general
Discord ID: 463054787336732683
845,392 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 678/3382
| Next
Did you try giving her jello pudding
No i fucking moved her chair in and out like how u treat princesses
When she sat in it u no
Ya I pull the chair out from under her as sheโs sitting
Then I dab and do a backflip
Lol
i have them sit on the floor
talking about bitches ya?
Just so u know i was physically attractive in hs but still no luck lol
Sure women asked but i didnt even know they were there till they asked
Just that one girl i found bam not good for her
If ur not at least 7 feet tall ur never gonna get the Veronicas
Idk
Im better now tho
After thise talk
This*
Gamers rise up
Canโt, I am playing a multiplayer game & canโt pause
ok, save first but we're leaving within 5 minutes
I can see the headline now
"The bernie supporting alt-right - why we need to run clinton"
hey lads
wanna see the dystopian hellscape we wanted in action?
Will the mother get paid for providing the organ cultivation service?
good question
thats just disgusting
'Women pregnant with severely disabled babies could be supported by the NHS to carry the child to full term'
That means paid/compansated.
If they want to get organs, let them lift the bans on human cloning, and evolve that branch of medicine/science
Who needs organs from babies with faulty genes in the first place?!
I'm sorry people but if you anti-adortion you can't complain about this. If you are not anti adortion but still think this is bad, please explain why.
I just did ๐
and im in that group of people whos for abortion being legal and safe,
But you really should have it as a "last resort"
Lifting the ban on cloning still has the same problem. A clone is still a life.
You don't have to clone a full sentient being
you can just clone organs
not yet we can't. nearly, but not yet.
and the organ is fully genetically compatible
well yes, we can't do it properly yet cuz no one is working on it, its illegal ๐
Can't clones just do what we order them to do
C'mon.
Fuck you clones. Stop askin for rights.
but its that thing of
If you can clone an organ, you can have body parts replaced without having to take medication for the rest of your life against organ rejection
you can even have limbs grown back for you
It is not illegal to test it on non human, we are learning. It's not ready yet. This woould save hundreds of lives.
There was this movie that had this premise.
non-humans is iffy though
its like testing medicine on mice, we have plenty of things taht work for them cuz they've been made genetically "closest" to humans, but half of taht stuff still doesn't work on humans
Boring film.
Which had a trailer which gave **everything away**
And I mean everything.
O ya that movie.
The Island was about growing full humans for harvesting though, not just separate organs
Or growing humans for breeding.
Then they would kill them after they gave birth.
yeah
No it's not. The process of clone animals is exactly the same for humans. Cloning organs on a scaffold is exactly the same. We aren't there yet.
But not cloning for having orgies with 4 Scarlet Johansons... ๐
Sorry, have we already decided that clones have no human rights?
We are talking about the process of growing organs with out having to clone an entire person.
I was refering to the movie
I for this. Let them carry to full term and sell to the highest bidder. Chang my mind.
You mean with the disabled baby thing?
yeah
Maybe not to the highest bidder.
its just a stupid alternative,
since they're disabled in some form, they're genetically a liability already, who knows in what way depending on the disability
On top of that, since its baby organs you can't really stuff them in a grown person, so you'd have other babies that will be on treatment for life,
Meaning that with universal healthcare, you'd be paying for someone elses 5-20 years of life
cuz afaik, we haven't managed to give life-long resistance against organ rejection ๐ค
You can give someone 5-20 years depending on the organ
besides, i'd love to have 4-5 clones with me, so i can become a roaming gang of Dr.Wols ๐
The answer to our concerns is something we're not funding properly
Dead baby due to lack of organ or 20 years of life? I do not see genetic deficiencies as a problem. Just coz you're still born doesn't mean you are a mutant. Babies are dying at the moment coz it's not a nice thing to ask parents that have just lost their child. 'Can we cut them up'
Fuckin' STEM CELLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLS
GET THEM HERE
WHAT ARE WE DOING
yes. Agreed, But others are. We will get there. This sovles a problem now.
but why settle for 20 years Poppy? When we can give them 80?
I'll give you 60.
65 tops.
Alright 66.
But not a year more
67 is my FINAL OFFER.
geez, my lifestyle isn't THAT detrimental ๐
Take it or leave it.
I wont settle for anything more than 55!
Alright ya twisted my arm. 68, but you're ROBBING me here.
It's not guaranteed that they will need another replacement. Whats the problem?
It is guaranteed, since atm organ rejection is inevitable
not in 20 it might not be.
It's so cute when kids don't know what to do with their hands and they become Gumby.
you'd still be shoveling immuno-suppresants into said person
whilst with stem-cells and cloning you don't have to anymore, they'd be clean
Yes, agreed. But this sovles a problem right now.
We can do both. Legalise stem cell research and pay woman for baby parts.
immune blockers for years to come or dead baby? humm, let think.
one is suffering free, the other is moirder <:TimThink:482277772497125378>
you said you were for abortion
as a last resort
not just "Oh well, i dont want it now, YOLO"
Everyday we stray further from god, if murdering baby's is ok why is organ harvesting in China from prisons bad?
and that
I might be off and missing some pieces but jesus
If harvesting organs without concent is acceptable, then its only a matter of time before it starts being turned on people
i found a direct connection from Data and Society to white supremacists
hardcore neo nazis
This isn't a yolo, this is saving the lives of others. This isn't flushing babiess down toilets. This is using what we can to bring more life.
Video?
Becca Lewis is separated by one degree to hardcore anti semites and neo nazis
Becca lewis is ONE DEGREE From StormFront
Whose that?
i mean daily stormer
how
but actually yea probably stormfront too
i cant say yet but basically Im running backgrounds on Data and Society
Daily stormer is probably one degree from stormfront.
So she's two degrees from it.
She's not Bannos kid is she?
Tbh, daily stormer reads like satire
I don't get it doesn't freedom of the press allow these people there own platform? Does this mean the left is openly attacking the right to freedom of the press? I guess that started with milo
they have been for years
I mean, ive heard similar stuff in german TV and i think that was the third channel which is the states (yes, we have states but they arent REALLY much different, they are more like counties in the US id think) channel. The nazis where the front for german apples or something in these sketches buuuut tbh the daily stormer reads very similar. I cant take them serious i dont even know if they are
I have the impression they are elaborate trolls
And of course number one pewdiepie and new york times fans ๐
@Redneo I think that's what they are, I've never read them but anytime someone brings the daily stormer they say it's satire
wasnt pewdiepie featured on the daily storm
followed by the washington post
@wacka was it before or after the...... I wanna say times article making fun of him for being a youtuber? I think it cane out in 2013
sorry.. what was it again... wsj? ... wall street journal.. that was it
yeah just after that article
apologies to washington post ๐
just straight up out of nowhere - hey about those washingtonpost nazis... ๐
The splc is good? Na. They still think every man who is NOT a rapist is a male supremacist.
Becouse according to them, Pick up artists, Incels and MGTOWs are all male supremacists.
if there are any washington post people here I am very sorry for my mistake
So, if you can get consent and do have sex, thats male supremacy. If you fail to have sex, thats male supremacy. If you dont want to have sex, thats male supremacy. So, only a rapist would not be a male supremacist.
I mean, while i wouldnt have sex with men (or women at this point) have to say, men definatly are the better partners. Even plato figured out that true love could only exist among men
Women simply dont tend to love anyone.
They even typicly want to CHANGE their partner. Thats abuse
And hating on incels is really the most dispicable thing one can do. Becouse thats allmost ALL men
All men have been incels in their lives
At one point or another
@Redneo I like how men are bad stuff for that but women who have lots of sex are healthy and women who wanna be alone are strong and independent
It's almost as if it's just male hate.....<:TimThink:482277772497125378> <:TimThink:482277772497125378> <:TimThink:482277772497125378> <:TimThink:482277772497125378>
And women who want to stay at home and raise a child are male supremacist
Though the ones who identify as incels are typicly what youd call virgins. Often due to disability, women dont like men in wheelchairs
Naw, more like mental handicapped or extremely social awkward
That, too
@Redneo that's ok women can choose who they want....... <:TimThink:482277772497125378> <:TimThink:482277772497125378> <:TimThink:482277772497125378> <:TimThink:482277772497125378>
But thats also a RESULT of being an incel
We know how touch deprivation affects people
Its a desaster
It even physicly cripples people if they are touch deprived as children
They are mentality handicap and socially awkward because they are incels? I don't think you've met enough nerds before they leave high school
@tmg copper yeah they can, im not opposing that
@tmg copper but hating on the ones they dont choose?
I don't think being an "incel" between 15-17 counts
@Grenade123 its not between 15 and 17. Every man is an incel at some point
Every person is
He may even be in a relationship but on a business trip. If hed like to have sex at that point, hes an incel.
That is painting the term incel with a very wide brush
Well it is literally the abbreviation for involuntary celibate so, yes.
Some terms literally are a noun to a verb
Well the key word is celibate and how you define it
For instance, if you want people including men not to be tortured, that does make you a mens rights advocate.
becouse you are literally engaged in doing what that noun describes
Doing the verb to the noun
(if you also want women not to be tortured, you are of course also a WRA)
#stopthebias https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1OwPeOonzU
"abstaining from marriage and sexual relations, typically for religious reasons"
In the term incel, I believe that extents to abstaining from relationships period, involuntary of course
@Redneo bingo, sorry I walked away from my phone.
The point of the term incel is that they can't even get a date, yet alone anything more.
Yeah i guess you can argue about what celibacy means, yes.
@Grenade123 but what I think @Redneo is arguing is that it's involuntary
Well yeah, you cant blame something for what he doesnt even want
Espacialy as women call men which dont put out MURDERERS.
I think it was a guardian or NYT article calling men which are not available murderers becouse your life is shorter if you are alone
what would you think if someone defended a neo nazi as not really racist but just trying to have a laugh
I don't disagree that making fun of incels is at all a good idea, it's like making fun of anyone based on immutable characteristics.
because thats Data and Society
describing Daily Stormer as just for a joke
Well i would describe it as such
do you thnk the average person would agree that its not real nazism
It just reads like satire
right but they arent saying its meant to be fake
they are saying "this guy is racist and has a nazi tattoo, but its not for real ya know"
I mean what do you mean by "defend"? I would defend their rights
defend their actions as not racism just jokes
like getting a nazi tattoo, that was just for a laugh according to them
Sounds like they don't take them seriously. Which if they are trying to pain people like you and Sargon as serious but the daily stormer as not, I'd have to question if they are really neo-nazi supporters.
maybe its the ancient indian hidnu symbol of peace tim ๐
I wouldnt defend a neo nazi tatoo as not racist, their articles seem to be satire, might have the opposite goal. At least id argue itll have the opposite effect.
die bart, die
In the end, i dont care to much if they are racist or not. So long as they dont hurt anyone - and if they do i dont care what they believe.
people should be able to express whatever opinions they want... and I should be free to tell them their opinion is stupid
right
should data and society be allowed to claim that liberals and centrists are connected to nazis when they are actually closer and have spoken in their defense?
:shirt: Check out **Tim Pool's TeeSpring Merch**:
<https://teespring.com/stores/timcast>
:dollar: Support **Tim Pool** on Patreon (exclusive rewards available):
<https://www.patreon.com/timcast>
That sounds like a defamation suit waiting to happen
yes... and when they are proven wrong... it takes away all their credibility
Though they seem to have framed it carefully using a snowball system at least thats what they claim
Problem is
they cant have employed a snowball system
as long as the counter of their "data" has an equal voice... it will only discredit data & society
Becouse if they did employ a snowball system, they would have people like lacy green on their hatemap
After all, they do have chris raygun
doctor layman explained how a snowball system works here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ocEIq3DHEb4&t=0s
it doesnt matter... if their whole foundation is based on provable lies.. the whole thing falls apart
and it does more to hurt them
that basically how trump got elected
nobody trusted the MSM anymore
Basicly it means you investigate everyone connected to someone else and connected to them and so on - strangely, they didnt list any leftists that were speaking to those on the hatemap
nobodies going to vote for you... if you come out with a bare faced obvious lie
and the more they double down on this... the more credibility it erases
its like when someone tells a fib... and then doubles down with a lie.. and more lies and it grows and grows until they cant turn back... until it all falls apart
The ADL should really take action against the defamation by data and society and the SPLC ๐
You're approaching this as someone who is outside the progressive bubble and knows that most of the people on *the list* are not white supremacists or white nationalists. From the perspective of someone inside the progressive bubble (like people high in Youtube's corporate hierarchy), this Data Society report looks like a confirmation of their worst fears.
depends how you look at it... if some people get more famous from this.. and seen in a good light (to be part of this diverse group of thinkers) it can be seen as the opposite of defamation
its a multi-racial mutli-gendered +trans group of left-wing/right-wing people
+centrists
multi religion too
It was them who said in their report that those people are "selfidentified members of the intellectual dark web", too, right? That term actualy originated as a smear
Not aware of any of them actualy using the term but im not following most of them
But i havent heard any of the ones i do follow use the term
to unironicly describe themselves anyways
Tim does have a tat under that beanie????
I think Rubin embraces the term but the others only employ it ironically.
beanie no matter i'd [pat tims head ngl
@R9b1t tim's just got a receeding hairline that nobody wants to expose
happened once at a something
tim should just start wearing hats under his hat
plz no bully tims hairline
<:nolewd:490963599389491201>
@King Canuck it happened once at a something, sounds legit<:TimThink:482277772497125378> <:TimThink:482277772497125378> <:TimThink:482277772497125378>
some rally or protest
someone took his hat
mid-stream
@King Canuck oh I believe you<:TimThink:482277772497125378>
I actually remember this but not a clear image of tim
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1043126336473055235
absolute mad lad
'Charge him with a crime I dare you'
"But some people are afraid of going to the police!" or "The police wont do anything!"
Do it I fucking dare you
Now here's the thing
it's certainly possile that a drunk kavavavav groped a lady
as a wasted 20something year old
but you have no evidence or corroborating witnesses lady
and no police report
If an accusation was filed with police I don't think the Maryland DA would be able to ***not*** file charges, because doing otherwise would be political suicide for him.
Then again, the police might look at this and simply dismiss it. No time, date, place, witnesses, or physical evidence.
esp wirh if it happened, then statute of limitations wouldve run out years ago
No statute of limitations for sexual assault in MD
845,392 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 678/3382
| Next