but your roles don't say fat and stupid 👀

stereotypes mean, by definition, that not every single person is 👀

to say something is not true in every example within a spectrum does nothing to discount a stereotype as a stereotype never is true in every example

thanks for... not disagreeing with me 👀

👀

ah I spot the lib role

am I the only one looking at the video

and going

"that's not a trashcan and it's clearly recorded for drama"

I mean all these comments on him throwing away or destroying a good book and I mean....

sure he literally threw it in the general away direction

but it's clearly staged and that just looks like the back of his car

I also don't like how hyped up people seem over it - he is entitled to his own views and... loosely speaking suspension can make sense on a basis of employee behaviour outside of the workplace not being what they'd consider to be "good" (this is usually allowed after all), but the video doesn't really say anything of his view on jewish people, ability to do his job, or any conflicts caused by his view in carrying out his duties/life

yet everyone seems perfectly comfortable jumping on the "lets end this man's career and, effectively life" bandwagon because of a video in poor taste

the point at which your personal offense and not someone's ability to do their work justifies ruining their life is the point at which certain people need to take a long hard look in the mirror

that's where they'll find the real intolerance

I should own the land

trump is a bae

his political position is bent over

annual solar energy? 👀

solar isn't even that good

ohh you meant food for plants, ok then

I thought you meant actual solar power

...which is pretty shit

solar will likely never be the core focus tbh

I'm hoping to see more axis systems in the future but industry adoption is slow

👀

why is the question auth vs libert?

the polars are auth and liberal not libert

it's irrelevant if people are or aren't paid differently for labour in communism

as what "pay" represents is vastly different anyway

anarcho is a synonym with "stupid"

anarcho-communism = stupid communism
anarcho-capitalism = stupid capitalism

see, proof

anarcho-Att

I don't get why everyone thinks communism has to be stateless

you do realise when marx blabbered on about no state he was talking about something post what we consider communism?

he was practically discussing anarcho-communism

it's also wrong

communism denotes political and economic equality... fine

this whole

stateless communism, which is basically anarcho-communism

is just... stupid

uh no

communism is usually built via socialism

anyone who thinks communism can't have a state needs to stop smoking whatever crack marx was on

he was

to me marx was "hur dur morals" and not a whole lot of logic

hardly, the whole aspect of worker revolution is a moral cause to communists

it's certainly not a "productive" thing

purely moral on what should be

marx was not very good at predicting history

he thought the industrial revolution would bring what industry still, to this day, does not have

🤔

patients need multiple beds?

what we need is a pay cut for doctors

USSR freezers were the best in the world

they had to keep everyone's food nice and safe while the people starved 😏

the case of the ussr isn't mis-management

it's mis-take

woltros I think you're ignoring a key aspect there

GDP does not matter in a complete communistic society as said society is "global"

but with a country which imports and exports

GDP does matter

profit might not be an incentive within the system but it remains an incentive of the system on a global scale

democracy is where you think you get to choose something but you don't

democracy is "would you like this bag of maltesers, this mangled bag of maltesers, or this bag of maltesers that smells of vinegar?"

👀

ye everyone is immortal

capitalism exists

LMAO

realcapitalism is not anarcho-capitalism

get outta here

lmao

ancap alarm is ringing

get the hammers

the form of capitalism you're discussing is not capitalism, it's anarcho-capitalism

I think you don't understand capitalism at this point

capitalism, by very definition, includes versions of "free market", but is not "free market" inherently

the scale of freedom varies within capitalism

capitalism is not 100% free by definition though

ignoring the point

capitalism does not = free market

free market is a concept within capitalism

but is not

the definition

of capitalism

no

it is not, lmao

what you're describing is anarcho-capitalism

then you do not understand why capitalism is capitalism

no, lmao

quite literally capitalist economics very rarely even advocate complete freedom

the state is almost always argued for within capitalism

by leading capitalists

both present and historic

sure so the majority of capitalists throughout history are wrong and sideisnothere is right

gotcha

it honestly sounds like you read the definition of capitalism on some american capitalist propoganda on the side of a tin of beans

att isn't agreeing with you