newsroom
Discord ID: 398858182455459853
87,357 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 19/350
| Next
That last one
if anything the last thing id do when I see an "offensive" shirt referring to primates, is to chimp out and prove them right
I am just here to make sure people are infromed.
When dispensing red pills, you dont want an overdose. Causes a hostile reaction
isnt monkey a bit dated though like calling an Italian a guinea
Yeah
pound the pavement
How long you reckon before tim regrets making a channel
Pretty much all the content creators I seen regret making them
๐ค who?
lol...
Tim's new video is up.
Oh, boy... The Gender wage gap. I feel like there needs to be a real study about the wage gap just so we can end this myth already
From what I've read, there have already been real studies disproving it, but the people pushing the gender wage gap completely ignore them
That's typical. I know the wage gap was created from the CDC study of the average pay of genders but even in that study itself it says it's not about discrimination, only about the life choices both genders make.
Yeah, the wage gap has been debunked over and over, they're just ignoring it.
Maybe they can't maths.
or actually read the study themselves...
No, they've read the studies. They just discount the findings by saying that the authors are sexist/racist/etc. and their study was biased from the start.
The wage gap? More like CIA GLOBALIST DEEP STATE PSYOP
Maybe we need a separate channel for so-called "conspiracy" theories?
kek I would be down for that haha
nvm we have the shitposting tab
Eh, I feel like this deserves its own channel instead of just being lumped in with general shitposting
Otherwise, possibly relevant information could be lost in the general flood
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/am-i-a-bad-feminist/article37591823/
hmmm... I have a feeling 2018's major feminist topic is removing the due processes in the legal system. They've done it in universities so I'd only imagine their aiming for a larger target now.
inb4 you're a misogynist for wanting a fair trial in court.
college judgement was always really not-formally-legal
mock justice
Tim please
you know the 31 genders thing is literally just virtue signalling
they don't take it seriously when playing the wage gap card
The way I see it all the people with new โgendersโ are either mentally ill, making them up to play the victim card, or both. Since victimhood is so profitable now it doesnโt surprise me that people would try gaming the system to acquire victim status.
Learned helplessness I think its called
I think thatโs more of a depression thing.
it's literally rp
taking it serious is a mental illness
๐ฎ
playing devil's advocate, wouldn't it be applied because for sure at least 49% of the population has an 'issue' with lower wages
vs the folks who are probably represented in < 1% of the population
IRL I don't know why it isn't being treated as a mental illness
I guess maybe sometimes the psychological ball rolls into corners where things get normalized
progressives won't make that argument because they would seem disrespectful of the struggles of being trans
Yeah I'm not a fuckin' progressive
but I would justify it that way were I in their shoes
that or equality of outcome for all genders
being trans isnt a mental illness, taking gender seriously over actually becoming successful is
we only really see the (usually extreme) trans activists in the media
Gender dysphoria isn't a mental illness?
Thinking youโre in the wrong body and wanting to lop off your genitals seems pretty mental illness-y to me.
^
not all trans people experience gender dysphoria
and even then, actually taking it seriously is the problem
like otherkins
If you mean that some people only claim to be trans because it's gives you social 'credit' with the left, then I would agree, probably.
obviously people are going to gain the system and do everything they can do gain social power
Yeah.
but it's fairly easy to tell if they are being dishonest or willfully ignorant, which IMO most of the trans progressive activists are
Such as when they deny that *biological* sex is even a thing, like that one college professor (I think he was?) up in Canada, when he was debating Jordan Peterson.
particularly not citing anything credible when it comes to the association between gender expression and biological gender
the most credible papers i've seen cited (if at all, most of the time it's just a shitty blog post) have little to 0 citations and/or aren't even in the psychology and sociology field
social constructivists are ignorant of the most basic psychological observation that a lot of our behaviors are not formed socially, you can see this in animals that can walk right after being born, insects in general, the gag reflex, sneezing, shaking in the cold, all of our facial expressions being consistently tied to emotions across all cultures
humans aren't special
we would die if our brains were just a bundle of neurons with no biologically driven behaviors
I've never seen anyone claiming biological sex is not a real thing
lol
flat earth level shit
so basically the argument relies on the assumption that someone that claims biological sex is real assumes they mean humans can only be male or female
and because genetic defects that break the usual male/female classification exist (i don't think anyone denies this) that means the entire classification itself is flawed
the article injects gender expression into that by 1. attacking the science that these people follow in an extremely condescending manner. 2. implying people that think genetics is a factor in society racist/sexist (by showing someone that believes africans are less intelligent by genetics)
3. emphasizing the complexity of biology and making the assumptions of the other side seem naive because they don't have the bigger picture (while not actually showing the bigger picture and relevant research)
now here's what i think
the classification of male/female is extremely useful regardless of the presence of edge cases
there is an extremely high correlation between all of the factors involved, most obvious being that men produce more testosterone regardless of the culture which has many observable effects that we can actually measure by injecting people with testosterone, have penises, don't have boobs, have narrower hips, etc
this might seem obvious to you all but not to the people that wrote that article
sigh
the only ones I give creedence to are the trans folks who have undergone hormone treatment and had surgery, and the hermaphodites
I guess they really want the definition of gender to change
technically speaking, science recognizes 5 different sexes, in terms of sexual dimorphic species. That said, not all sexually dimorphic species have all 5 normally, and all 5 are some combination of male or female.
6 if you count a genetic condition where the person never really develops their sexual organs.
geez just saw tims latest video. i have been saying for years gender doesn't exist and no one listens to me.
encourage that anyone can be any gender until gender is no longer a label they can since it will be the same as saying individual.
Pretty much.
i think male and female in mammals are only useful in so much as you produce sperm or eggs respectively.
well that's not the only reason male and female is useful. There are plenty of reasons to have it. with seahorses, males do the parenting and are relied upon for their strength and defensive abilities. With Lions, males are required to protect a pride, they do the marking as females aren't born with the glands necessary to mark territory. With some troops of monkeys, males are needed to care for children while the females go and find food. even in Fish, Cichlid males are needed to create the volcanic looking structures that the females use to lay eggs in because they don't have the muscular build to make it for themselves. female turtles are the only ones that are strong enough to drag themselves to land to lay eggs, female crocks are designed to be able to guard their nests without food for two months or so without dying.
but that is biological "gender" and thats transphobic /s
believe it or not, male and female gender in mammals goes well beyond just for reproduction, evolution for a vast number of species has made it so that if one gender goes out, the other won't survive without it
actually, everything you listed was JUST FOR reproduction.
There is a reason that different medications affect men and women differently.
no
that said, its not just for giving birth. it includes getting the offspring to adulthood
I doubt marking terriroty is reproductive lol
whats the point of marking territory?
to stake claim on food, water, shelter, saftey
To create a territory that outside invaders will avoid so you can safely foster young.
^
its a secondary sex characteristic for scaring off other males, which will steal his girls and kill his young, and some predators.
animals mark terrirotry outside fo breeding season
everything related to sex genes is focused on biological advantages to that species reproducing.
>steal his girls
Of course, I would consider food, water, and shelter to also be a part of that purview. They're both equally important, as you cannot foster young without those, either.
they mark it so that they have a food supply, a water supply in dry seasons and that they have a safe place to reside.
food moves
but it's where it stays during certain parts of the seasons
as well as how much longer it moves within your territory
Well, it does and does not. Animals typically follow around the same migration patterns. So while they do move, they also 'return', as it were.
Not that it matters as I don't think the sjw's are exactly questioning if males and females exist or more accurately don't exist, in lions.
ok humans
it's the same thing
when people look for a house, they look for the same things
accessibility to transit, grocery stores, medical facilities, things like that
some even go as far as to make sure they live near a police station
this is even before they even consider having children
not to mention they have criteria for the house they want in order to feel safe
it has to have no faulty wiring, it has to be clean, it has to have a garage, or whatever they think is considered safe
the male and female gender comes into play because males and females look at terriroty slightly differently but both in a beneficial way
men look for a house with all of the above criteria but, they also look at it from an emergency standpoint, if something were to happen, how fast could I get here, how fast could I leave, and how far could I get from the danger. Women look at it with the same mindset of emergency, but in terms of help. How fast can help get to us, how fast could family get here if I need them, how long would it be before help came? both are beneficial and both are needed outlooks
So it seems some are trying to form "New California" to break away from the rest of the state.
Not sure if it'll go anywhere, but still interesting to watch.
Sounds like it'll be a shitstorm. Can't wait
Old Californian here. Soon to be looking for IT work in New California!
I kinda skimmed through the article but wouldn't you want to move into New California because of less taxes?
i plan on moving
screw la if sd is in new california republic
i want it to be the ncr so bad
i mean california is the california republic so wouldn't new california be...
oh I'd move in a heartbeat. I'm stuck in SF bay right now but would consider leaving IT to get out
Yeah I posted about this earlier. Would take time to get used to but it would be good if it happens.
New Cali might give use more electoral votes as well and take away from Californiaโs.
I'm all for that.
i think most of the population is still in those coastal areas that will still be California, but still, a possibility
It wouldnโt change much but give us a boost.
i just think its great how the rest of California, is fed up with California
Maybe California won't be easy-mode for the democrats anymore.
It would still be easy for them to win Cali.
Easier actually.
Yeah, but I mean they would have to work harder for more electoral votes if this happened.
Yeah
If rural areas of dem states start breaking off it means we would have a lot less โwastedโ votes.
true true
and maybe dems will finally see what repubs have been telling them. that they do not speak for the working man
Knowing the Dems theyโd double down.
Many of them already speak against the electoral college as it is, yeah.
cant wait to hear what their platform is for 2020
โTrump is racist reeeโ
I almost hope it'll be Oprah 2020.
"lets undo the last four years!"
They wonโt talk about policy just about how terrible they think the republicans are.
Probably.
or just more hope/change, read; regulating feelings and bombings!
its so weird to me that 1/3-1/2 of the political powers that be pander to obnoxious intellectuals on the internet
a rather small number of individuals
It's going to be empty identity politics boosted up to 11.
intellectuals ?
The coast will be solid blue
I dont mean the term positively
but New Cali would likely be a swing state
more of those would mean a higher requisite charisma for both sides at least
but im more for just freeing those poor hillbillies from sanctuary city control
JBP had an interview with someone over his new book, quitte the listen:
very combative interview, exiting tho
๐ค not sure what the point of posting all of these is
Look at the guy's name and icon
He just wants to spam propaganda
i mean i don't want to play the racist card just by the name and avatar
Well, if they're actual stories and events, then it's not propaganda all that much.
yeah but they are articles picked with his political filter, of which isn't helpful
ah, okay
Yeah, that's true.
see <#398973785426100234> for a screenshot, he is only posting articles (from what looks like a racist or nationalist view)
not constructive at all
Again, with an agenda, sure, but that doesn't mean these things aren't happening.
as the world grows even the most improbable events you can think of will happen and be reported in extreme detail
it's constructive to analyze what causes these events but not just blindly using their existence as a justification for your politics
You don't know my mind or what I am thinking. Having said that, I'm not "blindly using their existence" to justify anything. I'm just saying it's easy to write off stuff as fake news simply because of the person bringing it forth.
The most you can get from any story is a supposed list.of events that happened in a order. To which you should go find an article that counters the first. Any events that both sides reference, are ones that most likely happen
Exactly.
That's why I look at multiple sources for the same story.
There is three sides to every story. The accuser, the accused, and the truth. The truth is rarely if ever on one side or the other
i completely agree, i wasn't trying to argue with you
Sorry, it just seemed that way. I guess I confused a general "you" for a specific "you."
If that makes any sense. lol
ah
I don't often make that mistake, but I guess it happens.
YOU ๐ฎ
***YOU.***
~~***YฬฝฬOฬพอฬUอชออค.ององฬาฬนฬซฬ***~~
zalgo
he comes
zalgo
Eh, still better than Cthulu
haven't heard that name in years
why does roaming millennial shill for gold and then ask for patreon
I like her videos, but it reminds me of lindybeige or demolition ranch
talk about buying gold for a minute
I guess I'll donate to stop the gold shill
VPN's now too
better than gold since it actually has some use
lol
gotta eat my words because I love tim too much
Hello @everyone how are y'all?
@MsNatSocialist I'm doing pretty well
I'm pretty good @Adrien Arcand
But I really want to know what you're doing @here
@MsNatSocialist I just wanna talk to @Timcast but he's not online
@MsNatSocialist so these Jews, hey?
Yeah, kikes... not fun
Greedy bastards.
Aye, settle down goy
Tims away last I heard.
Not sure when he will be back. Or if he is
Beanie Bros
beanies are all we have
and hope, I suppose.
Ugh, I hope this dosent end up with Tim going something like, whaddup beanies
87,357 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 19/350
| Next