this is false

but it was lacking

and hence the problem

its simply not true

what you just said

go third path instead

fake news!

i mean "better"

@OJneg @fallot depends on how you do it. That's my whole point. Doing it as a "right" makes it way harder to say "this much, and no more" than just doing it as a program

take it with a doze of flexibility

it was less industrialized

it's the slogan of the other side

but at the same time if you are offering it to everyone regardless of their circumstance (except nationality)

I hear in N Korea everyone gets free hOver boards

it is a right, extended by the government

"this much and no more" is a practical issue

You're speaking philosophically and you're correct. But legally, "right" is different than "law enacted by congress"

how are the people who say right speaking

I don't know

philosophically or legally?

I think philosophically

they don't specify lol

its a moral argument

I think you're right

I think you're law enacted by congress

They don't Know how they're speaking they just want free stuff

haha but it is the way of the jew to speak with double meanings and retreat to the safe one if he's called out

articulation or even consciousness of their argument shouldn't stop one from considering it coldly

that is true

@UOClmao<:yehuda:286647952569532417>

a lot of leftist stuff is simply cover

for jew/lizard/satan

like "brotherhood of man"

its a truism, certainly in many senses there is a brotherhood of man

(((equality)))

but what do you do from there, what do you justify on the basis of that

is open ended unless it is under some other context

like tribe (nationalism) or God

if you read Peter Singer or other older, better utilitarians

you could interpret "brotherhood of man" to be the widest circle of ethical responsibility

i.e. if you happened to see a guy drowning, knowing nothing else, you might throw him a rope