Does no one remember the fact that Reagan was an actor before he was POTUS?

True.

Disregard that, i suck cocks.

I'd pay to see that though

Oh dear god

https://i.imgur.com/GRH5U9C.jpg

Shapiro is a man with an excellent set of debate skills, but little to no things of actual value to say.

Oh he's definitely a step above buzzfeed

He just pretends his arguments have actual physical value, rather than just being moralist arguments repackaged.

While Buzzfeed just goes straight for the moralizing.

Rephrase, because English isn't my first language:

He's able to provide a bit of argumentative backing to his moral positions, rather than just straight up presenting the moral arguments without backing at all. That lets him pretend that his arguments aren't just, well, moral arguments, because at first glance they aren't.

Basically my opinion on those two

If someone doesn't know the basis of ST lore, they're literally of no use to society.

Ohey, a belgian

Stop being a rebellious province, rejoin your just and righteous overlords in the Netherlands.

And limit his movements too

The shoulder plates alone weighed something like 12 kgs

Basically.

He also couldn't use lightning due his cybernetic limbs

Sheev

His first name is Sheev

Do you know da whey?

It's even the case that non-English sources are blatantly stating Demore claimed women simply are inferior to men in engineering, @Timcast

Hell, the production company of the movie being referenced is retweeting the meme like crazy.

https://www.tenor.co/v9BR.gif

https://i.imgur.com/W1IcSgh.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/asMey7y.jpg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N16E37GN9m8

I still think Trump should have offered Sanders a spot in his cabinet.

He'd have instantly and horribly crashed the entirety of the media narrative against him

Obamacare is an abominable piece of legislation

At the same time I do agree with the goal of single-payer healthcare

With the option for people that want private insurance to do so, without being required to pay tax for SPH.

No, it isn't.

That.

Not entirely true

Kids are more likely to befriend their own race

They're also more likely to bully their own race

https://i.imgur.com/IiasyDI.jpg

Sweden.

Pack something to protect yourself, Tim

Nice

Tim covers cars

Then why are you going?

I've heard Montana is absolutely beautiful, just, you know, void of all human life.

Maybe, maybe.

Slightly left, progressive, liberal here

I'd vote Trump in a heartbeat.

No, the democrats are neither left, progressive nor liberal

That too

I'm left-ish, as in, the wealthy in today's day and age are the nobles of yesteryear, and that means that as well as their privilege, they have duties. *Noblesse obliege* is the French term.

I'm progressive as in, the current status quo isn't the best, and change is needed.

I'm liberal as in, keep government the fuck out of my private life, it has nothing to do there.

I'm also borderline absolutist on gun rights.

Against immigration from the third world

I'm left-leaning economically.

I think the rich should be taxed, I also think there should be tax-funded healthcare...

STEM should be tax-funded, outside of that you gotta pay your own college

Gender studies isn't STEM, because it doesn't involve hard facts.

Basically that

I also believe in the tax funding of things like culture, but by that I mean, actual culture and not modern art.

Also things like at least government-majority-share, if not straight up nationalized public transport systems

I'm this weird as fuck combination of left and right ideals

People like Sargon have been going 'what should our name be as a movement'

I like the term 'pragmatic liberalism'

No, no.

Classical liberalism is generally considered to be solidly on the right.

At least, in places outside the US

I like the term pragmatic, because it indicates people in the movement are willing to hold left wing viewpoints and right wing viewpoints on different issues at the same time.

I.E. no ideology automatically holds the right answers.

And liberals, because, well

Liberal

I.E. in favor of personal liberty.

Only in the US.

If you call yourself a 'liberal' of any stripe in the Netherlands, you will be automatically looked on as being right-wing.

Maybe extend it to 'Pragmatic liberal centrists'

But 'pragmatic' is the important part.

I wish I had a direct line to Sargon, but ever since he got kicked off Twatter

I've tried contacting him on Gab, but he ain't responding there

Yup.

Anyway, it's 2:15 am here

So I'm gonna crawl into my bed

https://i.imgur.com/3SWngs6.jpg

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/219565960976138241/401066144095666176/images.png

https://i.imgur.com/Iblsf2m.jpg

The problem being in the US, there actually are only two options.

CGPGrey did a great video on the problems with first-past-the-post voting systems

Basically, yes. Unless the third-party can win in their first running, they're guaranteed to never be more than 'voting for those guys is why that person I dislike the most won last time, so I won't this time'

The spoiler effect is real

No

It would require a fundamental change to the very voting system used.

From FPTP to something like Single Transferrable Vote

>Super sayian Trump

Oh dear lord

Do you mean, Republic Commando?

Karen Traviss is one of the worst writers to ever vomit words onto paper

One of.

Not the

Literally everything else she wrote can be summarized as 'taking a gigantic steaming shit all over every other part of the setting'

Especially her Halo books