Message from @Victor Von Doom
Discord ID: 521463029154578432
to Erika
Just to prevent the breaking of law and keep everything in order.
Privacy should only be invaded if there’s probable cause of a crime or a threat to national security
Aside from that, nothing.
Forcing people to not be racist is pretty gay
Preventing crimes is the law, preventing racism is removing freedom of speech
exactly
@Victor Von Doom im 10
ok
Well imma have to ban u
I cant tho
good
Early steps - age 0-3 for in home speech therapy for late talkers etc is already fully funded by tax payers. Also private speech therapists are earning a high hourly usually $180-$220 hourly
All public govermental figures rescind their privacy
@Yandere-Chan Why is your age in any way applicable?
Should I deport herl
?
Unless its against the national security of the country the government should have no business in your day to day life.
i don't know
Yes
minimal involvement. get involved if people are causing harm to someone else's life, liberty, and property. but otherwise there's more important things for the govt to worry about.
I like an authoritarian rule with freedom of speech
But it will never work like thar
That
That sounds like a good idea
If its against the interest of national security government should be involved for the greater good of the country over the privacy of the individual that could be a risk to national security.
but only in theory
Yep
I'm a fascist, so anything that is deemed to be in the interest of the nation.
So imma deport Erika cuz shes 10
Im just extremely nationalist.
@t r u e Also fascist is thrown around a lot what does it exactly mean?
I have read A squire's trial but it doesn't really give me a complete answer.
governance in accordance with natural law
Well, it's a hierarchical form of government rather than one that celebrates democracy. There are some "freedoms" to do things that are harmful to the individual and the nation that I don't think are beneficial. Extreme individualism is harmful. So some things democratic societies might consider "freedoms" would likely be regulated by government.
Seems like a good system, though is there any way to stop corruption at higher levels of government?
Nope its full rule of one party.
Its a dictatorship by party
Its for a state of national defense
@Victor Von Doom you may find this useful to read too, if you haven't already.