general
Discord ID: 267086373285134338
257,056 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 484/1029
| Next
I don't discuss anything of such import with normies, no
non-normies react with scoffing and reactionary doubt
a few types tend to find themselves easily in the profiles, INTJ is one of them
but say an INFP
they not only may test something else
they may not be entirely convinced of their result
or if they agree with it, not be convinced it tells them anything much
also on a few of the questions i'll answer differently due to the fact that my grandfather on my mom's side is italian
to me it seems like pretty clear people have basically discussable personality traits. maybe you have to calibrate some things to get your model of the individual right.
yeah
yeah, MBTI is good, has a lot of legs
sorry why would it affect your answers @Alien Jesus
your ancestry
no just how my family on his side are
and how is that
differently compared to what?
you cant be other than what you are
yeah i was just saying as a general statement
I understand, fuck italians
nah
sorry, master race
it's fine
i really dont care
not metal
i'm mostly white anyway
are you doing the aspie test
yeah
cool, link the pdf please in the end
aight
I like dungeon synth stuff
and other metal-adjacent stuff like Empyrium or late Ulver
luckily Nester compiled a dungeon synth list too
its pretty short though
most of it sucks
even the good stuff is patchy
most dungeon synth sucks
one of the best tracks
finished
damn
I guess you are an aspie
told ya
my faith was weak
i find your lack of faith disturbing
let me try to find mine
I have been thinking about the following project
tiered right wing literature reading list
so no?
no
alright
I didn't think I was aspie though
the theripist i went to had an aspie son
this is the guy dems ran against the Montana body slamma
I'd vote for him
I'm closer to them than I am to the GOP anyway
Racism is over. https://youtu.be/bGKKzh-B7bc
montana dems are a better breed
is it a coincidence this is shaped like a colon + rectum
in Inferno, Dante is "reborn" into Purgatory through Satan's assholr
maybe he and Plato were both onto something
dang i missed that part
sounds great
Plato was in the Athenian Nihilist Underground Society
He was in the anus
@isaac antsee#9174
hmm
What do you think about esoteric covfefe cult
My resolution
I won't be commenting any longer on websites and blogs
And I will not punish myself anymore by attempting to sit through any of Varg's diatribes other than if they concern gardening
He did make a good point though that Bosnians have nothing to do with Turks
Or more preciselly "BosniAKS"
Speaking about what keeps people united
I was reading the other day about a fight that broke out somewhere on Tibet
between a group of some hundred Sherpas and European mountaneers
Out of which most were probably hippies who think multi-culturalism is a great thing
And without even asking what's the problem, all Europeans present gathered behind other Europeans and joined the defense
Even if they could've easily have been the ones who started the trouble
Even a Pakistani found it natural to join European side, even though he is technically Asian like Sherpas
This is how Europe was and is most naturally united
covfefe
never forget
coffvee
offveec
effecov
veecoff
eveffoc
focevef
3-15-22-6-5-6-5
somebody translate covfefe into hebrew
here's a sentence that utterly baffles me: "healthcare is a right."
healthcare should be a right guaranteed in a modern democratic nation state
is how to read it I guess
it's still nonsense in the american system. We don't guarantee positive rights.
they mean it should be a government entitlement like social security is my guess
i said it, therefore reality
seriously
"going to the moon is a right"
government entitlement = right pretty much
it's just semantics otherwise
rather than try to break down the emotionalism or absurdism of the symbol
it seems a better idea to me to construct the middle position out of it
to see if that is workable, sensible etc.
well, it stops being a semantics issue when it comes to congressional funding and judicial review. A right gets different judicial review than a mere entitlement program.
but I agree with you broadly, I have no problem with a middle ground
if the supreme court interpreted "life, liberty, pursuit of happiness" to include the right to healthcare it would have markedly different effects than just going to single payer healthcare by a law enacted by congress
why dont peope just call it the way it is "i think government should pay for people's healthcare"
why do shitlibs just have to state everything in abstract ideological maxims
because "right" sounds better than "entitlement" i guess
it's the same on both sides, it's how people think
and also, they make it a moral issue
yeah
as it follows from their first principles
and for that matter so does the opposition, because similar first principle issues
American healthcare is a big, rotten, corrupt mess, perhaps partially by design
Positive rights are cancer
healthcare in particular is worrying because it's not a demand that can be satisfied
you can spend infinite money on it and everyone will still die
@The Enlightened Shepherd how else do you ideologically subvert the base culture?
be fair
of course everyone will die
Point is, scarcity exists for it
I work in the NHS, it is a big mess too
I am, but it's already one of our biggest budget items here.
but I can see at the same time, it has considerable merits
and if there was a private setup parallel to it
it would be faultless
I have no problem with reform, including reform to a single payer system
shouldn't healthcare be a big budget item though?
it makes sense to me
it seems reasonable to me that when so many people (a nation) get together
that its for some good mass effect
Why not socialize food production ?
Maybe, if that's what it costs. I'm just exploring the problems with listing it as right vs. an entitlement. If it's a right, it's much harder (in our system) to place limits on it
doing that to a degree is also not a bad idea
Isn't food a right?
healthcare is simple
yeah, if healthcare is, food is just as much I guess
spend according to your possibilities
full stop
We all Know what that crap leads to
getting in debt to fund continuous healthcare demand is as dumb as it can get
do we? I'm not talking about complete socialization
Rationing that hurts everyone
again, stretched to absurdity
these are just dramatic gestures
Look at Canada they have rationing
putting all the food production of one country
you can declaer something a right or even better
a policy
under control of one bureaucracy / system
It's not absurd
but unless it works it wont get anywhere
is a bad idea for efficiency reasons
and that's how it worked out in the soviet shit I think you are referring to
you candeclare "OUR POLICY IS THAT EVERONE HAS ACCESS TO QUALITY FOOD" but unless you can make it work, its another gesture
and you cant
however is it in principle a bad idea for government to have some degree of food production as a safety net or plan for black swan event?
absolutely not
i mean you can to extent to which you have material foundation for it
production or storage
Just curious, can a doctor operate a private practice in the Uk ?
not like the US, but yes
it's bad though
What i'm suggesting is not that absurd, fallot. Our system is already highly concentrated at the very top - the sickest 1% or so account for like 40-50% of our healthcare costs. If we move to guarantee treatment as a right we're looking at an enormous tax burden increase.
I can't simply by myself open up a clinic where I see patients
however, I can group up with a bunch of other specialists and start my own private healthcare firm
today's food situation is a typical example of what happens when standards replace reality
we have tons of surplus food that according to "standards" is healthy
and even acessible
but it just sucks
@UOC from what I've heard expanding medical to everyone would be around 20 trillion
Medicare
communist countries with heavy industry and nuclear power plants had *better* food than in capitalism
because food was decomodified
this is false
but it was lacking
and hence the problem
its simply not true
what you just said
go third path instead
fake news!
i mean "better"
take it with a doze of flexibility
it was less industrialized
it's the slogan of the other side
but at the same time if you are offering it to everyone regardless of their circumstance (except nationality)
I hear in N Korea everyone gets free hOver boards
it is a right, extended by the government
"this much and no more" is a practical issue
You're speaking philosophically and you're correct. But legally, "right" is different than "law enacted by congress"
how are the people who say right speaking
I don't know
philosophically or legally?
I think philosophically
they don't specify lol
its a moral argument
I think you're right
I think you're law enacted by congress
They don't Know how they're speaking they just want free stuff
haha but it is the way of the jew to speak with double meanings and retreat to the safe one if he's called out
articulation or even consciousness of their argument shouldn't stop one from considering it coldly
that is true
a lot of leftist stuff is simply cover
for jew/lizard/satan
like "brotherhood of man"
its a truism, certainly in many senses there is a brotherhood of man
(((equality)))
but what do you do from there, what do you justify on the basis of that
is open ended unless it is under some other context
like tribe (nationalism) or God
if you read Peter Singer or other older, better utilitarians
you could interpret "brotherhood of man" to be the widest circle of ethical responsibility
i.e. if you happened to see a guy drowning, knowing nothing else, you might throw him a rope
I think that's incoherent
it doesn't give me a reason
ethics is cancer
but if that circle conflicts with a higher ethical circle, you'd stick to the higher circle
well the underlying reason i've assumed is just the Utilitarian "greatest good" thing which is ultimately axiomatic and therefore incoherent
yeah
i'm watching old mormon vids
look how white and wholesome those kids are
where's exilarch
Thad nationalism
lel
but weren't they all white and wholesome
in 1968
or is that past the peak
they all meaning mormons or americans?
americans, but I guess I meant whites
white media
1968 is when it all went to hell
Pretty sure Mormons didn't let blacks in until the 70s
no, blacks were always allowed to be members of the church
they couldn't hold the priesthood
Theologically they were cursed by Yahweh
the beach boys discography is like a perfect snapshot of what leftism does to culture
Could be wrong, I'm operating on here say
it's pretty sad this kid would likely be ritually abused by demonic mormon pseudopriests
the mormons stayed WASP while the east coast got flooded by wops micks slavs and jews
"the whole family needs help"
honestly
its a frame of mind thing, the gulf states should really be a model for that
257,056 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 484/1029
| Next