@UOC well didnt the greek n romans back then luv them some pederasty

Plato was in the Athenian Nihilist Underground Society

He was in the anus

@isaac antsee#9174

hmm

What do you think about esoteric covfefe cult

My resolution

I won't be commenting any longer on websites and blogs

And I will not punish myself anymore by attempting to sit through any of Varg's diatribes other than if they concern gardening

He did make a good point though that Bosnians have nothing to do with Turks

Or more preciselly "BosniAKS"

Speaking about what keeps people united

I was reading the other day about a fight that broke out somewhere on Tibet

between a group of some hundred Sherpas and European mountaneers

Out of which most were probably hippies who think multi-culturalism is a great thing

And without even asking what's the problem, all Europeans present gathered behind other Europeans and joined the defense

Even if they could've easily have been the ones who started the trouble

Even a Pakistani found it natural to join European side, even though he is technically Asian like Sherpas

This is how Europe was and is most naturally united

covfefe

never forget

coffvee
offveec
effecov
veecoff
eveffoc
focevef

3-15-22-6-5-6-5

somebody translate covfefe into hebrew

here's a sentence that utterly baffles me: "healthcare is a right."

healthcare should be a right guaranteed in a modern democratic nation state

is how to read it I guess

it's still nonsense in the american system. We don't guarantee positive rights.

they mean it should be a government entitlement like social security is my guess

i said it, therefore reality

seriously

"going to the moon is a right"

government entitlement = right pretty much

it's just semantics otherwise

rather than try to break down the emotionalism or absurdism of the symbol

it seems a better idea to me to construct the middle position out of it

to see if that is workable, sensible etc.

well, it stops being a semantics issue when it comes to congressional funding and judicial review. A right gets different judicial review than a mere entitlement program.

but I agree with you broadly, I have no problem with a middle ground

if the supreme court interpreted "life, liberty, pursuit of happiness" to include the right to healthcare it would have markedly different effects than just going to single payer healthcare by a law enacted by congress