Message from @NateDahl76
Discord ID: 503601006618083329
*oh no*
nani, ebola-chan noo
nobody knows what that motive is all about
it doesn't make sense in any form of economics
other than living with the assumption that the entire nation is gonna be the same with a whole new crowd of people around
Africa is far from being densely populated in many parts. In fact, as far as people go per square mile, Europe is incredibly dense.
Which only makes the threat of a disease from one of these Shithole countries worse
Oh, I was referring to if the population truly grows to such a high number
AH
I think he loosely referring to cities aka ground zero socialist hives
or that
They do lack the infrastructure to properly sanitize, so the effects would be terrible.
they lack the ingenuity to do much of anything on their own
most of INDIA doesn't the infrastructure to sanitize, most people in that nation don't even own a water-tap
And I heard that from the mouth of some of their social leaders
we have to drive the public or at least policy makers cast aside the myth of boasian anthropology in favor of a true racialist viewpoint set forth by Grant and Stoddard
also apparently Ross Douthat supports repealing the 17th Amendment (direct election of senators)
based and redpilled
How else would it be done? By electoral college on a state level?
Nomination or oligarchic selection I assume
I want a more elitist form of government, akin to the original American republic. A senate that can ignore the will of the common voter on occasion is important, or else we'll never fix issues like debt and healthcare
before it was state legislatures
house reps were elected by the state's population, but senators were elected by state legislatures
and of course, the voting population itself was pretty different too...
it's better than what we have now
which is direct election of both
I like it
There is still PR pressure from the public. Republican establishment types support the agenda now
>have awful shitty elite
>have had that since early 20th century
>has only been a matter of how bad they are
>wants a more elitist form of government
<:really:453005408064241674>
oof
We can still b u l l y them
that's why I qualified my argument with the fact that the population was different
that would never work now, and it's good that populists are able to benefit from direct elections
Im pretty sure you get v& and shutdown if you try to bully them
populists' leveraging of direct elections is a reaction to a broken system
we're well past the point of managed, representative democracy, the way it was originally envisioned
but if we were still a serious country, I'd be more comfortable with a less directly-democratic system
of course. everything else is of secondary concern for now
besides, just like in the socialism-libertarianism debate, both direct democracy and illiberal democracy require a high level of trust that your fellow citizens/the elites aren't going to screw you over
and we all know what ruins that societal trust