I AM ERROR (Discord ID: 240568987598061580), page 1
Security Advisory: Links in messages may lead to maliciously operated websites that could track your IP address and reveal your identity, or they may contain harmful files. The DiscordLeaks team does not check links and cannot make any statements about the safety of following these links.
Some ways to protect yourself are:
- Do not open files downloaded from links, and do not run any programs that try to download themselves to your computer.
- Use anonymization measures such as Tor Browser or a VPN.
If you are using the Privacy Badger or other privacy extensions, you may need to whitelist Discord and related domains in order for the images to load.
3,708 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Page 1/15 | Next
Never build a structure/building without something written that states that you are allowed to do so.
i would not even do that because it still could cause fines
i don't even have a problem with that. i have a problem with the fact that tlj had the worst script of any star wars movie and included jokes that would have been rejected in the "Scary Movie"-Series.
if anyrhing in that lawsuit is even remotely (provable) true there is no chance in hell that he loses that case.
well... i guess someone should set up a gofundme for the wall street journal so that they can afford hearing aids. They need them.
its a private foundation founded and run by the government... kinda
nope... thats where the "complicated" part comes in 😉
the basis for the foundation is a law specific to it
that law states that any party that is in the "bundestag" gets one representative in the foundation per 100 (rounded up - so 94 means 100, 101 means 200 etc.) represetatives in the bundestag
We should do Fake News Awards here in germany... only problem is BILD would get all the awards... "Traffic accident on the A1, BILD was the first to interview the deceased"
translation: the dead body of Bückeburg talks to BILD
at first i was aondering what kind of mushroom a tide pod is... we don't have tide here
Violence is not de wey, no matter if you punch or kick someone.
Why would you suggest that gizmodo writers are capable of reading? I‘m at a point where i believe that it is absolutely necessary to be illiterate if you want to become a „mainstream journalist“.
i think everything listed is accurate - if i did not miss anything.
you should monitor the views if you do it that way before you plan with the money
thing is, if you have the advertorials on a schedule people might skip those
hard part is to stay... how do i say that... authentic... believeable... you know... if you come off as shilling something for the money it might hurt your credibility in areas related to the sponsors...
of course it makes sense... but... example... ben shapiro talks about his sponsors and somehow he is using all of them... i really don't buy that... comes off as shilling for the money...
@JadenFrostwolf might be that shapiro is using all of them, but it sounds fake when he talks about them
tim worked for vice? next you're telling me he is mixed race and wears beanies 😉
what do you mean commercials for yourself? your patreon etc.?
hmm... depends of how it is integrated i guess... but i would combine it i guess...
@GingaBomber i think tim will decide for himself and just wants input...?
but in general the idea of doing sponsored videos on sundays is not wrong, i would only be concerned about the implementation of it... (self-ads would not bring in "outside money")
they'd just attack everyone wearing a beanie
where did we start? ah... ad-videos on sundays... yes, monitor the views, make sure you don't sound like you want to bullshit people, 30 second donation ads might work at the end of videos but not as a replacement of sponsored, weekly stream with a partner (that does not just agree with you) might be a good idea... did i miss something?
/pol/ is whatever the people going there are into at the time
i only go on 4chan if i'm in a good mood and have to call a support hotline 😄
1 in 5 is not hyperbolic, its complete bullsh...that would make an american campus more dangerous the congo.
in the congo it's 40% over their LIFETIME not 4-5 years.
i don't know what she says so i can't argue why she is or is not off
and the 1 in 5 claim currently is used for everything from catcalling to rape depending on who you are talking to
i looked up google where the most rapes occour...
and why is a survey about sexual assault cited when people are talking about rape
i see the problem with knowing that it happened while being passed out
i don't really care if its under- or over-reported, but i question the accuracy in general
(and just to make it clear: if you sexually abuse/rape someone you are a pos asshole and get locked up for whatever time possible according to the law)
well, there are people that think its rape when the woman changes her mind a week after... 😒
@cmdline but those people might have an impact on the survey results if they were part of the interviewed (that is my problem with survey based studies in general, btw.)
@cmdline well... voluntary response disqualifies the study completely.
if it's not random selection it has no value to me
nope. you don't have to work in a field to see flaws in the methods used in it
100 wolves interviewed said that sheep are tasty 😉
well... then what do you mean by voluntary response
men were surveyed but did not respond in sufficent numbers
i have a problem with the surveyed knowing the topic beforehand, that skewes the results in my eyes.
you recruit them first, then give them info in what the survey is about and then have them take the survey...
but they shouldn't be able to sign up BECAUSE of the topic
see, i can see flaws without working in the field myself 😉 if it's disqualifying... to me it is in this instance but that depends on the topic really...
i'm never certain of any of my critiques because i never assume that i have all the needed information
maybe i'm blind... is there a list with the exact questions asked and qualifiers if necessary?
how would i know the accuracy of the study if i don't know the survey questions?
"the large majority of victims of sexual assault are victimized by men they know and
trust, rather than strangers. " <- from the study
well if you can't get drunk around people you know and trust, why not just outlaw alcohol altogether... and yes i'm being sarcastic.
is there already a stasi in the uk or are they still waiting with that?
never click paypal links in emails. open paypal and look at your transactions manually
Fun Fact: Australiens are not part of the Aryan Race.
Yoz really think that you are getting anywhere?
@Deleted User just a question... do you consider jews to be white?
What happens if a christian converts to judaism?
it is currently not even close to being on the level that you get it accepted as evidence in court
you can prove if a photo was photoshopped 99% of the time... and you only have to prove that for a single frame of a faked video...
court of public pinion... watch orville episode 7... we are getting there...
the oxford study has pastebin as a junk news source...
...why not add google docs & github while you're at it...
i really want to see them correct one of their articles, never seen them do that
hell... it's like they let everyone write stuff for them...
i'm pretty sure the earth is flat. i just can't figure out what's on the other side and what happens if someone pulls the plug out of the oceans.
Black Panther is apparently the first Movie with a black superhero as the main character. I think i might skip that movie and watch blade again. At least i know that one is good. Thanks Salon.
Blade was not even the first one. But it's a f'ing awesome movie 😄
Okay... i correct that... Blade was literally the first Movie (Co-)Produced by Marvel Studios... wait... does that mean that Blade is part of the MCU? 😄
because the mcu officially started with iron man 😉
it's more a case of "fuck off with your race bullshit i just want to see a good movie" (at least if you're talking about me)
i see it with people talking *about* the movie, which is what lead to my comment
there is a reason why is ended the statement with "Thanks Salon"
and i'm probably going to see the movie on the 4th day of release (first day i can watch it in english)
i'm actually someone who watches a lot of movies in cinema
well... they are now fighting if 10 days is "soon" or not...
i don't understand what his obsession with "collectives" is
biggest collective would be the human race, there are a lot of bad people in the human race, ergo kill all humans... bullshit thinking...
no. centrism is only giving half the money to social security 😉
what exactly are they talking about again... i only understand chequered flag
i find it funny that dailystormerguy does not understand the difference between "no immigration" and kicking people out 😄
but instead of arguments they use insults
makes sense to post that link one half of the title is gone 😉
Who needs critical thinking if you can have critical theory...
that can't be true. have you tried ice skating while drunk?
dutch sound like drunk germans 100% of the time i have heard them talk 😄
you sound like you ate half of the words before saying them 😄
ahh... there's a nice word, gonna take a bite 😄
De dicke Deern drägt de dünne Deern dörn dicken Dreck. Da dankt de dünne Deern de dicke Deern, dat de dicke Deern de dünne Deern dörn dicken Dreck drogen dee.
but i don't have the permissions to delet this on this server 😦
"Armed Suspect robs convenience store" <- enough info to state which country that happened in. 😉
fun fact: i can't view that youtube channel from germany - but i can subscribe to it and watch all the videos if they show up outside of the channel...
channel is blocked, videos show up in search and i can watch them
i can also subscribe to the channel by opening a video and click subscribe there
because i don't live in a country ruled by a totalitarian regime?
public statements by politicians... taking them serious is about as dumb as showing up in a identity europa shirt to a protest that is held at the hafenstraße in hamburg 😄
Hey, not naming the suspect and the motive does not encourage others to do the same. They might lose out on ratings.
Yeah. But it would have to one of the big ones otherwise it will not have any effect.
Just saw Black Panther... good movie... cgi had its bad moments but overall good movie. Now i wait for all the bs narratives come up 😁
I don‘t count twitter rants by idiots not related to the production as marketing.
no need. The Press is doing their best to make sure that everyone knows that they have not actually seen the movie. 😄
like i said... good movie... but Blade is better 😄
and the Press... they talk about the movie and you just know that they have no idea what they are talking about because what they are saying goes completely against the story of the movie 😄
the audience score is WAY more useful then the tomatometer
i can see why people would dislike the movie... its "just another marvel movie"... but well... that should be obvious from the start 😄
yeah. critics nowadays are basically panderbots
which is why don't trust movies above a 95%
i don't think that would work anymore, given how long he is dead already.
heilen => to heal | heil stalin => heal stalin
antifa is the reason hitler got voted into power because they gave him enough victim points by physically attacking him and his followers. THAT is ironic.
and if you see parallels to the current day alt-right... that is just in your head.
antifaschistische aktion, or antifa for short
thats where the current day antifa got their name and logo from
i would not go so far to agree that history will repeat itself, but only because ww2 happened.
antifa, blm and so on are doing their best to make the alt-right relevant, yes.
bystanders... look at my avatar... and i can't stand antifa...
they have literally "no football/soccer for the fascists" as a banner in their stadium
its an openly political statement against fascism
then again, to quote myself: i can't stand antifa...
(we -really- had a problem with right-wing/neo-nazi violence back then)
that's why i don't align myself with any political movement or the like
and as a rule of thumb... if it ends with "-ism" it's bad
progressives are people who can not think for themselves
depends... there ARE conservatives that can think for themselves... not that many but they exist
but yes, both have the tendency to sound like parrots
if you give me a policy proposal i look at it, look at the risk/reward and then make my mind up based on that.
for example: i personally do not think that civilians should be allowed to own guns (with VERY specific exceptions). but if i look at the US it obvious that it is impossible to get rid of all the guns (especially the illegal ones) which makes the risk of a ban outweigh the reward.
gun regulation in germany: only for police, military, hunters (hunting rifles only) and security personnel...
and most of the police in the US would probably not be able to become police officers in germany...
yeah, 3 years training and physical and mental tests to before you can even begin training
recreational gun ownership is the same as "hunter" for me... basically the same regulations for both
hunter/sportsschiessen: heavily regulated where you are allowed to use your guns, what guns you can use and even how you can use your guns.
but you are right that there IS a destinction in the law
why would you need multiple w keys... only going forward in a straight line?
if things get crazy at the Damore event Tim will not be able to do a spontaneous live stream on his main channel
you know what helps with not falling for hoaxes? not giving a shit about what the media says they heard from random people. you'r better off asking your dog than trusting the media when it comes to coverage of things like this.
well... technically could talk with them while not talking to the press about them... which would be a good thing.
have you just assumed that i have a gender? 😄
well... i would have ALL the genders 😄
My notifications actually work so i watched it before it got blocked but yeah, i would have been confused otherwise.
Unpopular opinion: guns should not be available to the general public. Thats just stupid. But the US is way past the point were it was a feasable option to get rid of them, so talking about gun control is just as stupid at this point.
First half is based on principal, second half is pragmatic.
If the bad guy does not have access to a gun, all the good guy needs to defend himself is a butter knife. Or a pencil 😁.
(Please note that i see it through the lense of coming from a country where at most 2% of the population owns guns)
There is no sarcasm. I‘d rather be robbed then killed. There is insurance for the first one.
@Beeman like i said... the US is past the point where it was even an option to try and get rid of the guns. And you would have to get rid of almost all of them to not create bigger problems than the one you are trying to solve.
Or to rephrase my initial statement: the gun regulation debate in politics is stupid and useless, even to someone who thinks that guns in the hands of civilians do more harm than good.
no i dont believe anyone can defend themselves. with or without gun.
not necessarily... do you disagree with the statement "It's easier to defend yourself from someone without a gun than from someone with one"?
see... thats where i'm coming from...
they make it harder to defend yourself because they are more likely to be in the hands of the attacker than the defender
i'm more likely to win i a fight in my home without guns involved than with - and the likelyhood of serious injury is also decreased by not involving guns.
if i could make sure that ONLY defenders have guns... sure... might be an argument... since that is not possible i'd rather not have them involved at all.
in that example... yes i would contest that... they can't even drive anymore 😄
depends on the circumstance... in my home the knife fight, at my parents the gun fight
if someone tries to break in at my home they lose an eye the moment they have opened the door 😄
i would assume she would rather move out than go up the stairs all the time 😄
the general point, sure... i just see the downsides of allowing gun ownership outweighing the upsides. (and again: the assumption that you could get guns out of the hands of criminals in the US is just absurd which makes the conversation purely hypothetical anyway)
now i go back to watching hour long dissections of legal documents 😄
3,708 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Page 1/15 | Next