if you read Peter Singer or other older, better utilitarians

you could interpret "brotherhood of man" to be the widest circle of ethical responsibility

i.e. if you happened to see a guy drowning, knowing nothing else, you might throw him a rope

I think that's incoherent

it doesn't give me a reason

ethics is cancer

but if that circle conflicts with a higher ethical circle, you'd stick to the higher circle

well the underlying reason i've assumed is just the Utilitarian "greatest good" thing which is ultimately axiomatic and therefore incoherent

yeah

i'm watching old mormon vids

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J4xfuJoj5YI#t=11m8s

look how white and wholesome those kids are

where's exilarch

Thad nationalism

lel

but weren't they all white and wholesome

in 1968

or is that past the peak

they all meaning mormons or americans?

americans, but I guess I meant whites

white media

1968 is when it all went to hell

Pretty sure Mormons didn't let blacks in until the 70s

no, blacks were always allowed to be members of the church

they couldn't hold the priesthood

Theologically they were cursed by Yahweh

the beach boys discography is like a perfect snapshot of what leftism does to culture

Could be wrong, I'm operating on here say

it's pretty sad this kid would likely be ritually abused by demonic mormon pseudopriests

the mormons stayed WASP while the east coast got flooded by wops micks slavs and jews

"the whole family needs help"

honestly

its a frame of mind thing, the gulf states should really be a model for that

white people should study them

not emulate them, as they are horrid

but study them

what's a state of mind thing

state of mind re: whites vs. non-whites

numbers etc.

are you talking about the family

no