Message from @OJneg
Discord ID: 319508320450904065
it is a right, extended by the government
"this much and no more" is a practical issue
You're speaking philosophically and you're correct. But legally, "right" is different than "law enacted by congress"
how are the people who say right speaking
I don't know
philosophically or legally?
I think philosophically
they don't specify lol
its a moral argument
I think you're right
I think you're law enacted by congress
They don't Know how they're speaking they just want free stuff
haha but it is the way of the jew to speak with double meanings and retreat to the safe one if he's called out
articulation or even consciousness of their argument shouldn't stop one from considering it coldly
that is true
a lot of leftist stuff is simply cover
for jew/lizard/satan
like "brotherhood of man"
its a truism, certainly in many senses there is a brotherhood of man
but what do you do from there, what do you justify on the basis of that
is open ended unless it is under some other context
like tribe (nationalism) or God
if you read Peter Singer or other older, better utilitarians
you could interpret "brotherhood of man" to be the widest circle of ethical responsibility
i.e. if you happened to see a guy drowning, knowing nothing else, you might throw him a rope
I think that's incoherent
it doesn't give me a reason
ethics is cancer
but if that circle conflicts with a higher ethical circle, you'd stick to the higher circle
well the underlying reason i've assumed is just the Utilitarian "greatest good" thing which is ultimately axiomatic and therefore incoherent
yeah
i'm watching old mormon vids
look how white and wholesome those kids are
where's exilarch
Thad nationalism
lel
but weren't they all white and wholesome
in 1968