Message from @(INSRT)Lawns
Discord ID: 438783047077462017
Though I think Squats, Ratlings, and Ologs do fight alongside humans. Though they are pretty much humans with some mutations of sorts.
Squats, Ratlings and Ogryns are so-called 'sanctioned abhumans' in 40k.
They are mutants, and as such second-class citizens, but the mutation is 'stable' and well understood, and there's both too many of them and they're too useful to just exterminate. That would be a waste of human lives, and lives are the Emperor's currency. And wasting the Emperor's currency is one of the gravest sins.
Isn't it great that you goys have to learn about the Holohox.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laws_requiring_teaching_of_the_Holocaust
I think its great the deniers wont shut up about it,
I mean what does it matter either way?
If the holocaust happend, well shucks, sucks for those who are 99% dead now, I didn't partake so i don't owe them anything but my WORDS of sympathies
If it didn't happen, well shucks, I didn't partake, so i don't owe them anything
nobody cares but those who say it didn't happen, and they don't have a good reason either
Not like educating people about the "horrors of Nazi fascism" has stopped the rise of socialist fascists in the west anyway, looking at you Antifa
Remember people, Nazis are socialist too.
So it's not different then not teaching people through number of people killed under communism
"The Jewgoisie stole the peoples fortune, lets take it from them and install our people in charge to keep things secured for us"
yeah, same people
I can't tell if the original comment ment Russia was Marx's country because it's the first one they knew to be communist? Or call themselves that, or just and idiot
She is an idiot.
The only reason that is fake news is because they use different names for their variables 😁
Racial Differences in Bone Strength https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1863580/
The only acceptable revision to the 1st Amendment would be to make the words "The 1st amendment should be repealed" (and variants on such words) illegal
If someone can come up with a justification for repealing the first amendment I think they should be able to say such things
I can come up with one: To replace it with one solidifying the freedoms enshrined within it to an even greater scale. Extend them to any and all institutions that at any point what so ever have recieved tax funding, as well as clarifying that it also applies to any and all public forums, be they physical or digital.
Heres a better one, make it sooo free people stop being able to filter anything and become like cartman in that tourette episode
Then they HAVE to be good in fear of blurting out their wrongdoing
Anyone who says that we need to put an end to the first amendment should just be told that their hypocrisy is adorable.
You don‘t want free speech? Practice what you preach and shut the fuck up.
Be the change.
Actually
I can see Revan's point.
By arresting someone for saying the first amendment should be repealed
You're basically giving them exactly what they ask for.
It's the best compromise.
Almost every time someone says "There should be a law against ${X}", they're probably wrong; and it usually re-enforces itself through some medium.
Almost every time someone says 'there should be a law against that' they're not serious.
there should be a law against suggesting violence in name of a religion
damn u somiiiiiii! 😛
what people seem to forget is that most laws that actually stick for over 100 years, are generally ones that are good
and these people think they'll suddenly fix society by changing a law that worked... overnight and it'll all be honkey cuz they're enlightened
There should be a law against mass shootings. Guess what, didnt stop them from doing it anyway.