Message from @Redneo
Discord ID: 492668169853599744
should data and society be allowed to claim that liberals and centrists are connected to nazis when they are actually closer and have spoken in their defense?
:shirt: Check out **Tim Pool's TeeSpring Merch**:
<https://teespring.com/stores/timcast>
:dollar: Support **Tim Pool** on Patreon (exclusive rewards available):
<https://www.patreon.com/timcast>
That sounds like a defamation suit waiting to happen
yes... and when they are proven wrong... it takes away all their credibility
Though they seem to have framed it carefully using a snowball system at least thats what they claim
Problem is
they cant have employed a snowball system
as long as the counter of their "data" has an equal voice... it will only discredit data & society
Becouse if they did employ a snowball system, they would have people like lacy green on their hatemap
After all, they do have chris raygun
doctor layman explained how a snowball system works here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ocEIq3DHEb4&t=0s
it doesnt matter... if their whole foundation is based on provable lies.. the whole thing falls apart
and it does more to hurt them
that basically how trump got elected
nobody trusted the MSM anymore
Basicly it means you investigate everyone connected to someone else and connected to them and so on - strangely, they didnt list any leftists that were speaking to those on the hatemap
nobodies going to vote for you... if you come out with a bare faced obvious lie
and the more they double down on this... the more credibility it erases
its like when someone tells a fib... and then doubles down with a lie.. and more lies and it grows and grows until they cant turn back... until it all falls apart
You're approaching this as someone who is outside the progressive bubble and knows that most of the people on *the list* are not white supremacists or white nationalists. From the perspective of someone inside the progressive bubble (like people high in Youtube's corporate hierarchy), this Data Society report looks like a confirmation of their worst fears.
depends how you look at it... if some people get more famous from this.. and seen in a good light (to be part of this diverse group of thinkers) it can be seen as the opposite of defamation
its a multi-racial mutli-gendered +trans group of left-wing/right-wing people
+centrists
multi religion too
It was them who said in their report that those people are "selfidentified members of the intellectual dark web", too, right? That term actualy originated as a smear
Not aware of any of them actualy using the term but im not following most of them
But i havent heard any of the ones i do follow use the term
to unironicly describe themselves anyways
Tim does have a tat under that beanie????
I think Rubin embraces the term but the others only employ it ironically.
beanie no matter i'd [pat tims head ngl
@R9b1t tim's just got a receeding hairline that nobody wants to expose
happened once at a something
tim should just start wearing hats under his hat
plz no bully tims hairline
<:nolewd:490963599389491201>
@King Canuck it happened once at a something, sounds legit<:TimThink:482277772497125378> <:TimThink:482277772497125378> <:TimThink:482277772497125378>
some rally or protest
someone took his hat