Message from @UOC
Discord ID: 319491170243706881
Plato was in the Athenian Nihilist Underground Society
He was in the anus
@isaac antsee#9174
hmm
What do you think about esoteric covfefe cult
My resolution
I won't be commenting any longer on websites and blogs
And I will not punish myself anymore by attempting to sit through any of Varg's diatribes other than if they concern gardening
He did make a good point though that Bosnians have nothing to do with Turks
Or more preciselly "BosniAKS"
Speaking about what keeps people united
I was reading the other day about a fight that broke out somewhere on Tibet
between a group of some hundred Sherpas and European mountaneers
Out of which most were probably hippies who think multi-culturalism is a great thing
And without even asking what's the problem, all Europeans present gathered behind other Europeans and joined the defense
Even if they could've easily have been the ones who started the trouble
Even a Pakistani found it natural to join European side, even though he is technically Asian like Sherpas
This is how Europe was and is most naturally united
covfefe
coffvee
offveec
effecov
veecoff
eveffoc
focevef
3-15-22-6-5-6-5
somebody translate covfefe into hebrew
here's a sentence that utterly baffles me: "healthcare is a right."
healthcare should be a right guaranteed in a modern democratic nation state
is how to read it I guess
it's still nonsense in the american system. We don't guarantee positive rights.
they mean it should be a government entitlement like social security is my guess
i said it, therefore reality
seriously
"going to the moon is a right"
government entitlement = right pretty much
it's just semantics otherwise
rather than try to break down the emotionalism or absurdism of the symbol
it seems a better idea to me to construct the middle position out of it
to see if that is workable, sensible etc.
well, it stops being a semantics issue when it comes to congressional funding and judicial review. A right gets different judicial review than a mere entitlement program.
but I agree with you broadly, I have no problem with a middle ground
if the supreme court interpreted "life, liberty, pursuit of happiness" to include the right to healthcare it would have markedly different effects than just going to single payer healthcare by a law enacted by congress
why dont peope just call it the way it is "i think government should pay for people's healthcare"