China wants to invade us to be farmers?

@Dedkraken, you just advanced to level 18!

https://www.google.com/amp/s/meaww.com/amp/richard-hopkins-usps-whistleblower-deny-recanting-go-fund-me-page-suspended-us-poll-trump-biden-fraud @William Dinan he then opened up another one where he made more after that was suspended

That guy asked why Georgia's hand recount didnt show discrepancy and they flat lied and said they didnt count them

This is what he uses now @William Dinan https://givesendgo.com/bebrave

Lying doesnt make the Kraken look credible

Lol the theory is that they didn’t count them? @Dedkraken

@james j i thought you were talking about the Tractor Truck Driver.

You asked why he would lie, he is using the same business model as all the other maga grifters (people taking money from maga in hopes it will over turn the election) they saw other people do it and so they do they same. That is why someone would lie @William Dinan

@james j we are talking about two different People.

They will be hailed as hero’s to 70 million people @William Dinan

Yeah James they said a recount never happened that should be very hard for them to prove

I am addressing why someone would lie , then I gave an example of someone who “whistle blew” and how much money he got @William Dinan

Omg what a stretch @Dedkraken

Do you not think potential maga bucks is a reason to lie? @William Dinan

It was more than that... She was trying to assert that 72% of the vote was in question, because of a stupid MI law (that both parties have let stand) where unbalanced precincts are excluded from the audit. The reality is that 72% only represents 441 total votes out of balance. There were other Rep counties that were just as out of balance. And the number of votes in a precinct greatly increases the amount of effort required to get into balance... So, laziness was an unfair characterization that she had to know was not an accurate representation of the decision factors for determining whether to further attempt to balance. @Repeat

@james j after the Fact. Talk about Faith.

@TaLoN132 yikes , did anyone call her out on the 72 percent number? I only watched the beginning cuz I realized she had nothing up front

@William Dinan maga people are very predictable. There is a whole business eco system built around their faith

Trump has raked in 100 million dollars (that doesn’t even go to the legal defense fund). He is fleecing his own supporters. In the fine print he is free to do whatever he wants with the money @William Dinan

@james j What will they do next?

@james j yeah, and that eco system is called a meritocracy...

Prob be famous and be hailed as brave hero’s by maga people @William Dinan make a few bucks. Have some appearances on Trump tv

Lmao meritocracy

@james j lol

@abracadabra.holmes you don’t understand I am talking about a business model based around how hopeful trump supporters are. Their belief and faith has already given Trump 100 million dollars in pocket money

Trump supporters give to people that agree with them and push whatever crazy right wing narrative that is out there @abracadabra.holmes

170, no? Where did I see that?

YouTubers, whistle blowers you name it

On merit. Lmfao

No offense to the maga people @abracadabra.holmes

Trump wants a government based on Trumpery the more you have the better you are

i do understand. im saying that people believe in a meritocracy and that's why they give money. because they believe that's what he's about

Another misleading assertion by so-called "experts. GA was compelled to complete a risk limiting audit which is a hand recount of selected random samples of ballots across all precincts. The number of ballots needed to be counted is determined by a formula based on the number of ballots cast and the margin of victory. In this case, GA would have had to "audit" 1.5M ballots. The elections officials determined that the overhead with identifying and managing a selective recount would have been more cumbersome and taken more time than a 100% hand recount. So, they decided to take that approach. Technically, it was part of the "audit" and that was how they paid for it, but it was in all aspects but name a 100% hand recount.

Yup @Dedkraken

@abracadabra.holmes that would be misguided

Their money. God bless.

So a hand recount is better than a audit @TaLoN132

Audits use statistical samples, by definition, no?

They said only 1 small presinct counted paper ballots and showed fraud basically Talon

They are both hand recounts... The risk limiting audit is just a random sampling that is recounted by hand.