please never do that again

@Migueleby 🇻🇪 hello you fucking cunt

It's a good idea

the chinese should stop making sex dolls and actually reproduce

@Migueleby 🇻🇪 Hello DORK

@Bagelznicecream nah

@Migueleby 🇻🇪 nerd

wait no

nvm

the less the better

more sex dolls

^

The chinese should stop undervaluing the Yuen

more sex dolls less people

#Anti-HumanityGang

^

Gang gang

we should lower the global human population indiscriminately

fuck humanity


fuck humanity

Yes they should.

crumch crunch gang

crumch crunch gang

any and all factors out the window

Death2America gang gang

Death2America gang gang

Death2America gang gang

We should exterminate all life on earth and start with the whites to set an example

just kill random people until we're down to at most 5 million

this

@Diode how th fuck is it 21:58

UK innit

just get rid of the trees to kill of them at once

its not even 21:58 in the uk

Obam is e🅱ic

its 15:59 in uk

@chadmin its 21:59

<:leepictroll:454043570299469834>

17:00

The US should destroy China

no

china rebel gang

china rebel gang

China should destroy the devil (US)

yes

whipe the white man off the face of earth

<:GWskarzzLUL:396058315186110465> <:GWskarzzLUL:396058315186110465> <:GWskarzzLUL:396058315186110465> <:GWskarzzLUL:396058315186110465> <:GWskarzzLUL:396058315186110465> <:GWskarzzLUL:396058315186110465> <:GWskarzzLUL:396058315186110465>

<:GWskarzzLUL:396058315186110465> <:GWskarzzLUL:396058315186110465> <:GWskarzzLUL:396058315186110465> <:GWskarzzLUL:396058315186110465> <:GWskarzzLUL:396058315186110465> <:GWskarzzLUL:396058315186110465> <:GWskarzzLUL:396058315186110465>

<:GWskarzzLUL:396058315186110465> <:GWskarzzLUL:396058315186110465> <:GWskarzzLUL:396058315186110465> <:GWskarzzLUL:396058315186110465> <:GWskarzzLUL:396058315186110465> <:GWskarzzLUL:396058315186110465> <:GWskarzzLUL:396058315186110465>

Corbyn for world Dictator

my internet makes me spam

my internet makes me spam

god help

Lol

k

https://www.wired.com/story/the-us-again-has-worlds-most-powerful-supercomputer/ the US probably has already invested in artificial intelligence.

SHOOT THE COLLEGE PROFESSORS, SEND THE STUDENTS TO THE RICE FIELD TO LEARN THE REALITY OF THE PEASANT CLASS, LET ONE HUNDRED FLOWER BLOOM, CULTURAL REVOLUTION NOW

PRESENTED TO YOU BY THE MAOIST GANG

BOTTOM TEXT

I mean the US is already doing that, and is probably one of the leaders, issue is its all most likely deep state shit. They can for example use a neural network thing to recognize you in any crowd by your walk pattern

AI to rival china?

what an odd question

very

AI is a pretty broad topic tbh, and it encompasses areas that china isn't even a leader in

and to be honest

current AI innovations are pretty underwhelming

little bit, yes

it's funny because the news has been all about how china will win the AI race

but most people aren't actually in the AI race

AI is not the current focus

we could be doing so much more with this type of technology, especially with the economics involved, and yet we still choose to focus on things less important then America's rising debts

I mean it's not just that

even in the tech sphere

AI isn't the focus

china can win the AI race but would still be considered technologically behind

in fact to be quite honest, winning the AI race at this point would be counterproductive

what other countries are working on can't just be "copied", but AI theoretically can be copied much more easily

thing is, so many science fiction books and movies have drilled the "this is the future" quota into us, so we as humans can just barely imagine what we could possibly be doing if our minds were more opened and, even with the crappy technology we have (compared to what we *could* be having).

well atm the majority of the western world is focusing on CPS

I can't speak as much for the east

developing CPS requires a lot of manual work that takes years and years to roll out, even if you have a solution you can just copy

so by all means let china develop AI then steal it after

Has anyone noticed that AI has been showing right wing patterns?

Especially when shown for recruitment, Amazon & Facebook for example had to actually remove theirs because it pretty much said that no woman was fit for the higher up positions.

"Why are you booing me I'm right"

But yeah, I think if the right were to Capitalize on AI, there could be some benefits.

It might also change people's general receptions and responses to it.

Might remove the dystopia stigma.

because AI sees only parameters that need to be filled and so it without discrimination eliminates candidates however people have natural predispositions. Sex, age etc. And the algorythm will simply sort these people out. The issue for AI is always distinguishing the best candidate.

It can usually get a general demographic and general group of people that are a good fit. However once that gorup is established it fails to pick the best candidate from that group since the differences are often times even illogical

its basically hard to code into an algorythm these minute differences that make the biggest difference.

Daily Question 🔖

To what extent should the government play in personal life?
<@&479643036951904267>

Zero

Total as long as you are the government

Most

none at all, as long as you aren't attacking others through force or fraud

75%-90%

Prevention of sinful behaviors. That's it

@everyone Daily Question above

having your name lord tachanka is sinful behavior

Local governments should play a lot, mainly to weed out undesirable people who will cripple society with their degeneracy

nothing except for abortion

Stupid Ben

Stupid Shen?

central not much, it's too easily corruptible

prevent murder, rape, and destruction of property

prevent racisum

I disagree

to Erika

Just to prevent the breaking of law and keep everything in order.

Privacy should only be invaded if there’s probable cause of a crime or a threat to national security

Aside from that, nothing.

Forcing people to not be racist is pretty gay

Preventing crimes is the law, preventing racism is removing freedom of speech

exactly

@Victor Von Doom im 10

ok

Well imma have to ban u

I cant tho

good

Early steps - age 0-3 for in home speech therapy for late talkers etc is already fully funded by tax payers. Also private speech therapists are earning a high hourly usually $180-$220 hourly

All public govermental figures rescind their privacy

@Yandere-Chan Why is your age in any way applicable?

Should I deport herl

?

Unless its against the national security of the country the government should have no business in your day to day life.

i don't know

Yes

Bow knows what's up

minimal involvement. get involved if people are causing harm to someone else's life, liberty, and property. but otherwise there's more important things for the govt to worry about.

I like an authoritarian rule with freedom of speech

But it will never work like thar

That

That sounds like a good idea

If its against the interest of national security government should be involved for the greater good of the country over the privacy of the individual that could be a risk to national security.

but only in theory

Yep

I'm a fascist, so anything that is deemed to be in the interest of the nation.

So imma deport Erika cuz shes 10

Im just extremely nationalist.

@t r u e Also fascist is thrown around a lot what does it exactly mean?

I have read A squire's trial but it doesn't really give me a complete answer.

governance in accordance with natural law

Well, it's a hierarchical form of government rather than one that celebrates democracy. There are some "freedoms" to do things that are harmful to the individual and the nation that I don't think are beneficial. Extreme individualism is harmful. So some things democratic societies might consider "freedoms" would likely be regulated by government.

Seems like a good system, though is there any way to stop corruption at higher levels of government?

Nope its full rule of one party.

Its a dictatorship by party

Its for a state of national defense

@Victor Von Doom you may find this useful to read too, if you haven't already.

Fascism has a socialist economy, which is why I don’t personally like it.

Its based off socialism as its founder Benito Mussolini was socialist before creating the Fascist party.

They have the same economic values due to this, but with fascism everything is to the best interest of the nation. The one party rules the nation as long as possible, no other parties exist.

As with all systems, there is the risk of corruption. How this is dealt with depends on the exact system. A fascist form of government may take one of several forms. I would say that democracy is corrupted by people voting for individual interests and politicians looking out for the same. I think democratic systems tend to look out for the rich and an oligarchy of unelected billionaires is worse than a system of government that has a set of ground rules and courts to keep it in check.

re. corruption, using NS germany as an example, gun ownership was legal

except for merchants and other troublesome tricksters

Isn't Giovanni Gentile the philosopher behind it?

idk who originally came up with it tbh

Mussolini made fascism

there are a large amount of philosophers that have contributed to the ideological foundation of fascism, gentile co-wrote (or ghost wrote) mussolini's fascist manifesto, and did a lot of synthesizing of older philosopher's works

Yes but Benito Mussolini is the accredited founder of the party.

I don't so much support the Mussolini's version of fascism as, IIRC, it was government centric. I think government gets it's meaning from the people, not the other way around. At the center of every decision must be what is good for the people and government must serve the people, not the person.

Well yes but fascism is a one party system so its not good for the interests of the people as a whole due to everyone having different views.

@Pinochet fascism can't be socialistic.

It rejects it.

Yet its economy is

Hahaha.

It is it's own brand of socialism.

you are thinking of Marxist Socialism

Migueleby, is that the Venezuelan flag on your name?

Socialism is when the MoP is owned collectively by the workers.

Fascist Italy was economically statist, but there never was collective ownership of the MoP.

The Third Reich's economy was based on privatization en masse, these corporations were under State supervision, but never nationalized nor collectively owned. Hitler even crushed all worker unions. @Pinochet

@Pinochet the people are 85% NPCs, they're a bunch of morons.

@Pinochet Well, I would argue that a two party system is often just the illusion of choice. Perhaps there are wedge issues to keep the masses divided, but what really matters to those in power will be done no matter what in time. I would argue that capitalist democracies are particularly bad because real democracy doesn't exist where capital can be brought to bear. Capitalist democracy is rule by the capitalist, for the capitalist.

and by that I mean they don't actually know what's good for them, just look at all of the babylonian hedonism of the modern world - the lemmings are a product of the system

I mean Fascism generally doesnt work.

If I must explain why, you need a history book.

I say I'm a fascist, but just saying that does not denote an exact type of government but rather a classification. I agree that fascism can fail.

based

Fascism does fail.

Name a time where it succeeded

First point out issues with Germany's

The west is failing now because of democracy. It has not served the people's interest in a long time because of capitalism.

@Pinochet Fascism turned Germany into the second world economy by GDP and ended unemployement.

Actually, the people decided who ran the country so it served the people in the exact way they wished for.

Also based, democracy and capitalism built the country, but in a post industrial and ever rotting country we need to return to our roots

on the topic of fascism's economic doctrine, can I post a quote from a book i used on an essay for university here?

By majority standards atleast

all government systems have failed?

Reject modernity, return to the green top

Fascism also rebuilt Italy, and worked quite well till the Great Depression.

Migueleby it also caused extreme poverty at the end, millions of deaths, fearful citizens, the bombings on Germany to the point it was rubble...

Concentration camp construction

And much more

poverty in fascist italy?

'A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until a majority of voters discover that they can vote themselves largess out of the public treasury.'

Fascism but nice this time <:Dude:459545653031469068>

^

promise 😉

Yet democracy lasts much longer than any other system

And causes more benefit

Also true, until others start to ruin the system, there is noone left to vote for

And you can tell me when that happens

democracy doesnt last longer because of the nature of the political system, there are other factors that clearly contribute more to a state's longevity than it's political system

namely geopolitics

It doesnt end in bread lines and the mass genocide of your citizens atleast

I love American democracy, but i already see so much uninformed and squandered voted electing absolutely terrible people, may be fixed one day, but only time will tell

Give me evidence that there was poverty in Fascist Italy before the Great Depression and poverty at all in the Third Reich.

Fearful citizens? Yeah sure, not like all footage shows how Hitler was loved by the Germans.

Millions of deaths? The Allies alone of that time had killed much more people than the Axis combined. Example: the USSR, the Bengal famine under Churchil, American interventions, etc.... @Pinochet

>fascism fails
>nazi germany went from the biggest shit hole in europe to the strongest country in europe in about 3 years

almonds, very, very unactivated

because of who has been ruled by democracy and because the masses are fooled into believing they are free as they struggle to survive while exploiters sit back and collect the dividends. I don't take this self-perpetuation as a sign that it's the best system.

Okay, you just said poverty. You didn’t say of who in Germany, so the jews.

Not the worst, for sure

Clearly the jews didnt have money.

lol who cares if they had money

they're lucky they got depoted

deported*

^^^^

If there was some way to ensure that only qualified people can vote, without too much discrimination, let us vote, but having masses manipulated by the media into voting for fools and tools is an issue

thats just intelectual disonesty if you are really going to pick a demography that was targeted and persecuted in that state to back up your claim that it's system doesnt work lol

If the jews had been regular Germans, they would have lived like kings by pre-Hitler Germany standards.

Exactly. Which isnt necessarily a good thriving country when your citizens fear you as they watch their friends starve to death

Because the jews werent eating.

but they werent citizens either

so do they count as part of the nation?

When you dont have to pay to feed house and clothe millions of people

Ofc that money will go somewgere

if the jews werent eating then maybe the allies shouldn't have intentionally bombed supply lines going to the camps 🤔

^^^^^

Literally this

Not like there was much in those supply lines.

Uncountable jews died in Cocentration Camps when the Allies cut off food supplies and blocked Germany.

Maybe a few ingredients for soup and some bread

Cowboyism is hopefully something we can all agree on, the liberty of democracy and the community and tradition of fascism, one day

History > Your assumptions. @Pinochet

Those people would have died anyways

And you damn well know it

there was plenty in the supply lines considering the germans were keeping alive their mortal enemy, who were intent on destroying and enslaving their nation, during massive starvation in germany and fighting a colossal global conflict

it was kind of the germans to feed them at all

Yeah, most died because of disease and lack of food, thanks to the Allies. @Pinochet

@Migueleby 🇻🇪 bombing the supply lines or not wouldnt have made much of a difference, as soon as the jews stepped out of the train they were basically dead

It's all so tiresome, it always goes back to 1930s Germany as if fascists want a repeat....

@Similar Scowl do you believe that the Germans killed anything that had a Jewish mark on it?

Yes as if they weren’t going to be killed by the nazis anyways

@Migueleby 🇻🇪 they were systematically killed

@t r u e a repeat wouldn't be good enough

lol

muh holohoax

maybe not on sight, though often that happened too

never forget the six gorillion soaps

god damn it

Hitler panned to ship Jews out by and large....not kill them, although he did that as well.

you cant deny that the Jews were prosecuted in some form, but you can never believe a government either