Message from @fallot
Discord ID: 319508674928312321
its a moral argument
I think you're right
I think you're law enacted by congress
They don't Know how they're speaking they just want free stuff
haha but it is the way of the jew to speak with double meanings and retreat to the safe one if he's called out
articulation or even consciousness of their argument shouldn't stop one from considering it coldly
that is true
a lot of leftist stuff is simply cover
for jew/lizard/satan
like "brotherhood of man"
its a truism, certainly in many senses there is a brotherhood of man
(((equality)))
but what do you do from there, what do you justify on the basis of that
is open ended unless it is under some other context
like tribe (nationalism) or God
if you read Peter Singer or other older, better utilitarians
you could interpret "brotherhood of man" to be the widest circle of ethical responsibility
i.e. if you happened to see a guy drowning, knowing nothing else, you might throw him a rope
I think that's incoherent
ethics is cancer
but if that circle conflicts with a higher ethical circle, you'd stick to the higher circle
well the underlying reason i've assumed is just the Utilitarian "greatest good" thing which is ultimately axiomatic and therefore incoherent
yeah
i'm watching old mormon vids
look how white and wholesome those kids are
where's exilarch
Thad nationalism
lel
but weren't they all white and wholesome
in 1968
or is that past the peak
they all meaning mormons or americans?
americans, but I guess I meant whites
white media
1968 is when it all went to hell
Pretty sure Mormons didn't let blacks in until the 70s
no, blacks were always allowed to be members of the church
they couldn't hold the priesthood