newsroom
Discord ID: 398858182455459853
87,357 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 170/350
| Next
I only saw a bit more. It seemed to be more about taking a step back and thinking ahead at the end. Rubin talking about stop being on the attack an stuff
๐HIT THE BELL๐
It's youtube. For all we know, you have to hit reply to the third comment from the top
I think it's naive to believe that SJWs want equal rights for everyone. That's not the goal of the movement as far as I can tell. It just appears to be all about power.
That Gender Studies prof should be lauded for her honesty at least.
I think they genuinely believe in giving equal rights,
and to ensure that happens, they wanna grab power, so they can ensure in equality as they see it,
Ofc that includes having the people they percieve in power formelly, suffer like the "oppressed" did until an equal amount of time has been spent being oppressed
they dont believe in equal rights
they think the pendulum needs to swing the other way
yes, to make it equal
no
"its our turn now"
yeah,
"You had all the power, so in order to make it equal, We now get power"
no
thats not what they think
deep personal thoughts aside,
they want power to screw others over
or wait, you two were refering to Tims latest episode?
Tim, in the event they get everything they want, do you think they'd ever consider letting the 'pendulum' swing back again?
no
It's not merely making up for past wrongs, it's just seizing power because having power is better than not having power.
They can dress it up in all the flowery language and inane justifications they want; it's still just all about power.
in that context, yeah
They will grab power, and wont give it up because that can harm them again
The system we currently have is one of, if not the, best to ever have existed in the history of humanity.
It's not perfect; nothing is.
But there is no clearly superior alternative, and certainly no clearly superior alternative that has actually existed in the real world.
its not abou harming them
its not about equality
its about them living in yachts
the drones might believe in doing good
but the activists running this shit just want power same as any sociopath
yeah i initially was refering to the drones when i said they really believe in equality, hence our disagreement earlier
Maybe not yachts; Mao lived a very simple life.
the upper people are totally in it for personal gain
drones barely believe in anything
The Kim regime loved their comforts though.
But the common denominator is power.
drones believe in "doing good", they just can't think what being good is, so they listen to what the preachers say
you see it yourself in those on the street interviews, they're usually 2 questions away from having nothing to say anymore
"good" is socially constructed; if their peers all tell them that whatever they are doing is moral and righteous, they feel wonderful.
What we have looks to be the beginning of the bolshevik revolution
Well, street interviewers probably look for the most retarded person they can find (though it's a target-rich environment at protests).
I dunno man. The Bolsheviks were born out of three years of brutal freezing slaughter and defeat in WW1.
I doubt it, Bolsheviks were like "dying" levels of poor,
Modern western world made people too comfy to start a "bolshevik" revolution
This is more like Weimar Germany.
Though not as pronounced of course.
I'm reminded of this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HYhB4AaAcqM
Obviously Aydin is a massive partisan, but she does a good job of covering the post-WW1 political situation.
Weimar Germany with a twist
nah, but from what i gather, this is a new wave of insanity,
As i understand it most of these radical leftists, are the children of middle-class people
They're the bourgoise they want to depose, and have never fought a war,
So instead of the uprising being the workers/the poor/the downtrodden
Its the rich, trying to use the poor as an excuse to attack the even richer
Well.. I was referring to the Politics of the area, The use of Propaganda to put a core group in power.
That's part. There's also a crapload of legit poor, mostly inner-city blacks, first generation latino immigrants, and illegals.
Although, I do not disagree with who is doing it.
well thats usually the plan with any group,
Use any means (tell any lies) propaganda, to get into power and then fix it so you stay in power so you maintain control
The end result is an Authoritarian system which has to scapegoat a population. In this case it seems to be the CIS White male that is going to be the target of abuse.
CIS whites are the new Jews
If you read (or listen to) Explaining Postmodernism it explains in great detail how Marx's class conflict got transformed into the intersectional conflict we see today.
I lack a lot of knowledge in that area, Guess I need to hit the books.
It's free.
It's on youtube as an audiobook.
And the PDF is on the prof's website.
Cool! Will look into it.. Thanks.
It makes sense tbh,
The class conflict got resolved in the west, once we got to the stage where even the poor can enjoy a life, without fear of starvation etc
So they need a new method to goad followers
Stephen R.C. Hicks?
Be warned that the first third of the book is really heavy in the jargon necessary to tackle philosophical systems. Might help to write down definitions of terms you don't understand so that you can refer back to them later.
yeah, that's him
Cool. Grabbed it. Free on Kindle
I still have a hard time thinking in terms of 'epistemology' and 'metaphysics'.
Also you might want to save the chart I just posted in <#398973785426100234>
Got it. Thanks
That is a rather odd graphic. Liberal Capitalism is modernistic and socialism is Post-Modernism. Guess I am going to have to read the book to figure out the leap.
I think its cuz Capitalism existed before 1900's
And Post-modernism is the counter to Modernism
So Socialism came after, and was the counter to "the top gaining all the wealth"
Liberal capitalism really got underway in the 1700s with the rise of fractional reserve banking. Basically at the same time modernism really gained momentum.
Also, Adam Smith's "Wealth of Nations"
Basically set the state for the science of economics, or more accurately, the application of the new discipline of science to economics.
Prior to that economics was more or less zero-sum.
Iโm pleased with that Cortez chick winning. She was out spent by 10-1. Still won over corrupt corporate shill incumbent. Feels good. Gives me hope for the future.
Reminds me of the feelings I had when Trump won.
its gonna upset the establishment, "throwing money at it" is starting to become ineffective
I love upsetting the establishment.
like society is a biological creature starting to get immunised
Yeah, exactly.
maybe it really is all just cycles and biology
Maybe. Did you see the list of corporations backing that incumbent guy? I saw it on twitter, it was funny how many tweets it took him to fit them all in.
Well the problem is that she run on unreal proagram with no problems
Rn in us tou can promise almost anything during campaign and nobody would call you for it
She's just a congresswoman. One of 534. She's not really expected to deliver anything.
Yep
Its far from the progressive wave
Technically not even a congresswoman yet.
Though it's inconceivable that she doesn't win.
She deserved her win
The most important part of her win is that it opens the door for more socialists.
So the democrats may either have to learn further to the left economically, or face a split.
Its all those ngos who opened them the doors
Yep
I literally donโt care about her politics. Itโs how she got in without being bought.
It means any of us can field candidates if we will it so. Someone who will represent us first.
Agreed
So i watched tims video about her and what strikes me about her the most is how lazy program this was
It might be the presentation butthe amount od things she disnt talk about was shocking
its just activist talking points
Well thats kind of my point
Should be program
Not talking points
Like she talks about getting money out of politics but says nothing about transparency
Thatโs the thing with socialists. They always look at the end goal but never at how to actually go about accomplishing it in a logical way so it ends up being โI want to do all this stuff that sounds great and we will figure out how to pay for it laterโ.
Czech pirates have 100% publicly viewable finances. So you know how much money they gathered and how did they use it
they are making argumrnt US doesn't need military budget that iss bigger than next 6 countries combined
I would agree on that
If i lived in us
they say their program in EU standard would be considered center left
Bernie yes her hardly
Tim explained it right you cant guarantee jobs and housing as a human right
would like to know how much work is taxed in US.... we have 60%
(worker plus employer) ...
my analogy
or not analogy
but w/e
put someone in the woods
now guarantee their rights
which do they get?
they can speak, they are free, they can confront me when i accuse them, they can pursue their own desires short of harming me
do trhey get a house or healthcare?
no
a job?
no
anyone who says a service is a human right doesnt understand economics
Or reality outside the first world.
the left is going too far
Yea...... They do know the majority of Americans are against illegal immigration right?
โ I believe ICE has become a deportation force, and thatโs why we should get rid of itโ
Thatโs like saying โ The IRS has become a tax collection agency, and thatโs why we should get rid of itโ
Hahahahaha!
I like that they keep doubling down. It will just erode their base even more.
Normal people donโt want open borders. So yeah, itโs going to drive people away.
You know what they say, donโt correct your enemy when they are making a mistake. If they keep this up the โblue waveโ will never happen.
The quote goes 'do not interrupt your enemy when they're making a mistake, it's not polite'
Lel
The democrats are in a bad spot. It's their own fault. Trump ended up stealing a lot of people who the democrats of 20-30 years ago would have been focused on, and the democrats don't have any plausible way of getting them back.
They either have to hope for economic collapse, or hope that demographic change happens faster than expected.
This is why I support California becoming it's own country, it will only be a few years before they starve to death and America simply takes the land back. It would be a legal way to cleanse America
*its
Working class Americans in rust belt country used to be prime democrat voting blocks.
Those people are all-in for Trump now, and the democrats are basically hoping and praying that the policies Trump is pushing to help those people all fall through.
How did it come to that?
the inability for the left to admit they might be wrong
and the doubling down on questionable policies
and malleable young adults that lack the critical thinking that perhaps these aren't good ideas and not looking at history to tell us that
Youโve heard that the left canโt meme?
Iโve got a new one.
The left canโt change.
Thatโs why theyโre losing right now.
I think they are changing though
I think they're going farther left
look how far since Bill Clinton
who basically continued Reagan policies
The Democrats havenโt updated since Clinton. The way the party functions is exactly the same tacitly. Same with the legacy media.
They depend on large donations, celebrates, and the legacy media to win. Thatโs why Trump won, and thatโs why Cortez won.
I mean the platform
Sure. Thatโs changed.
tactics. perhaps not
we need. it the left and right
both
but like jbp said how do you know when the left goes too far?
btw Tim. your socialism video that's quite alt right thinking these days
also great analogy with distributed computing
i like to say it's also a result of individuals self greed and desires manifesting itself into symbiotic transactions
says another video is coming up. no video
@Deleted User I wouldn't say the left can't change. It did change in the 1970s, to become what we call today, cultural Marxism.
It seems to have become more and more extremist over the years
Well... why do people not understand that merely being against something bad does not automatically make you the good guy? There is the possibility of multiple bad actors fighting each other, that should not be too hard a concept to grasp.
my camera battery died
and I didnt have time to charge it
I was 70% done filming a video about ICE
that sucks
love your work btw
Milo yiannapoulos's paypal was banned
might wanna make a video about it, @Timcast
Apparently pokemon wouldn't exist if not for lgbt and illegal immigrants
Switchboard put him through to the president... Prank call
It just shows that he has the same views in public and in private.
Very good thing.
๐
So Soros is a big player in importing people that marry and have sexy time with kiddies, then Soros becomes a major shareholder of Netflix, now Netflix is under fire for showing kiddie porn.
Interview with a UK cop
somehow, its always the Joooo's
Aussie was right
Well its interesting how jeremy became this magnet for all these leaks and icognito interviews
Careful jayred, down that path lies weird hindu symbols
You hear some of the stuff he talked about on lbc (national talk radio) when policeman calls in to shed a light on some topic they discuss
But yeah its good to get reminder that when you meme or rage against the meme review police operation. Its usualy to top branch who is doing the stupid things not the poor footmen
*Its too late Blackhawk! I have seen everything! meme*
They can do that? @Deleted User
Did they give him back his money somehow?
I don't think they did. He got kicked because he gave 14.88$ to a Jewish woman
Oh yeah I remember TYT saying something like that
I found it hilarious that they explained what 1488 means
so the EU is now agreeing with the "far right?"
france italy and spain are calling out the people smugglers
rejecting ships
Yet Brittany pettibone is criticized for supporting the people who shone light on the situation
@Timcast I don't think they're so much agreeing with the far right as acting pragmatically in spite of the rules of the EU and the dictates from Berlin and Brussels.
The simple reality is, is that the EU cannot host all of the poor of Africa. That's not some far right ideological talking point, that's just objective reality.
no but they are now saying the NGOs are working with smugglers
If the EU bureaucrats cannot pass a policy saying basically "Fuck off we're full", then eventually the member states will be forced to defy them and do so themselves.
Hasn't everyone known that for years?
Maybe they didn't want to admit it before, but no doubt they knew.
well.. it is hard to deny that they at least enable the smugglers
How are the NGO not working with people smugglers? Maybe they aren't organizing the people smugglers but they are 100% facilitating them. No NGO and the people smuggling trade would stop
No different to what was happening in Australia with our NAVY, the smugglers knew the NAVY were obligated to pick them up. When the NAVY tried not to, the smugglers would throw babies into the water to force a rescue. It is the entire reason we now except no refugees at all and send them directly to Christmas Island
Look at the huge difference in NGO operations when the Identity Europe boat was in the water, if they weren't working directly with smugglers then why did their actions change, and why did they have such a problem being watched.
maybe they're all really REALLY shy ๐
No radar love for them lol
I've seen enough babies thrown into the middle of the ocean in my life, the smugglers and the NGO must be stopped.
I agree! Nuke the Midterranian Sea!
Gotta nuke something.
Kimmy boi has been building secret nukes, maybe he can help you two out
works in 2 ways,
1 it irradiates all NGO's, Smugglers AND illegal immigrants
and 2,
You can see them at night ๐
and 3,
Ariana Grande can perform for kids without anyone getting blown up
too late for that, dem people already here
can only ensure they dont get backup
so will patreon apologize to Lauren now that Emmanuel macron parroted the right wing rhetoric that the NGos are playing into the hands of human traffickers?
or that Spain France and Italy want the ports closed?
Patreon admitting any wrong-doing would be opening the floodgates. They'll stand by their decision.
And I'm pretty sure their justification was that they believe Lauren was doing something unsafe re: firing flares.
Though I think she disputes that it was a fired flare. Didn't she say it was a handheld flare that she merely waved?
I doubt they will.
they said she was trying to get in front of the ship
so the question is
is blockinh human traffickers against their rules?
probably still
I'm guessing so. Since, they will not acknowledge the difference. Even though legit gov'ts are now not allowing them.
remember "its okay when we do it"
@Timcast Enjoyed hearing your thoughts on the Ocasio-Cortez platform.
"If you didn't vote, you let Trump win." Thank you. People have been spouting that kind of thing since long before the election, and it still drives me bonkers. Apparently, voting for a third party or staying at home isn't a valid choice. I'm afraid we'll never hear the end of it.
Actualy
In my country you can give blank voting paper
To show that both candidates dont speak for you
To this day i am not decided which was worse
Trump or Hilary
Both are and were realy bad imo
Hillary ofc!
Trump is awesome
shitposter in chief, what more do you want? ๐
I think a 'none of the above' option would be a good idea. If no candidate gets a majority, clear the ballot, get new candidates, and revote.
Trump is awesome at buthurting msm
But his administration is one big disaster
Which country, @zutt?
Czech republic
and yet its performing better than the well organised Obama administration,
makes you think ๐ค
I am not talking performance but their actual decisions
Its rule for the super rich elites
At least it looks like it from where i am standing
as opposed to every other rulership
87,357 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 170/350
| Next