well so far your alternatives suck lol do better

@William Russell Do you have a better one?

Good morning and happy Saturday, fellow IE gentlemen and ladies.

@Selma Good morning. Sorry 'bout the mess.

@Selma lol not so much

@William Russell Don't tell us that our alternatives suck and then not offer a better one.

It's not helpful.

Having a term is better than not having one.

@Selma what do you think “womb leasing” means?

@Deleted User - Getting paid to have a baby?

I think CTBI is going the wrong direction

It sounds like being a surrogate lol

surrogate mother? @Deleted User

That’s true. Dang.

I just say race mixers in IE Gen discord chat

Yeah.

Ok.

It was supposed to be a euphemism for racemixing.

Loose women

Are we agreeing on the hard race mixing then?

I concede that "MS" is lowbrow and will not use it henceforth.

I would not have taken it that way, but language does evolve in interesting directions.

k

Thank you @Wood-Ape - OK/MN

@Phillip Wiglesworth - FL I also concede such a thing and I try not to use it in the future.

Thank you @Rabbidsith 😃

It's always nice to see people compromising.