@james j i thought you were talking about the Tractor Truck Driver.

@james j we are talking about two different People.

@james j after the Fact. Talk about Faith.

@james j What will they do next?

@james j lol

@Zuluzeit that is what a Trial is for.

@james j what part of the Cross would discredit their Testimony?

Tolerance and Capabilities are two very different issues.

A bump stock is an Aid to pull the Trigger. It does not change the Trigger Mechanism.

A truthful statement is not necessarily accurate.

A Lie requires Intent.

Especially at a Distance.

Removal based upon Class/Title instead of Behavior is subject to Malfeasance.

First you have to identify the Fraud then evaluate how much occurred. Neither of which has not been determined yet.

The Affidavits should be enough for a Trier of Fact to have a Hearing to establish a Basis for a Trial.

This is a Civil Action and not a Criminal Action. Plaintiffs do not have Search Warrant capability. How do you prove misconduct if the Defendant is in Care and Control of all the Evidence. That is what evidentiary Hearing are for. They establish a basis for Plaintiffs by Court Order to review Evidence!

Changing Ballots is only one issue. Another issue is stuffing the Ballot Box with Illegal Votes.

No matter how many times you count an illegal Ballot it is still an illegal Ballot.

You can Write all of the Laws you want or need. Absence of Enforcement of said Laws is only a Suggestion!

To put it Simply. You can outlaw Murder, if you don't enforce it...... what good is it?

History Note: MLK had a very bad Court Record on his Civil Case filings during the Civil Rights Era.....

Bias can Cloud Reasoning, Unfortunately!

We have witnessed much worse in recent History. The Burning of our Cities!

Violence is only acceptable for Self Defense.

Intent to inflict Harm... to put it Simply!

From a Moral or Legal Standpoint?

If you remember my original statement. ...."to put it Simply "

Yes Solitary is Special.....lol

I don't think Violence should be used as a Sport or foe Entertainment.

Maybe bring back Dulling???

I believe Trump may be a better Shot!....lol

The Video does display "Smoke" IMHO. It should be Investigated throughly.

Was the Video Tape attached to their Report?

Press Releases from that Day state Poll Workers and Observers were told to go Home at 10:30 PM.

Or Simply put... Conformation Bias!

That report could solely be based upon a comment from the Sec of States Office and not an Investigation?

Even if the Case contained Legal Ballots and were counted, it was still done in an illegal fashion under GA Law. The Country Employee created an atmosphere to count Ballots in violation of the Law. The GA Voting Laws are "Strict Liability" based and no Intent is required to violate them.

I didn't know the DSM-5 had criteria to make that Diagnosis over the Internet?

I know. I think you see my point though?...lol

One specific Behavior is not indicative of a Personality Disorder.

Sometimes who Publishes Research Findings becomes more important than the Finding themselves.

Absolute Immunity is a wonderful Tool...

@Doc. Didn't say it was full proof!....lol

Yes it is if it Violates the US Constitution ....

Fraud and an Election Challenge are two different thinks. One is Criminal the other is Process. Both can be violations of Law. The Scope and Remedy are a matter for the Finder of Fact.

*things

That is what Evidentiary Hearings and Trials are for.

The definition is established by the Code of Procedures.

Don't kill the messenger. I didn't make the Rules.

I wake up in the Morning and see Snow on the Ground. Can I prove it Snowed overnight if I didn't see it fall from the Sky?

VPN's????

@Soburin yes and most were discharged based upon Procedural or a Standing Basis.

No matter how many times you count illegal votes it will not change the outcome.

An illegal ballot does not have to be the result of fraud.

He is not the best person to verbalize a Legal Argument or Position.

Kracken or Crack?

Lol

@Beth. Sorry.

Engagement or Entitlement?

My Quote of The Day @Doc

@Zuluzeit it is one of my favorites. I usually State it before or during a Debate. Surprisingly how it throws some People off their Game when the try not to use that word!....lol

@Doc. I usually drive it Home with... Please say what you mean. Don't soften your position with niceties or prequalifers.

"But"....lol @Doc

@Doc. Oil it up First?

@Beth. Only if you see a Seafood reference?

Sometimes a Cigar is just a Cigar....

"But"....again!

@Maw especially if it is like California?

@Maw. How is an Assault Weapon defined?

@Maw I would think an Assault Weapon could only be truly established after an Assault?

@Maw. A hammer or Baseball Bat could be an Assault Weapon? In Theory?

@Zuluzeit Personal Pronouns are Controlled in Canada. Why not Firearms?

@Maw partially True then?

@Maw. Got Ya! 80 % Liberty?

I didn't dig this Rabbit Hole @Zuluzeit

@Maw. What percentage is acceptable?

@Zuluzeit. I aim to Please...lol

@Maw. You assigned the percentage.

@Maw truthfulness and accuracy are two very different things.

@Maw what is a Half Truth. Is it something like a "But" Statement?

@Maw misleading would imply deception. Which is a Lie?

@Maw okay... A Half Lie?

Sometimes?.... What is the other half than?

@Maw. 60% correct than. Better than Half Truths?....lol

@Maw I'm not making the claim. You choose the word Half. Explain how it doesn't mean Half or 50%?

@Maw I am unable to hear tone, volume or observe Body language in a Text Chat. Other than that I would agree. I can only observe the written Word!

Sarcasm can be a defense mechanism for true feelings?

"I was only Kidding"....

No. My statement didn't say that.

I understood your question.

@Maw you are supporting my argument with your Post to @leftingfighter33 ?

"Hung"

@Maw your perception of his meaning of "Hung" is reality?

Sorry, yes you did.

Beyond...

It is a Quid Pro Quo plain and simple. Not a Stimulus or Relief Package?

This sounds like a General Chat conversation?

I suggest a COVID 2020 Room?

😂