Message from @CreativeRealms
Discord ID: 439757115767390248
Almost every time someone says "There should be a law against ${X}", they're probably wrong; and it usually re-enforces itself through some medium.
Almost every time someone says 'there should be a law against that' they're not serious.
there should be a law against suggesting violence in name of a religion
damn u somiiiiiii! 😛
what people seem to forget is that most laws that actually stick for over 100 years, are generally ones that are good
and these people think they'll suddenly fix society by changing a law that worked... overnight and it'll all be honkey cuz they're enlightened
There should be a law against mass shootings. Guess what, didnt stop them from doing it anyway.
Laws a piece of paper, it only exists if you actually enforce it.
And some things are tricky to enforce.
Then why make a law then?
Hence why hate speech laws with subjective definitions are silly.
You can make a law but don’t expect it to actually stop everything. Even if it is enforced there will always be things that slip between the cracks. Just shows that laws and enforcement still aren’t enough to prevent some things.
Wait a second, why are we talking like we disagree.
That’s why we need good guys with guns to stop the bad ones that make it through the system.
We aren’t lol.
Well I wasn’t.
Noooo, I mean the pattern will look like it. Its like imagine two people with their faces 2 inches, like they gonna fight. But instead they keep yelling shit like, SOOOO WHATS FOR DINNER, YOU WANT BK?
Lol
Anyhow, I want to know the reasoning.
Like, a sign saying no noise means fuck all. Unless theres a librarian there to physically remove disruptous individuals.
Can’t post pics so this will have to do https://www.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/hr5zp/im_a_sign_not_a_cop/
If you're a cop you have to tell me
hello tim you ever on here?
@BanksyStyle Tim pops in occasionally to get reads on his fans. Once or twice, he's used us to crowdsource. It's definitely not a direct channel to him here, though.
CNN sensationalizing again
so, i have a pixel 2. googles phone. I see this in my news feed: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2018/05/01/pro-second-amendment-students-plan-school-walkouts/571445002/
So i click copy link. And i get this: https://www.tallahassee.com/story/news/2018/05/01/pro-second-amendment-student-walkouts-planned-wednesday-stand-second/569121002/
So then i do a quick google search in chrome, and get this link: https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.usatoday.com/amp/571445002
which clearly has usa today in its name. links to the usa today story on my phone. but on my computer linkes to the Tallahassee democrat.
@Timcast stuff is strange.
Tina Nguyen for Vanity Fair labeled a bunch of people as "far right" in orginal article http://archive.is/X9XAp#selection-849.79-881.86
>The trend toward conservative influencers has also given a boost to Prager University, a massive media platform that pumps out slickly produced explainer-type videos by far-right firebrands like former Google engineer James Damore, pro-Trump sheriff David Clarke, publishing exec Steve Forbes, New York Times columnist Bret Stephens, and National Review editor Jonah Goldberg, all of which somehow manage to coexist. According to Buzzfeed, PragerU, as it’s known, is on track to hit a billion page views in 2018.
https://twitter.com/MaajidNawaz/status/991603592665612288 complaint on twitter by ??? some blue checkmark
Senior writer at Commentary and WSJ jumps on it too: https://twitter.com/SohrabAhmari/status/991607268780146688
Author responds to this https://twitter.com/tina_nguyen/status/991666540469784576
Ben Shapiro Piece about it: https://www.dailywire.com/news/30151/vanity-fair-columnist-kanye-was-seduced-far-right-ben-shapiro
Dave Rubin virtue signalling with all his might: https://twitter.com/RubinReport/status/991703591923613698
New language: https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2018/05/how-kanye-west-was-red-pilled-by-the-far-right
>The trend toward conservative influencers has also given a boost to Prager University, a massive media platform that pumps out slickly produced explainer-type videos by firebrands like former Google engineer James Damore, pro-Trump sheriff David Clarke, publishing exec Steve Forbes, New York Times columnist Bret Stephens, and National Review editor Jonah Goldberg, all of which somehow manage to coexist. According to Buzzfeed, PragerU, as it’s known, is on track to hit a billion page views in 2018.
"Abject drivel from Vanity Fair"
abject drivel. Dave channeling his inner Shapiro?
I used to like Dave, but he's really let himself go
his interviews feel more like gay porn with all the guest dicks he's sucking, and he virtue signals constantly on twitter
oh it didn't happen. only Candace Owens went on. Whew
@itsnotmyfault I... AgReE... wItH tHaT....
I just watched this talk about the origin of fake news. Has anyone else seen this and have thoughts on it?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oa7QvcKYGZA
Above Video Source: Hillsdale Collage.
shame shame @ kanye, I think the one world order could have been taken down in a single interview
This is why we need to keep the communists out. http://www.returnofkings.com/172805/land-is-a-source-of-liberty-and-masculinity?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+ReturnOfKings+%28Return+Of+Kings%29
I know you lads don't think authoritarian rule is a good idea at this point but it's already happening with the goverment spying on you and the like. So the is do you want someone who will save the west or slow the decline?