AnarchoReign
Discord ID: 291691394710503424
129 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Page 1/2
| Next
"the government" makes this question far too vague to answer, you'd need to specify what level of government to be more specific. At the national level, it should be to ensure the rights of its people, both individual rights in the negative and positive, as well as the collective/communal rights
The one world state that I believe will inevitable arrive should be an ayn rand minarchist state
@The American Nationalist I mean i don't disagree
Just so long as their rights stay in tact
legal rights yes
@Doctor Anon It only grants you legal rights that are based on inalienable natural rights
@The American Nationalist Not always a bad thing
Freedom of Association is just as essential, probably more imo
Equality of opportunity and equality of outcome are indiscernable by nature, prove me wrong
No religious law, but Christianity must assert its presence in politics even if just through messaging with on the ground push for social conservative policies, conservative policies in general
I think we should make both the right to carry arms that can't be concealed and the right to vote tied to some kind of military training, only those trained in how to use weapons should hold them and determine how the state uses them in war for instance
For the question about positve rights, yes but i wouldn't term them positive rights i would just term them services, and really i would rather the state contract private agencies to fulfill those services as i believe they would do them better. As for big business, we need to de-democratize central government so that politicians don't need corporate money, or any money for that matter since elections won't be that big a deal, only local democracies can work because the people can organize on a much more easy and pragmatic order to hold politicians accountable for their corruption.
Ideally yes, because it does make the country wealthier and respects personal freedom to trade across borderlines just like private actors between states can, however, when you have third world nations that either restrict the rights of the people or are using tactics such as currency manipulation then tariffs can be used as a bargaining tool to make the country fall in line with economic policy that will make both that country and your country better off in the long run
To be clear, "it" in the beginning is free trade, and i was just going over some exceptions to the rule of free trade
free sterilization
Why are Jews at the bottom? Oh wait, that's bacteria, nevermind ^.^
yes
There is no such thing as a golden age for political movements, until you achieve your goals don't blather on about some rosy time where things were beautiful
Yes, through a one world state though, not through one nation taking it upon itself to bring up the third world
no unskilled immigration
Ive had thoughts of running for office, and my plan for dealing with media backlash would be to direct everyone to my channel and take all the shit head on
I don't want theocracy, but Christianity must be the guiding light of our government, the bible should be quoted often in congressional meetings
It would be a good idea, if not for the fact that the left will ruin it, make it way too high, and destroy the incentive to find work and actually put value to the currency of UBI
A right winger reforming social security to give everyone enough to live on would be a fine idea, better than the welfare state as it currently exists now, but it just won't be handled well
KJV, because why the fuck not
I believe we have free will, so predestination is a no-go, and i'm not even a Christian, I just know that Calvinism is not the answer
Evolution, that's why i'm a race realist
NONE
politics is a material order
The role of the state is to maintain the status quo, mainly through enforcing the law and providing all for all public goods and services that cannot adequately be met by private actor
Local governments should play a lot, mainly to weed out undesirable people who will cripple society with their degeneracy
central not much, it's too easily corruptible
@Bird Wizard Desti-steve is GenZ personified
Democratic socialism no because it's never been tried, i take social democracy seriously because it's cancer, and even though no one knows what it stands for, the few things it does (welfare capitalism, high tax and regulation) are by no means positive forces for society, at least not without a strong Christian culture to wash it down with
heritage, at least one of your parents needs to have been a citizen, two border jumpers dropping an anchor baby on our soil means absolutely nothing
necessary
no violates muh nap, bruh
spanking is not an argument
Pretty much, atheist jews to be more precise
go full heinlein, and only allow veterans to vote
fuck it
only works at local level, only equals can have equality, democracy counts heads not the contents within them
fascist and nazi are musused by both sides tbf
republicucks don't know how to use those words either
misogynists i'd say, given we oppose the sexual revolution, that means we're the only ones who believe in the sanctity of women's bodies, leftists are the REAL misogynists reeeeee
no not at the cost of culture
Only defend yourselves from antifa, don't assault them and give them martyr status, that's what they want you to do
in fact, stage events where "antifa" members assault your people, that's what the civil rights movement did to great success
the individual is the fundamental unit of morality and law, the family of the economy, and the tribe/collective/community of politics
All these systems must be analyzed with these units in mind: "does this law uphold the rights of the individual" "do these entitlement reforms strengthen family ties" "do these political reforms strengthen communal cultrual bonds
@Porpoise so did the commie, look where they ended up
the community has an economy, but the family is the fundamental unit, if the family fails, the economy will fail in the long run
families produce future workers, they invest in the future by nurturing the future labor force
because and individual cannot produce babies
an individual by themselves on an island is not an economy, even a group of individuals merely trading are not a long run economy, they can't invest in the future
babies are the future investment, without them, the old can never retire and will be in constant survivor mode
till the day they die
capitalism is based around the individual, hence sub-replacement fertility rate which requires mass immigration
ignoring the fact the social fallout of such a policy, that relies on perpetual shithold countries, and so is inherently destructive, or at least poverty is then endogenous to your model
you can't make all countries posperous, cause then you won't have an immigrant labor force to pour into your country
my college prof sperged out at me when i said mexico was just as much to blame for bribery as the businesses that did it
should have just said it wasn't my fault mexico was a shithole
whish that phrase had been popularized
it's immoral
i won't deal with sin because im not a christian
but it sets the precedent that nonproductive sex is ok, which i vehemnently disagree with, the whole purpose of sex is reproducttion
no, ignore the avatar
therefore homosexuality can never be moral
I AM GOD
(less)
im an atheist traditionalist
@Bolshevik Eliminator well im not proud of it
if only god existed so i wouldn't be a dgenerate
what made you convert
the left was always for intervention, they just wanted to be the ones steering it
also tariffs split both sides, right wingers and left wingers disagree amongst themselves regarding protectionism vs free trade
i would say military people are the most authoritarian right, engineers the most libertarian right, professors the most left
yeah, but not society
@Abiss there will always be exceptions to rules, but society as a whole requires religion to avoid degeneracy and slouch into liberalist values of "do as you please", while some don't require religion to hold traditional moral values, there is not a single society on earth that can hold them without religion and that is because most people don't have the time, passion, or intellect to "reason" why they're important
both, just because things are determined for everyone from birth to death doesn't mean the person isn't making a choice - the fact that they are capable of making another choice is sufficient for free will to exist
nah, birthtrends brah
atheists don't make babies
@Spookaswa how many immigrants do they have?
they would be if they did not import workers
the question's too simplistic - modernity has had a negative effect and that's what makes alcohol abuse so pervasive, alcohol in small amounts, particularly red wine for males, has positive/neutral effects on one's health
it is god's authority to restrict human actions, not man made institutions - so yes it is
well progressivism and atheism are not technically religions, so i can't list those
Judaism is not actually that bad, atheist jews are the real problem, so I guess Islam would have to be my pick
not as bad as the boomers, xers, or millenials, but still not the greatest gen by a long shot
then again the greatest generation did give us the boomers so ๐ค
only allowable for rape if the victim is willing to go through a police interview to catch the bastard, incest in which case sterilization should be mandatory if done voluntarily by siblings (if not outright execution), and if the life of the mother is reasonably and extraordinarily at stake
the doctor and mother should be punished with jailtime if they try anyway
also free sterilization programs for all people to reduce abortions and future democrat voters
@Commissar Femto that's just paganist, nazi faggotry. moving on
nazi = fag
get over it
@Commissar Femto don't give a fuck what you're against
your still are that
no im not
129 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Page 1/2
| Next