Dr.Wol (Discord ID: 227841188823040001), page 1
Security Advisory: Links in messages may lead to maliciously operated websites that could track your IP address and reveal your identity, or they may contain harmful files. The DiscordLeaks team does not check links and cannot make any statements about the safety of following these links.
Some ways to protect yourself are:
- Do not open files downloaded from links, and do not run any programs that try to download themselves to your computer.
- Use anonymization measures such as Tor Browser or a VPN.
If you are using the Privacy Badger or other privacy extensions, you may need to whitelist Discord and related domains in order for the images to load.
45,425 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Page 1/182 | Next
well thats what they said wasn't it? they're journalists when they can get away with it, but they're bloggers when they're caught being wrong
drive me closer! i want to hit them with my sword!
and yes, that meme is so old, Tim's beanies were still sheep by then
5? try 50%, people are as self serving as they come
nah, the cat should be named BBQ
Then livestreams are "BBQ and Beanies & the Timcast"
Best name for a show evaaah
they don't check that way, they just attribute those symptoms to whatever put the patient in hospital in the first place and move on
my grandma was given haloperidol after breaking her thigh, and she went all loopy from it and weak and dying, and they just attributed it to her alzheimers and age. Yet after we took her off it slowly after the hospital discharged her and she returned to normal for a few years before dying.
point being, they'd just attributed her behaviour and possible death to the existing symptoms if we didn't discover they gave her that at all and ordered the hospital to discontinue giving it to her
and this is from a dutch hospital who essentially perform the same as German ones
it was a private one, we can afford it
and it wouldnt matter if it was 30 times more or if Cathy recieved only 1 abusive tweet in total, the people who complain like the media will never achnowledge the fact it happens to both sides at all. and those that don't complain won't be heard
well the overlapping issue is that One side refuses to achnowledge it happens to both sides, and instead blames the other side
so the other side stops caring because they can't win either way with them
well, its cuz like in reality, 90% of the world just wants to be left alone, and live their own life without interference from outside
gamers especially, cuz they just wanna game, they don't care about politics at all or who's in charge, just let them have their job to stay alive and game in their free time
but the progressive left somehow decreed that a middle ground no longer exists, and until the "enemy"(whoever they decide nowadays) is utterly destroyed forever, theres only us vs them
well, its literally because those people don't care they literally say "leave me alone" and these political people barge in going "No! there can be no more aloneness until you fully realised the world as we see it", and these people now just hop to anyone that announces they'll make the loud political whine-ists go away
about walking through a fictional home and discovering messages about a lesbian pre-adolescent kid that ran away cuz she was unhappy unless she was with her army gf?
well the issue is that it was poorly made, had no game elements to it, no replay value and no "believable" message
so people just went "what is this crap and why am i paying money for this?"
and disliking it means you don't like it, hence you hate the creators suddenly because hating a product is somehow hating on the maker
making you literally hitler or something 😛
i understand you, but sadly the word "liberal"is just tainted now into being a crazy person
and the reason journalists harp on about it is because they need media shock
they can't break the news because of twitter tweets etc beating them to it, meaning they can't be the "first to report"
hence they have to draw an audience from somewhere else, which is by actually creating the news by making problems where there are none
then getting that bullshit pointed out, and whining about being harassed for "reporting the news"
look at Jim Acosta with trump, he's being rude, interrupts anyone else, won't listen and only makes bait questions, and when trump tells him to F-off, he reports on CNN "boohoo, president is mean to me and censors journalism"
because then you can see the game to its fullest, not just a 5 minute "what we want you to see" bit like No-content Sky
and on top of that, "games journalists" now aren't even gamers, most even tweet about how they hate gaming
And then they have to review a game like that Cup-head fiasco, where they couldn't even beat the tutorial and then write an article about "This game is the new dark souls"
Indies don't need games journalists, because they demand money for actual coverage unless they "want" to cover it, which means the game needs publicity beforehand, which if it got pre-existant publicity would mean it doesnn't need the journalists spreading it
cuz the actual gamers that buy stuff have spat out any journalism cuz of gamergate
so all games journalists will generate nowadays on games tehy cover is hate from a mob of people taht arent even customers
if it the journalists only cover the game its bad
if they go "look at this hated game" people will respond by buying it out of protest
anyhoo, gotta fly, gonna play heroes of the storm with some friends, i'll be around later
if they wanted money, they should've gotten loyal audiences instead of spit on anyone that doesn't follow the progressive narrative
and using that to scare other people from doing similar jokes, basically order through fear
dangerously close? its a verdict away from the act of criminalising comedy
in germany, nazi jokes are pretty much criminalised without trial or appeals
you 'muricans hold onto your first two amendments now you hear? 😦 you don't wanna end up like us Europeans, where theres no freedom of speech, and people are not able to do anything
thankfully your Trump is utterly destroying them at any turn 😄
its going to get worse, and it has to get worse before it gets better
act as individuals working together
If you can guarantee "any one" individuals rights, then everyone has the same rights
At that point it no longer becomes a question of "who's being oppressed" or "who's rights are being violated" but who's got the best idea to lead the country
thats because we're not educating people how to think for themselves, only how to behave
and at that point you can just tell them to behave liek you want
nah, intellectual leaders are using it as a tool
people that think for themselves are bad for leaders because you can't control them, a horde of drones is all you need
cuz you can use the horde of blind fools to keep the intellectuals in line for your own goals
wealth disparity and corruption existed long before capitalism did
i suppose thats why socialist countries did so well in surviving corruption over the decades
i'm with Revolver Ocelot on this
If people are genuinely as free (as we can give them without anarchy) they'll have an incentive to reach the top, they'll work hard, try to be smart
which in turn improves their country
and those Sh*thole countries are also there because the actual smart people from there realise its shitty so they move to the west, hence the west keeps the smart people and the poor countries lose them
it is, and thats whats causing major damage to those countries too, because when all the good and motivated people leave, whats left? weak idiots easily susceptible to corruption and oppression
Socialism = Communism with a state still in tact
but since people can't function without a state to help them, there can never be true communism
hence the closest to it is Socialism, making them essentially the same thing
thats why the soviet union is a "socialist" place but refered to as communists
where the idea is that success should be divided amongst everyone, so a "community" can become strong and wealthy
this has never worked in practice because humans are too greedy, lazy and selfish and simply not the same, so there will always be "better workers" that will outdo the bad workers, and will get demotivated cuz all the "extra work" they put in is not rewarded to them but others
this is why people in socialist places tend not to work hard anymore
it enriches the use of being a loser/victim, something the progressives mimic, because it gives them pity-points for power
sadly i think the current european politicians are actually thinking they're doing good as opposed to grabbing power
they've started to believe their own nonsense because they're disconnected from the normal peoples lives because they've been in power too long consecutively
but don't you see? thats how Muslims see islam comapred to the western values
They see their "values" as morally sanctionable and desirable
Enlightenment values is just another term of "our side knows better"
the whole point shouldn't be to find some specific values, its to find "the best" values, and we learn that by studying history and the world, and then say "lets not repeat THAT"
nah, those places became like that because they believe in groups. its a case of "your tribe is a bunch of animals", and WE are the true faithful, and our spiritual leaders decide who is right and who isn't
and i agree, the reason they're bringing their shit here is because we for some reason as a society decreed that even though for hundreds of years, our culture was CLEARLY superior and the one people should want to adopt, we tell tehm their barbaric views are just as wise as ours because "equality"
no its the ultimate failure of collective thinking, where the "group" is more important than the individual
under the current leftist "group" every single view is equal, and truth is an opinion, hence the individual doesn't matter anymore, what the group thinks, is what is truth
philosophy is asking questions in everything
collective thinking isn't asking questions, its accepting orders
they didn't refuse to accept, they realised Ayn Rand was stupid in her Objectivism
What we're doing right now is Objectivism, trying to find a way without emotions, no subjective opinions, jsut the "flat truth"
Whilst this is waht we would WANT to achieve, humans are group animals, and most are idiots
Objectivism won't work to run a society because idiots will gladly destroy it in name of whatever carrot a smarter person dangles before them
i'm not saying people don't have the capacity for reason
I'm saying that the overwhelming majority of people will gladly throw reason aside in order to be in a place where they feel like they belong (the pack)
yes and as i said, the majority of people will rather be just a middle person in the group than a shining person that asserts individuality
America the embodiment of objectivist vision, please
America is just as much subjective as the Soviet Union, the only difference is that they had the luck of siding with Capitalism
and notice how i compared it to the soviet union, i'm talking through all time
i'm talking before that too, the whole point of the civil war was that, where the confederates wanted less rules from the North, less taxes
They asserted themselves as independents, and the Union crushed them for it
thats bullshit, god didn't give people individual rights, the founding fathers did
they wanted a land where anyone could be FREE, regardless of their beliefs, be it spiritual or political
because creationists are retards that think god created existance
If god gave them individual rights, he sure did a nice job of protecting them for the west
Altruism is bull too, people don't do things out of their own kindness, they do it for a personal reward, those that show kindness do it because it makes them feel good, not because they believe in being kind
they don't, morals is just a word used by people to define the line they consider fine, and bad
what you consider good and evil doesn't apply to everyone else
it does not, what societies consider good and evil changes over time
I agree with the end, just not your ideals of an "enligthenment"
The way i see it, modern society just replaced God with Socialism
they're both lies told to people to control them
reason gimps control
If a leader can't have people removed on a whim, but instead be faced with "but theres no reason for it" they don't have power
this is why progressives only value "power", they consider facts to only be what the person in power declares to be true
If i say the sky is blue, but a person in power says its green, to post-moderninsts the sky is green
and no the intellectual elite don't believe in altruism, if they did they'd remove all forms of welfare, and only opt for a real "safety net" and pure capitalism
becausei n the long run that will eliminate leeching/weak people and only create a strong society that advances through competition
because people will learn to survive and learn they are strong enough to survive without a "nanny state"
no, they're the embodiment of "ooh look at how nice we are aren't we good?" its the Kind person al over again, they don't do it for the person being helped, tehy do it to make themselves feel good
Give a man a fish / teach a man to fish argument
Altruism is just gaining favor by showing how nice you are
a true form of Altruism would be to teach people to be independent and strong so they can live their life, find a good partner, and hopefully get children to continue the species as strong as possible
teaching people to be strong so they can find a mate and sustain themselves is selfish now?
I thought it was selfish to keep people dependent, so they vote for you cuz they know they can't survive on their own
yes, and then what happens when you die? they die too because they learned to need your help, not survive on their own once yuo're gone
this is why Africa is such a dependent and shitty place, because those people are dependent on our help, which in turn keeps them infantile, like children because they can't grow up and survive
why would they? they get free stuff if they're helpless
I wont argue that that is what people want to believe
i'm arguing that theres no altruism in keeping people in a child-like dependant state where their only way to survive is by your graces
A parent also values their child be able to sustain themselves, A parent is not gonna be around forever
they'll want their child to be strong enough to survive on its own
THAT is the true altruism for me
To sacrifice your time and life(work) to raise a child to be self-sustaining to continue the species
which is what soceity if its REALLY altruistic should do, not take someones hard earned money BY FORCE mind you, and give it to any random schlob that says "waah i can't survive on my own"
Communism is putting a gun to peoples head and saying "you're going to sacrifice your work and time for someone else" you don't get a say in it
which is why i reject your altruism position Revolver
but that is my view on it, Altruism is self-sacrifice for others, the best way to do it would be to teach people to be independent so they can be strong in times that need strength
Anyhow, as much as i love arguing endlessly and repeating the same talking points, its 2:20 at night for me on a Tuesday 😛 i need some sleep
I don't see how its selfish to teach a person to survive without the help from someone else's good grace
Holodomor is a prime example of that
people can't live for themselves if they're dependant on a force that can take it away from them arbitrarily
its not sacrifice if a person puts a gun to my head and says you're gonna work for others or die
yes Mr.Binary, thats why i think the true act of selflessness, is setting people free, aka, teach them to survive on their own
Heres a new perspective for you
How is being a ball and chain to someone else an act of self-sacrifice?
in other words, how is being the beneficiary of an altruist person making you selfless? if anything it makes you selfish, for using another persons sacrifice
why would giving someone freedom over their own life be selfish?
yes, i value my childrens ability to not be a slave to another persons whims, boy am i a selfish bastard 😛
and that lust and all teh other sins came from that
what if i WANT to go to bed, but people disagree with me on the internet?
if its a duty its not selflessness because it didnt come from free will but duty
Rational self interest to me would be, someone smart enough to abuse the welfare system, because those idiots forcing welfare will give you free money that someone else earned for you
if i don't need their money, but still take it, its for my benefit only
right, i'm off to bed, cuz this is just an endless cycle right now
this is just become a cycle of Revolver saying people are selfless for wanting to make people dependent on them
and wanting to make the human race better is a selfish act
and everyone else disagreeing with him
no, your position is just blabbering a bad position
Ayn Rands Objectivism is like Communism
Looks good on paper, but human nature will never make it work
We must go forward, not backward, upward, not downward, and always twirlling TWIRLLING TOWARDS FREEDOM
ofc i did, i'm the one arguing for the rationale here
also Tim, i'm so sorry for giving you like a 5000 message Newsroom here 😛
i'm gonna go to bed, you all have fun with your american time
naw he's just here to find the Beanie of Power, to destroy fake news
I wonder if there will ever be a moment, where Tim wears like a baseball cap instead of a beanie for a recording, and never adresses that change just to mess with peoples heads
just stick though it with your head down
students are a commodity for schools, they're more inclined to listen to the people funding them
well look at it this way,
if you're against their system of "equalityyyyyy" they'll hate you and make your life a hell
They wont listen to students cuz once you do, everyone will have an "idea on how to improve things" and it will just be bothersome
on the other hand, the people funding them don't offer advice, for them its "you listen or you're not getting paid money"
afaik, he UK is "ratting out neighbors" away from having a stasi
also i'm with Grenade on this one, best to keep your head low and be there when its crucial, cuz making a problem about it is just painting a giant bullseye on yourself
also you can fix discrimination in 2 ways
Get rid of the discrimination
Get rid of the people pointing out discrimination
One method requires years of re-educating millions, train millions and self reflection
The other method requires you to point and scream at someone and have everyone else remove them for you
also, why is it that every modern democrat woman looks like a man?
lets just say looking at them all, i wouldn't have guessed 🤔
i always attributed it to that tale from that childrens book writer
that a person with ugly thoughts, every minute of every day, they slowly become ugly
tbh, those people have no structure and control over life, have no meaning to their existance, and have no personality, so they define themselves by some pre-writen identity
i refered to that article from CreativeRealms, on those people who turned emo
nah its just attention seeking, these are people who hate themselves for not being unique enough, so they just go with whats considered awful and rebelious
it only becomes insanity if you keep it up after age 25
no im refering to anyone that goes from a normal average person with no apparent issues into a mental case before they're 25
who cares about trans people, 99% of those leftist people aren't even trans
sorry if i consider people who think that the length of their hair and shoving an interesting amount of metal into their facial region defines their status of how they self identify a fictional status outside the realm of mentally sound individuals
children do weird shit all the time for attention, why is this suddenly different?
yes, and i'll be sure to use arguments and breaking down issues when i talk to a fairy person directly
if they learn that, they'll stop such weird behaviour automatically, until that, nothing i say will change them, so i might aswell say it for what it is
if i call a rational person who's doing weird a weirdo, they'll just agree
so why do you take issue with that i said?
i never implied that, i said they have a very good reason, which is a lack of stability in their life for <reason>
yes, you ever tried talking to one of those rabid leftists?
reason won't exactly make them go "hmm good point, i'll stop being mad now"
i said that about you suggesting i argue with them instead of calling them names
the people you claim i'm insulting instead of arguing with
look man, you raised objection with me saying those children who went emo have lost stability in their life and thats why they're acting like that, they'll either fix it by age 25 or have some mental issues
and now you're just confusing yourself because of my responses to your objections
so me refering to "everyone that spontaneously changes like that during adolescent years" is a strawman is it?
subjective? we're talking about seeminly well adjusted people that suddenly turned into near-skinheads, with metal shoved through every orifice and claim they're a Quad-gendered octopus
so the point of this is that you're confused because i made a statement about a clearly depicted group of people, mentioned them and explained how they are generaly resembled
and you find that too broad, and therefore its a strawman
so you're saying that "rebelious youth" are not defined just that way?
Sponteneous Young Freaks
you said the group i defined, was loosely defined
i didn't say they have a rebellious personality
i said they define themselves by the current status of "rebel" which in the normie society is a freak with pink-hair and metal all over cuz thats the most common opposite of a normal man/woman in a suit, proper natural hair and a clean face
which is because they want to belong somewhere, but don't feel like they have enough individuality, so they just join a "brand identity" because then they are part of something
i'm saying that in order to have something they can proclaim themselves as, they go with what current society brands rebellious
they don't have a personality thats rebellious
i'm not, my original point was to explain as to why those people turn into such weird fashion statements
if you want me to be constructive, i'd say give them a hug and a better purpose in life than to pretend to be something you're not
fair point, "giving them a purpose" is too broad, make it "give them something to strive for"
oh absolutely, the radiation mutation could add years to evolutionary advancement
provided people survive
its better to like, nuke some really deserted area near the American border
so the whole world would be like "... is... is this reason enough to retaliate? do we... do we do something? what do we do?"
cuz no one is fool enough to make the first shot that matters
good idea Puke, we nuke ourselves, blame the Chinese and surrender to Sweden
tbh, if communists took over US the debt would be gone, because they don't believe in money
i wonder if the modern advocates for communism realise that same flaw in their plan
sounds like Manning sacrificed her principles to save face with angry mobs
Also in this vid, Tims lips clearly say "I'm pissed off"
but his eyes... his eyes say "read my lips" 😛
i dunno, i saw an interview recently that said we should act more like the lobsters
willfully ignorant "antifa left" supporters would immediately just REEE and call out, they wouldn't even dare attend a right-wing event
this just screams a deceptive motive
the left i'd say, by basically trying to virtue signal, like "look at me, im fighting the good fight, taking it to THEM"
and i mean decieving for personal gains, not deception to stick it to the left
i dunno i only learned this Chelsea manning existed today, and that its in fact a he
but googling around said he/she displayed interest in running for senator, might be trying to ride on some quick fame for being anti-"alt-right" or something, thats usually what progressives gun for these days
45,425 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Page 1/182 | Next