Just to prevent the breaking of law and keep everything in order.

Privacy should only be invaded if there’s probable cause of a crime or a threat to national security

Aside from that, nothing.

Forcing people to not be racist is pretty gay

Preventing crimes is the law, preventing racism is removing freedom of speech

exactly

@Victor Von Doom im 10

ok

Well imma have to ban u

I cant tho

good

Early steps - age 0-3 for in home speech therapy for late talkers etc is already fully funded by tax payers. Also private speech therapists are earning a high hourly usually $180-$220 hourly

All public govermental figures rescind their privacy

@Yandere-Chan Why is your age in any way applicable?

Should I deport herl

?

Unless its against the national security of the country the government should have no business in your day to day life.

i don't know

Yes

Bow knows what's up

minimal involvement. get involved if people are causing harm to someone else's life, liberty, and property. but otherwise there's more important things for the govt to worry about.

I like an authoritarian rule with freedom of speech

But it will never work like thar

That

That sounds like a good idea

If its against the interest of national security government should be involved for the greater good of the country over the privacy of the individual that could be a risk to national security.

but only in theory

Yep

I'm a fascist, so anything that is deemed to be in the interest of the nation.

So imma deport Erika cuz shes 10

Im just extremely nationalist.

@t r u e Also fascist is thrown around a lot what does it exactly mean?

I have read A squire's trial but it doesn't really give me a complete answer.

governance in accordance with natural law

Well, it's a hierarchical form of government rather than one that celebrates democracy. There are some "freedoms" to do things that are harmful to the individual and the nation that I don't think are beneficial. Extreme individualism is harmful. So some things democratic societies might consider "freedoms" would likely be regulated by government.

Seems like a good system, though is there any way to stop corruption at higher levels of government?

Nope its full rule of one party.

Its a dictatorship by party

Its for a state of national defense

@Victor Von Doom you may find this useful to read too, if you haven't already.

Fascism has a socialist economy, which is why I don’t personally like it.