Message from @Dr.Wol
Discord ID: 439335209557557248
The only reason that is fake news is because they use different names for their variables 😁
Racial Differences in Bone Strength https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1863580/
Already broke 100k
The only acceptable revision to the 1st Amendment would be to make the words "The 1st amendment should be repealed" (and variants on such words) illegal
If someone can come up with a justification for repealing the first amendment I think they should be able to say such things
I can come up with one: To replace it with one solidifying the freedoms enshrined within it to an even greater scale. Extend them to any and all institutions that at any point what so ever have recieved tax funding, as well as clarifying that it also applies to any and all public forums, be they physical or digital.
Heres a better one, make it sooo free people stop being able to filter anything and become like cartman in that tourette episode
Then they HAVE to be good in fear of blurting out their wrongdoing
Anyone who says that we need to put an end to the first amendment should just be told that their hypocrisy is adorable.
You don‘t want free speech? Practice what you preach and shut the fuck up.
Be the change.
Actually
I can see Revan's point.
By arresting someone for saying the first amendment should be repealed
You're basically giving them exactly what they ask for.
It's the best compromise.
Almost every time someone says "There should be a law against ${X}", they're probably wrong; and it usually re-enforces itself through some medium.
Almost every time someone says 'there should be a law against that' they're not serious.
damn u somiiiiiii! 😛
what people seem to forget is that most laws that actually stick for over 100 years, are generally ones that are good
and these people think they'll suddenly fix society by changing a law that worked... overnight and it'll all be honkey cuz they're enlightened
There should be a law against mass shootings. Guess what, didnt stop them from doing it anyway.
Laws a piece of paper, it only exists if you actually enforce it.
And some things are tricky to enforce.
Then why make a law then?
Hence why hate speech laws with subjective definitions are silly.
You can make a law but don’t expect it to actually stop everything. Even if it is enforced there will always be things that slip between the cracks. Just shows that laws and enforcement still aren’t enough to prevent some things.
Wait a second, why are we talking like we disagree.
That’s why we need good guys with guns to stop the bad ones that make it through the system.
We aren’t lol.
Well I wasn’t.
Noooo, I mean the pattern will look like it. Its like imagine two people with their faces 2 inches, like they gonna fight. But instead they keep yelling shit like, SOOOO WHATS FOR DINNER, YOU WANT BK?
Lol
Anyhow, I want to know the reasoning.
Like, a sign saying no noise means fuck all. Unless theres a librarian there to physically remove disruptous individuals.
Can’t post pics so this will have to do https://www.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/hr5zp/im_a_sign_not_a_cop/
If you're a cop you have to tell me
hello tim you ever on here?