wrong one

@Matt Christiansen http://is2.4chan.org/pol/1484126915781.png

Some will argue that the damage to the environment is more important

Oh shit I never heard about that, ping! 😮

>Crazed man
>Social justice
>Part and parcel

und?

Yeah, it's pretty silly. But at the same time, he's kinda covered by 1A if that's a thing we agree with here. :/

first amendment.

He hasn't posted any calls to violence or anything like that...

So, essentially, it's likely time to stop framing the holocaust as just an antisemetic tragedy and instead an authoritarian tragedy. I could agree there.

Maybe that's what our Aryan buddy is trying to get across: That Hitler was an equal-opportunity oppressor for the most part.

😄

I notice he seems to have left.

🤔

Possibly.

Like I said before, I'm a supporter of free speech. That means, if someone's saying something that's bullshit, you've got to fight it with words, logic, and the like.

Just had a conversation the other day in Hate Speech Room, I don't see that much of a difference between the two.

That's where I stand, as well.

Most importantly, I don't believe the alt-right should be made to be quiet. They should be challenged vocally.

Oppression is currency.

Revan, the counterpoint is this is a public channel

I don't think Discord would actually crack down on this server, though, unless it was tied to an incident like Charolettesville

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2AgEFIv4dIE This is how Tim Pool fights those he opposes.

Somewhat of a fair point.

Oh yes.

I know how to do that.

I've known for years. It's quite helpful.

^ ^ ^

Jaden brings the point I couldn't put to words together here.

When Tim Pool goes after the left, the Alt+Right considers him a hero.

When Tim Pool goes after the right, the Left considers him a hero.

He's kinda like Assange in that way

but at the same time

we can't just sit here and pretend only those who aren't affiliated with either side are capable of appreciating him.

All things said, this is basically a fan club.

If someone comes in and points out a bunch of MSM links with Anti-semitic relevancy

The absolute best thing you can do is challenge it on relevancy.

Sure, you can call for the muscle to get rid of this guy over here, Ms. Click, or punch them in the face, random Antifa guy.

But consider what that makes you.

I'm looking. 😄

@Badg3rman @Timcast I don't think that the number is exagerated, so much as the fact that the point is exagerated. In the channel count, how many of those actually have videos? I'd be concerned that they might be listing channels in the same number as users. For instance, I have two channels, one which I used to post and protect drone footage I was working to sell to a company, and one on which I was testing the waters in video game review. Both would technically be in that 50 million count, but absolutely have no place being monitized as of right now.

What about people who have created channels simply to comment on other people's videos, or used to post family videos? How many of those inflate the count, do you think?

Other than that, it's absolutely believeable that only the top 5% might be monitized. It's believable that only the top 5% of people who post photos on Facebook make livings from their photographs, if only the top 8% would consider themselves actual photographers.

That, possibly, or if someone puts one viral video up, they could become monitized under the old standard

I'm not certain that's the case.

I think it's potentially heavy-handed as google tends to be with roll-outs like this

I think the viewing hours are probably a fair bit higher than they should be

or perhaps, they should pay particular attention to growing trends, as opposed to a binary system

But it IS in their best interest to try to work with consistent content producers for their advertising space.

The numbers seem foreboding at that height, but perhaps if they were to go and say '300 viewing hours a week' as opposed to 4,000 a year (Roughly the same, 33h shorter per month though...) it would seem a lot more manageable and approachable.

That'd be 4,800 viewing minutes per month, meaning one 5 minute video a month, with 2000 viewers, crosses that easilly.

I'm not sure that they do. I believe that the ads are bought against content, not against viewers.

Youtube, ideally, is an advertising dream for niche products

That's why products like Tim Pool's own VPN sponsor seek him out.

Like he said, he COULD accept offers to push for video game apps and stuff and make bank, but in a sense, those advertisements wouldn't really fit his format, while something covering security does.

Many of the people in the free speech sector of youtube recognize the importance of anonymity and security, and so the marketing of that product to us is sound within this niche

a poor example, since they advertise natively as opposed to pre-roll, with good reason, a VPN is kind of at odds with Youtube's Big Data business model

Now, there are advertising models that actually track your internet usage - I know facebook does this

where if you visit a website, you're more likely to see paid ads for that website

it's more of a brand awareness model, where they try to keep their company name in your mind to get you to eventually buy

I'm not sure if youtube uses it, but google's advertising services do use it sometimes.

mmhmm

For instance, I just went to www.escapistmagazine.com, and I got this ad https://s0.2mdn.net/6232239/Cart-Abandoners-300x250.jpg

I've been recently looking for server space for a media company I'm trying to build, and bluehost was one of the server providers that I looked at.

That's a very directed advertisement.

I had to disable my ad blocker just to get an example. >:D

But no, I don't recall what ads I see on Tim's videos when I watch them on my phone (He does get ads on them there)

because I usually tune them out. They usually come in in the middle of a video... :/

as someone who's been studying radio formats, I have to say 40 percent advertisement is pretty steep. The format for most programming, radio or TV, is 25 percent.

Also, you could possibly post videos to your patreon ad-free, or with reduced advertising

Beautiful B-roll shots today, Tim. Also, the Text overlays are great.

He's talking to us in Talk Room 4

He's arguing with me.

Not with you.

You should pop into TR4 and actually hear the other side. It might actually sound a little less one-sided

It's like criticizing one half of a phone conversation

He doesn't have one either

that's why he's typing.

He's a poor-fag no-mic.

Oh, I'd agree, but it's slightly less insane than it sounds.

Looks more like Guile to me.

It certainly has a certain... purity... to it, huh?

Uh huh. It's literally the third image that comes up when I google 'Aryan'.

So...

Liam is basically right about Japan.

Also, Europe deserves the right to defend it's culture

But an Ethnostate has no place in America or in Australia.

"Passport buyback scheme"

Do you know how this works?

Because single child rules work so well.

@liamgb https://gfycat.com/gifs/detail/AmusedSlimyAfricanclawedfrog

^^

Agree there.

I agree that illegal immigrants should be deported.

@RJ They have broken the law. Multiple times.

They've broken immigration law. They've broken labor law. They've broken housing law.

and in fact, the employers have broken those laws as well.

The balkan countries were destabilized by Russia.

Which incidentally is still Russia's M/O in influencing the US.

LiamGB confirmed russian shill.

😄

Bitcoin is the bribe money of the future!