https://www.counter-currents.com/2018/05/hero-worship-and-tommytards/

Yeah the Zionist thing irked me before but that was about it. I thought he was being persecuted by the state previously though just not this time even if I disagree with the court rules

Classy!

Big dox of Atlanta Antifa, who have given us a lot of trouble.

Much more to come.

Definitely a white pill for me 😃

Nice, finally the tables are turned a bit

Truth is like the Sun. You can close your eyes to it, . . . but it's still there. Elvis Presley (The King)

@Agree&Amplify - GA I know it's nice poetic justice, but we can't be posting people's dox in here. Rule 11.

https://youtu.be/5n0wY2Uq0ps

He makes some good points on short term vs long term thinking and the political landscape for us on the right.

BOIS. <#358430131447922688> is still lit.

@sigruna14 👍🏻

watching Lindsay graham shill for that lying rag journo that got killed by the saudis

wants us to interfere again in the ME

why is cuck graham back

"I'll be practical w illegal """immigrants""" that have been here for decades"

Yeah, it's disappointing, but did we really think he had suddenly become woke? He's still a swamp creature.

I thought the kav experience had made some actual changes in these people

I was *not* correct

http://archive.is/LYKpC

Interesting article. JewYork TImes journo tacitly admits some of our points.

Genuinely good article. It's well written and eye opening for your everyday person.

*"by century’s end two in five human beings could be African."* <:nervous:359009898115104770> <:sad:366743316475281408>

>4.5bil by 2100

>not even a billion euros

<:tucker:378724715679711233>

The easiest way to control the African population is to stop sending them aid and making them survive on their own.

they're basically only kept alive through gibz

I don't see that happening at all

Are they the real White Supremacists thinking we are so industrious and innovative that we can plausibly care for all of those Africans? Or is this out of malice?

OFC we all know the answer to that one...

I just read the NYT article and... wow. I know Ross Douthat is a normie con to the letter, and NYT is an enemy source, but that was basically bunch of alt-right talking points wrapped up in palatable language.

On the other hand, if there were a catastrophic pandemic (which there's typically at least one or two or three every century), densely populated places like Africa would lose significantly more people than sparsely populated western countries

*oh no*

nani, ebola-chan noo

nobody knows what that motive is all about

it doesn't make sense in any form of economics

other than living with the assumption that the entire nation is gonna be the same with a whole new crowd of people around

Africa is far from being densely populated in many parts. In fact, as far as people go per square mile, Europe is incredibly dense.

Which only makes the threat of a disease from one of these Shithole countries worse

Oh, I was referring to if the population truly grows to such a high number

AH

I think he loosely referring to cities aka ground zero socialist hives

or that

They do lack the infrastructure to properly sanitize, so the effects would be terrible.

they lack the ingenuity to do much of anything on their own

most of INDIA doesn't the infrastructure to sanitize, most people in that nation don't even own a water-tap

And I heard that from the mouth of some of their social leaders

we have to drive the public or at least policy makers cast aside the myth of boasian anthropology in favor of a true racialist viewpoint set forth by Grant and Stoddard

also apparently Ross Douthat supports repealing the 17th Amendment (direct election of senators)

based and redpilled

How else would it be done? By electoral college on a state level?

Nomination or oligarchic selection I assume

I want a more elitist form of government, akin to the original American republic. A senate that can ignore the will of the common voter on occasion is important, or else we'll never fix issues like debt and healthcare

before it was state legislatures

house reps were elected by the state's population, but senators were elected by state legislatures

and of course, the voting population itself was pretty different too...

it's better than what we have now

which is direct election of both

I like it

There is still PR pressure from the public. Republican establishment types support the agenda now

>have awful shitty elite
>have had that since early 20th century
>has only been a matter of how bad they are
>wants a more elitist form of government

<:really:453005408064241674>

oof

We can still b u l l y them

that's why I qualified my argument with the fact that the population was different

that would never work now, and it's good that populists are able to benefit from direct elections

Im pretty sure you get v& and shutdown if you try to bully them

populists' leveraging of direct elections is a reaction to a broken system

we're well past the point of managed, representative democracy, the way it was originally envisioned

but if we were still a serious country, I'd be more comfortable with a less directly-democratic system

of course. everything else is of secondary concern for now

besides, just like in the socialism-libertarianism debate, both direct democracy and illiberal democracy require a high level of trust that your fellow citizens/the elites aren't going to screw you over

and we all know what ruins that societal trust

>elites
>aren't going to screw you over

(((elites)))

I'm talking about people who achieve success and influence in society, not (((elites)))

but fair point

the English, for a long time, had the concept of "noblesse oblige" - basically nobility with obligations to society

i.e. your higher status means you're responsible for giving back, be it through charity, patronage, serving in the military, whatever

if I achieved success & influence in society, as a normie, I would be extremely hesitant to enter politics if I was to do anything short of further attempting to disenfranchise whites

I understand your point I dont really think itll be valid for the mainstream for a long time though

Society, culture, governance, etc have to be molded to the point where that would work well.

you're right - we're in an abnormal situation right now and will be for a while

and those who we trusted to steward society have failed horribly or are actively working against us

so now it's us ordinary people who have to make some aggressive course corrections

with the usual caveats - peacefully, lawfully, in Minecraft, etc. <:4dchess:439923932062154782>

Who's ready to DEFEND THE ROCKIES!

Stupid amounts of pumped up for this

@Nemets Leadership has already begun disbursing funds to some travelers. The more donations we receive, the more of our top folks we can send.

Reach out to Wayne and Matthias if you would like to make specific arrangements for someone.

@Sam Anderson so my permission to talk in the media page was taken from me. But regardless, although we are have our opinions on Gavin Mcinnes flaws and shortcomings. He's prevented a ton of smearing by journalists and effectively tied their hands using a lawyer and threatening them with defamation lawsuits

I remember one particular article calling them white supremists he targeted and they resorted to changing it to "ultra-nationalist"

@Sacramento Only mods and coords can post in <#359019439116648458> now. 😕

Rip

The fact that politics is infecting science to this degree is pretty terrifying tbh.

it's nothing new

gotta get that grant money boiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii