Message from @Dr.Wol

Discord ID: 492640751054749706


2018-09-21 10:11:04 UTC  

There was this movie that had this premise.

2018-09-21 10:11:10 UTC  

non-humans is iffy though

its like testing medicine on mice, we have plenty of things taht work for them cuz they've been made genetically "closest" to humans, but half of taht stuff still doesn't work on humans

2018-09-21 10:11:11 UTC  

Boring film.

2018-09-21 10:11:12 UTC  

Which had a trailer which gave **everything away**

2018-09-21 10:11:19 UTC  

And I mean everything.

2018-09-21 10:11:23 UTC  

O ya that movie.

2018-09-21 10:11:25 UTC  

The Island was about growing full humans for harvesting though, not just separate organs

2018-09-21 10:11:44 UTC  

Or growing humans for breeding.

2018-09-21 10:11:57 UTC  

Then they would kill them after they gave birth.

2018-09-21 10:12:00 UTC  

yeah

2018-09-21 10:12:24 UTC  

No it's not. The process of clone animals is exactly the same for humans. Cloning organs on a scaffold is exactly the same. We aren't there yet.

2018-09-21 10:12:32 UTC  

But not cloning for having orgies with 4 Scarlet Johansons... 😒

2018-09-21 10:13:23 UTC  

Sorry, have we already decided that clones have no human rights?

2018-09-21 10:14:02 UTC  

We are talking about the process of growing organs with out having to clone an entire person.

2018-09-21 10:14:51 UTC  

I was refering to the movie

2018-09-21 10:14:56 UTC  

I for this. Let them carry to full term and sell to the highest bidder. Chang my mind.

2018-09-21 10:15:25 UTC  

You mean with the disabled baby thing?

2018-09-21 10:17:09 UTC  

yeah

2018-09-21 10:17:26 UTC  

Maybe not to the highest bidder.

2018-09-21 10:17:44 UTC  

its just a stupid alternative,

since they're disabled in some form, they're genetically a liability already, who knows in what way depending on the disability

On top of that, since its baby organs you can't really stuff them in a grown person, so you'd have other babies that will be on treatment for life,

Meaning that with universal healthcare, you'd be paying for someone elses 5-20 years of life

2018-09-21 10:18:27 UTC  

cuz afaik, we haven't managed to give life-long resistance against organ rejection 🤔

You can give someone 5-20 years depending on the organ

2018-09-21 10:19:21 UTC  

besides, i'd love to have 4-5 clones with me, so i can become a roaming gang of Dr.Wols 😛

2018-09-21 10:22:16 UTC  

The answer to our concerns is something we're not funding properly

2018-09-21 10:22:24 UTC  

Dead baby due to lack of organ or 20 years of life? I do not see genetic deficiencies as a problem. Just coz you're still born doesn't mean you are a mutant. Babies are dying at the moment coz it's not a nice thing to ask parents that have just lost their child. 'Can we cut them up'

2018-09-21 10:22:26 UTC  

Fuckin' STEM CELLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLS

2018-09-21 10:22:30 UTC  

GET THEM HERE

2018-09-21 10:22:36 UTC  

WHAT ARE WE DOING

2018-09-21 10:23:02 UTC  

yes. Agreed, But others are. We will get there. This sovles a problem now.

2018-09-21 10:23:14 UTC  

but why settle for 20 years Poppy? When we can give them 80?

2018-09-21 10:23:25 UTC  

I'll give you 60.

2018-09-21 10:23:29 UTC  

65 tops.

2018-09-21 10:23:31 UTC  

Alright 66.

2018-09-21 10:23:38 UTC  

But not a year more

2018-09-21 10:23:46 UTC  

67 is my FINAL OFFER.

2018-09-21 10:23:51 UTC  

geez, my lifestyle isn't THAT detrimental 😛

2018-09-21 10:23:55 UTC  

Take it or leave it.

2018-09-21 10:24:08 UTC  

I wont settle for anything more than 55!

2018-09-21 10:24:23 UTC  

Alright ya twisted my arm. 68, but you're ROBBING me here.

2018-09-21 10:24:33 UTC  

It's not guaranteed that they will need another replacement. Whats the problem?

2018-09-21 10:24:52 UTC  

It is guaranteed, since atm organ rejection is inevitable

2018-09-21 10:25:04 UTC  

not in 20 it might not be.