Message from @OJneg
Discord ID: 319507350061056051
not like the US, but yes
it's bad though
What i'm suggesting is not that absurd, fallot. Our system is already highly concentrated at the very top - the sickest 1% or so account for like 40-50% of our healthcare costs. If we move to guarantee treatment as a right we're looking at an enormous tax burden increase.
I can't simply by myself open up a clinic where I see patients
however, I can group up with a bunch of other specialists and start my own private healthcare firm
today's food situation is a typical example of what happens when standards replace reality
we have tons of surplus food that according to "standards" is healthy
and even acessible
but it just sucks
@UOC from what I've heard expanding medical to everyone would be around 20 trillion
Medicare
communist countries with heavy industry and nuclear power plants had *better* food than in capitalism
because food was decomodified
this is false
but it was lacking
and hence the problem
its simply not true
what you just said
go third path instead
i mean "better"
take it with a doze of flexibility
it was less industrialized
it's the slogan of the other side
but at the same time if you are offering it to everyone regardless of their circumstance (except nationality)
I hear in N Korea everyone gets free hOver boards
it is a right, extended by the government
"this much and no more" is a practical issue
You're speaking philosophically and you're correct. But legally, "right" is different than "law enacted by congress"
how are the people who say right speaking
I don't know
philosophically or legally?
I think philosophically
they don't specify lol
its a moral argument
I think you're right
I think you're law enacted by congress
They don't Know how they're speaking they just want free stuff
haha but it is the way of the jew to speak with double meanings and retreat to the safe one if he's called out