#shitposting (Discord ID: 398973785426100234) in Subverse, page 96
Security Advisory: Links in messages may lead to maliciously operated websites that could track your IP address and reveal your identity, or they may contain harmful files. The DiscordLeaks team does not check links and cannot make any statements about the safety of following these links.
Some ways to protect yourself are:
You can always count on YT subtitles to take a serious conversation in an altogether different direction. 😛
Ducks have rights, too
The right to be served with a nice cranberry sauce
Duck rights weren't something on my radar until I found out about foie gras.
what kind of question is that? with your stomach?
"Are you with the gays or do you like not starving" is how that sounds
Oh good, I was worried salad had been misrepresented in imojis.
I can only assume we're talking head first here.
"he little boy wore a diaper and pyjamas, but he had his legs and abdomen stuck in the woman’s vagina"
"The babysitter was interrogated by police and confessed to deliberately inserting the child in her vaginal cavity.
She explained that she was feeling depressed after her doctor told her she could never have children and wanted to know how it felt to give birth."
the onion got competition
I don't know whether to be glad this isn't some kind of fetish scenario....
Is it bad that I want to say, "It's the wrong hole to be considered shitposting" and then ask this question?
plot twist, the story of how someone get a vore fetish
Very interesting article this one
That guy who got fired does not sound so bad in that article imo
He doesn't to me either, but my approach to transgenderism is: We can't completely change a person's gender. If we can find a way to make a person comfortable in their own body before transition, try it. If it doesn't work, go for transition, but watch out if the person gets the "uncanny valley" effect with that person's own body.
Hi Tim 😃
as a transgender person myself, i actually find people who avocate for transitioning children to be very disturbing
they are kinda ruining the image of transgenderism, not to mention all the other problems weve had in the last 10 years
i think theres to much involvement of psychology in children in general
i mean beyond very frenge cases of children acting far far far beyond what we can manage in society i think psychology should stay away from them
its a developmental phase, weird unnatural ideas influincing that developmental phase is dangerous
another youtuber running for a government position
i like it
I can't tell if it's parody or not
Can't be real; he didn't land on a porcupine
Can't be real. The crowd didn't applause.
i clicked that video hoping it was about wizards, not sure why im so neive early in the morning
and now you are wishing for brain bleach i imagine
I refuse to believe this, really.
Helen confirmed it, I'm trying to find the tweet
Remember what Sargon said. If he gets a hair on his head hurt, the state is gonna get it.
And it won't be just a bunch of hooligans either.
think about the crowds who have been out to support him. then it comes out he is injured or even killed. He would become a martyr. It would fuel those who are actually racist and increase pressure from people who don't even like him and think his current imprisonment is bullshit. It would probably be the single dumbest move a politician could make.
Socialism works, totally
Let them fight
Sargon vs Warski in Arc
Couldn't you compare the transgender children debate to children/teens who want plastic surgery?
Also why wouldn't the parents want their child to be cisgender or at least be really sure about the whole thing? Being trans sucks, you can't have children, you will be dependent on medication for the rest of your life, you forfeit some of the functionality of the natural grown sexual organs and then there is of course the stigma.
lol i doubt this is true but its funny
@LEER they are trying to fight the stigma by trying to treat this as normal as someone being gay. And blame stuff like the suicide rate as being caused by bullying alone, hence the whole "speech is violence" aspect of things around such topics. And since they want to rewrite science, the rest of what you just said is clearly transphobic
That is contradictory. If you experience no distress over your gender, you don't experience gender dysphoria so it is debatable whether you should irreversably change your body. And I wouldn't wish gender dysphoria upon any person, so I will be hoping that it is just a phase, because there ARE indeed people for whom it is a phase.
in the minds of these people, a boy wanting to wear a dress means he doesn't like having a penis.
because they are more afraid of being wrong that it is just a phase then they are of irreversibly damaging their kid... because to call it "just a phase", in their mind, is irreversibly damaging.
these parents have been whipped up into such a frenzy of fear.
I bet most transpeople wish they started sooner though
We're experience reverse Mulanism. Our culture favors girls, so boys want to be girls.
They get more attention and millenials are fucking starved for it.
and society has moved away from a parenting as a duty to prepare your child to live on their own in the world towards protecting our kids from the world.
look at how over time the age to do things has been raising
smoking, drinking, soon to buy a firearm
an effort to keep people perpetually as children.
and when their child finally gets big enough that they have no choice but to let them out in the world, they turn to the state to keep treating them as children and replace their roll as a parent.
I am quite unsure how this relates to the transgender children debate
as a transperson who hasent even started yet, no i dont wish i started sooner. if trans people value phyical apperence so much they are willing to threaten the development of children for aesthetics, even being the children themselves who dont know the value of their growing up actually has on them yet, then i find that to be a very big problem. im personally against vanity, while i do have a value for aesthetics because that is part of my reasons for wanting to look a different way (not to metnion all the gender norms you get with looking a different way (which people are destroying ironicly while supporting trans)) i dont hold it higher than the life i experinced before my neural structure fully developted between the ages of 18 and 25. if you fuck with that stuff its going to have an effect we CANNOT fully predict yet and it doesent matter what you feel regardless of your age, adults who allow children to fuck with that even concentually is child abuse. at best even if we fully understood it, it would be neurological engineering which is fucking unethical AF
neurological engineering was made up by the cis-patriarchy
isn't being trans also made up by the cis-patriarchy? 😛
I deliberately chose the word 'most'. There will always be the transpeople who feel like their suffering is too much and who don't care about something like this.
Is it safe?
Whoa, I just subscribed to Desi-Rae Thinking on Youtube, and a recommended list of channels to subscribe to popped up
So, I just thought of something. Why should Blackface be condemned, when Drag Queens are celebrated?
can't remember where it happened but I recall Drag being banned from some event over fear it may offend trans people
because black people are scarier than women obviously
guess its time to ban Pride Month for fear of offending the majority
Jim carrey is turning into an Anti-vaxxer
he missed the part where its too much mercury in fish is dangerous.
if you are injecting thimerosol into your kid at the same level as you get mercury from certain fish, i would certainty call CPS on you.
turning into one? when he started dating jenny mccarthy he went bonkers
too be fair, when was he not bonkers really?
Give him a movie so he can work it out of his system
man on the moon 2: 2 the moon
Since Tim used to play MTG: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nhvVUOpt078
Man, I used to buy a damned Fat Pack every time one came out.
Since The Quartering got banned for posting Dank Pepes on twitter, Hasbro can go fuck themselves.
That's just an extra 50 bucks that I'm not spending on card games.
I think you can buy Summoner Wars Master set for that. That's more fun out of the box
Oh wait, nope, you can't buy it for $50 anymore
yeah i witnessed that whole banning, too, and i have substantially minimized my spending on mtg, too. i just draft every few weeks now, no buying of booster boxes
To be fair if you used to always buy fatpacks you now have plenty to go around and still enjoy the game
Meh, I lost interest. I used to help out in a comic book shop introducing people to the game, I was BIG on Magic. Now, I don't like supporting a game that, should my political leanings be called into question, I would be banned from playing officially.
Besides, between that and Comics going full SJW, the shops where you usually go for that sort of shit become a fair bit unwelcoming, anyway.
Thats a good description of them. They're "nice" enough but I'll never make a friendship at any of them because its all about what *you* can do to make them comfortable. I don't go there to work and I sure as hell don't get paid to be nice.
anyone shoot shotgun slugs regularly?
I got a strange idea
most slugs suck dicks through smoothbores
and I was thinking, how to cause spin stabilization with zero rifling
What if I modified the "wadding" base to make it spin as it's going down the bore?
or even, how could I reliably do that?
I was thinking if I made the wad two pieces, one half being technically a gas delayed blowback
that was on a literal screw
You have two pieces for the base that attaches to the slug, one which is the bottom that is extremely oversized, above 2mil or so
that has a "Screw" in the center
And gas ports
@CastleBravo taser shotgun shell has an idea to kinda do that. think of the slug like a small missile. https://o.aolcdn.com/images/dims?quality=100&image_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.blogcdn.com%2Fwww.engadget.com%2Fmedia%2F2007%2F07%2Ftaser-xrep.jpg&client=cbc79c14efcebee57402&signature=581fab9407c01c5d3c4b5b6a2a94d755e51ce896
then the base that attaches to the slug itself
with an inside threaded hole that the screw goes into
and the slug and wadding would not be super oversized, maybe exactly at bore size
so the gas would fill this "Chamber"
and it would want to expand
and it'd twist (if the forces can be made to align correctly)
then it would spin
so it's self-propelled?
that looks like it's fin stabilized
which is a totally different and even more painful beast
spin is super easy if you can get it to work right
I just like loading 12ga
it's super easy and there's a lot of room for mistakes
I don't see the need in dedicating a shotgun to shooting slugs (i.e. rifled barrel)
and the rifled chokes only work with some things consistently, not all things
so if I could design a gas delayed wadding that can kinda work and provide enough stabilization to give consistent 2moa groups at 100 out of a smoothbore
that'd be fuckng amazing
my worry is that you need to counter the weight of the slug in the bore
it is self propelled and shot out of a normal shotgun
otherwise the bottom would just spin
I don't think a 3d printer could make something that'll do this right
maybe I could try it on lower pressure loads initially
I wonder how I would be able to simulate shit like this
Fluid dynamics and physics
warez solidworks or some shit
What a debacle. This is what happens when you put Sweden in charge of a game.
O_o I haven't been on CNN in a while... https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/13/health/consequence-contract-parenting-strauss/index.html
It no longer works cuz the new parents don't understand it cuz they didnt get that parenting themselves
I think it becomes clear when the author makes excuses for not wanting a schedule. Kids are smart. If they see parents don't have power over themselves, why respect them trying to have power over you?
Raising kids is almost like owning a dog tbh. The other will just get by on their own after some years if you raise them well
7.3k to go
he's already at 3,547/10000 now
https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/328963109727371294/457197307306311680/DfopOmuV4AAK-P7.jpeg and they say the left cant meme
lol hard arizona. distrust the government much.
id like to see that map with %s of the total population of antivaxers in the united states rather than just population compared to the state, just for comparison
might notice how many low population states are high on that map
it would give a more accurate map of antivaxer distribution to
i wonder what the abortion debate would be like if we layed eggs
pretty much the same issue,
only difference is that its easier to perform
thing is any animal that lays eggs has to lay them regardless if they are fertalized or not, though i supose they would just choose not to incubate
might actually not even be an abortion debate in that case
Isn't the abortion debate about considering it murder to kill the zygote?
I think so
Yeah I posted about this yesterday. Should be interesting to see how it plays out.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ol6GA4dMZw4 this is an interesting video
When I agreed with him about the campus stuff I felt gross.
I'm a hopping mad left-handed duckhunter
i agree with him on most things ive seen up to half way through the video because i didint watch beyond that (stuff to do n shit). though i would personally like to get into him on native americans, colonialism, and the united states because fundomentally i disagree with him on the united states to some degree though perhaps we could make a compramise, i actually see ethnonationalism being something that should be a european fight and not an american fight, i think ultimately america should be held to different standards simply due to how much of a fuckup the united states is.
north america is the first supplimentary population of its magnitiude in recorded history
we also made it worse with slavery
by fuck up you mean melting pot ? lol
Our story is only different regarding slavery because we didn't use far-off colonies to have slaves on, instead they were in our homeground estates, where they were semi-integrated into a white culture. It was very much a part of our economy.
fuck up i mean the first successful genocide of an entire contanent to supplament a popuiation with another. a fuckup where now the dominant population of north america is one without genetic ties to its envirnemnt and would suffer for that without technology and ultimately adapt features of that native population. a fuckup where we enslaved another population, breed that population to a great degree until it was a fraction of the total contanental population, and then once we admited its unethical nature released them into the new geography where they had NO CHANCE IN HELL to compete with the dominant population economicly due to the native population having heritible wealth and experince with far more advanced technology and a resentment for that freed population but unable to justify getting rid of them because that would also be unethical as that former slave population contributed to the contanental prosparitiy
the united states and canada cant opperate on any other rules than a melting pot because we have no justification for not opperating as a melting pot that fits withen our morals
best we can do is be anti-immigration.
i might compramise with taylor to bulkanize north america into different ethnostates with the understanding we cant let this happen again
but im also fine with the way things are in north america too so long as we deal with illegal immigration and so long as europe gets its shit together and secures itself from annilation
actually australia might also be a case similar to the us
australia and new zealand
but not a problem for me i dont live there
I think you're mistaking the idea that history didn't just start after 1776. Genocide is nothing new, and undoubtedly there were people in the middle of Asia that will never be in any history book because they were never allowed to be written about. If you think history comes from a howard zinn book you're kidding yourself. And as far as I know, there are still American indians around and their pop hasn't been reduced to zero.
We're both speaking in generalities because American history didn't itself start in 1776 anyway. And because we can't blame our founding fathers on what the British and French did to natives and Spain's stain in mexico. Or maybe we can, since europe is just a cancer or whatever it is people believe.
i realized it didint happen in 1776, i just let you get away with it. consitering i was talking about the contanent
Americans didn't genocide the natives. diseases killed 90% plus of 2 million native americans and American and Canadian settlers fought for control over territory just like the natives did for centuries before Europeans even arrived the difference is the whites were more successful. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rL2XX_2tNk8&t=867s
Sorry whos claiming the whites genocided them?
Arch-fiend claim the natives were genocided.
I thought that was kinda not true. The natives were killing each other. Even bought rifles from whites to do it.
There were the infected blankets thing. Whether its intentional or not is not observable. Cant claim to know what the people doing it were thinking.
They did kill off some belligerant groups however, though I dont think thats genocide, but they did kill natives.
Not for their race but cause they were being a nuisance.
I mean, who wouldnt?
All very true mate.
Nah, I think you two just have a different definition of genocide really.
I'm bassing my reply on what he said here.
Yeahh not gonna take sides. Have a good one,
@Arch-Fiend Even if Americans did genocide the natives North America wasn't the first contanent to have most of it's population be genocided. Africa was the frist, if you don't believe me look up the bantu expansion.
you can cover any patch of ground on the world with a coating of lava, and afterwords eventually something will regrow, however if you cover it in concrete and asphalt, its chances of ever regrowing are highly deminished. to say that the native americans are not genocided throws out what actually occured to their native tarritorys which dispite how many of them died to diseases brought to the new world all native american tribes remained up until they were pushed farther and farther west by european encrochment. we know this because we know the names of every tribe in both the west and east north america, if they had all died we would never have learned their names. we also had atleast 3 wars with them, the revolutionary war, the war of 1812, and the indian war (basicly when we got fed up with skermishing them in the west and brought the military to give them the ultimatum to become registered to our country or be exterminated)
Yes Europeans did enslave africans but they weren't the frist and whites are the race solely responsible for ending slavery so if you are going to blame a race for slavery why are you blaming the race that ended it? The Arab slave trade enslaved millions more Africans than European slavery did, in fact the barbary slave trade enslaved more whites than there were black slaves in America. https://archive.org/details/TheHiddenHistoryOfArabSlaveTradeOfAfricans
it was a genocide, it doesent matter how many people died, we killed the genetic to geographic connection between a group of people to the extent people who had a genetic tie to the entire north america are now religated to less than a quarter of its total landmass and to the most inhospitable locations among it
this is the FIRST successful genocide on an entire contanent
though one might argue australia did it to but abos have access to 50ish percent last maps i saw
mostly because australia is half wasteland
Yes Americans did take land from the natives like the natives toke land from each other all the time even before the Europeans arrived the only diffence was the whites were just more successful it wasn't a genocide.
it was by all best definitions a genocide
the only more successful genocide outside north america was tasmania
hey aussie can you define "white genocide" for me?
So the natives genocided each other than?
on small scales if they ever completely whiped a population out to the extent it never recovered then yes
but im mostly talking about the SCALE
were not just talking about single countrys and ethnicitys were talking about contanents and core race groups
Tasmania wasn't a genocide. The natives in Tasmania lost 90% plus of their population from diseases and they then didn't have a large enough population to keep their population going.
you put them into camps after their population dropped from 18000 to just 400. wonder what happened to them in those camps
Yes scale is important I agree with you their but their is also intent. If their is a deliberate attempt to wipeout whole or part of a population then it is a genocide. So if their is a massacre lead by a goverment or group of people then that is a genocide.
colonization and displacement is genocide my nigga
They died out no human population can survive with only 400 people.