considering the weapons that were being revealed in the 50's and 60's that had been created in the 30's and 40's by trials of the CIA, the CIA has the greater potential to be more dangerous than the KGB ever was

Why I acknowledged it and stated "greater potential to be more dangerous than"\

One thing I would like to comment on, most Anarchists aren't anarchists but douchebag socialists that vote towards a stronger central government and more government handouts, most Anarchists are an oxymoron.

For most of the outspoken ones that protest in major cities are some of the same members of Antifa and a handful of BLM

which are heavily socialist organizations

I'm referring to majority of self identified anarchists in the US

Anarachists to have an organization is an oxymoron, haha

or a "typical" hierarchy model

the term "anarchy" literally means "no leader".

Anarchy, in its essence and presented by the word itself, with its Latin root means "no leader". That would mean that everybody would have to operate on social contract because their is no enforcer or central authority/leader

Anything other than that would be properly coined as "pseudoanarchism"

Then how will any public roads or infrastructure be completed if there are no tax dollars?

Anarchy and Dictatorship are so far on the ends of the spectrum that they loop back into each other, in anarchy, a leader will arise (more like druglord or kingpin, think the likes of Pablo Escabar) that controls the local area and everyone will be at the will of the kingpin

There will be a constant lord of the flies scenario until somebody is able to maintain power and then they die and it goes back to the LotF situation or their heir will maintain rule, there is always Order or Chaos, there is no true quantum existence of Unified versus Divided rule

Ukraine can't handle a nuclear reactor, let alone a successful government, what works for Ukraine doesn't work for the U.S.

Ukraine is still under political control of Russia, they just aren't annexed

Eagle, I never stated what your position was

Okay, however, I never assumed what your political ideology was

Seems a little defensive of a response

Again, "Way to assume something that is 100% not my position" and then making an assumption of, "Just stating you all have a very diluted idea of what the ideology really is and the shades of it" (arguably a logical fallacy of ad hominem attack and possibly implied "mah authoriteh" fallacy) and that we have diluted views of what anarchy is, did you ever ask me what I knew about anarchy? I was speaking about the Latin origin and definition of the word "anarchy" and how it is inconsistent with a lot of anarchist ideologies, something that was refuted by what you said, Eagle Eye, it appears to me that you are reading into a phenomenal amount of my speech searching for inferences/implications that simply aren't there.

"It is better to remain silent at the risk of being thought a fool, than to talk and remove all doubt of it." -"Maurice Switzer

Again, I'm going to interrupt you, I said "It wouldn't work for the U.S." that doesn't mean that I believe that you believe it will work

Is this Political Simulator for NA and the AngloSaxon world? U.S. is part of it, is it not?

I was going to say, for the sim, 360 million Americans is a majority of the population for the Anglo-Saxon world, lol

And 325.7 million only counts for legal citizens >.> <.< >.>

And an immigrant fresh over the border isn't a permanent resident legally

unless they make, shall I be the one to say it, anchor babies and then use the DREAM act as a free pass to a life of luxury and government handouts

Catholics, as in referring to the ideology, are not Aristotelicians by any stretch of the imagination, Galileo's head rolled because the one and only Aristotelician ideal that the Catholic Church supported (all others were rejected) was the geocentric model and Galileo threatened that. The Church as a whole didn't apologize for doing this until 1996.

They are heavily reliant on dogma, not Aristotelician ideals.

@Deleted User

Thomism led to the strengthening and rebranding of the Catholic church and Calvinism led to the strengthening and defining of the Protestant movement. A passage from Aquineas, "We do not perceive by an immediate intuition that God exists, nor do we prove it a priori. But we do prove it a posteriori, i.e., from the things that have been created, following an argument from the effects to the cause" paraphrased down to, "God exists because nothing here would be here without God." That is dogmatic

"Empirical analysis of god and his creations", not the empirical analysis of EVERYTHING but just assuming that God created everything, Aristotle was the student of Plato whom in turn was the student of Socrates and they came to the general consensus that everything must be questioned and that there is nothing to be taken for granted.

What I'm stating is though he views religion with an analytical view point, Aristotle questioned everything and made no incorruptible premise

Which difffers from Aristotle, whom sought "truth", not "belief"

He wouldn't have lived to the age he did if he asked, "How do we know God exists?", he pushed the ideology of "Can't disprove it, so why not God exist?" to push the beliefs of the Catholic church

He applies what benefitted the church to it but rejected everything else that didn't.

aluminum

rise up lights

traveling

travelling

crayon

Supercalifragilisticespialidocious

Peter picked a peck of pickled peppers

How much would could a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood? A woodchuck could chuck, would chuck wood if a woodchuck could wood.

pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis

Longest English word ^^^

01100110 01110101 01100011 01101011 01111001 01101111 01110101 01110010 01110000 01110010 01100101 01110100 01100101 01101110 01110100 01101001 01101111 01110101 01110011 01100010 01110101 01101100 01101100 01110011 01101000 01101001 01110100

American- fuck the "e" in grey, the "u" in colour, the second "l" in "travelling" and the "i" in "aluminium", MURIKA 🇺🇲

Capitalism is forced altruism. It is organized chaops. You want something? Give me something for it for your mutual survival. It forces us to be productive in order to survive, it is economic Darwinism, thrive or die

Capitalism is Darwinist, for all businesses, they either thrive or they fail. 99% of all businesses fail within the first 5 years of starting up. Where is the Studebaker company today, @Meta ?

Government involvement is not capitalism, that is mixed market economy

@🌼Kalina🌹🌸🌹Zay🌹🌸🌹Scott🌼 Are you familiar with the term "laissez-faire"?

What? Laissez-faire means "hands off", that's a predicate or state of being, not a noun.

Who is "THEY"?

Here is the definition of capitalism, "an economic and political system in which a country's trade and industry are controlled by private owners for profit, rather than by the state." Where does this involve using the state to control the economy?

"controlled by private owners for profit, rather than by the state." If it does not meet this definition, it is not capitalism. The use of lobbyists and using bureacracy to bash novice businesses is a tool of corporatism and bureacracy, by creating government regulations, that kills small businesses, not free choice of the people.

Self interest doesn't immediately devolve into greed. Self interest is the better of self, greed is the destruction of others and lack of ethics in order to gain for one self.

@🌼Kalina🌹🌸🌹Zay🌹🌸🌹Scott🌼 A few bad apples don't ruin the bunch. Was it not the efforts of Carnegie, JP Morgan, Vanderbuilt and other wealthy individuals that led to the development of the west and the advancement of the Industrial Revolution in America?

You've never heard of Southern Bell, have you?

Karde, you don't know what Southern Bell is, apparently. You couldn't make a call in the United States between 1960 to 1984 without paying a fee to Ma Bell.

It took over 80 years to break the Bell Industry and it controlled the entire United States and much larger markets across ALL of North America, including the United States, Bahamas, Tahiti, Mexico, Canada, Jamaica, owned 54% of the Japanese telecommunications market. It made the monopolies of Union Steel and Standard Oil look like Park Street properties on the Monopoly board. Want to know what resulted of the broken up Bell company? Localized municipality monopolies such as Broadband, Mediacom, Cox, AT&T, Comcast, etc., doing absolutely nothing to improve the situation for the phone/ISP consumers, Title II of the Telecommunications Act of 1994 was to allow the FCC to set ethical business regulations on tiered Internet instead of equal access, the government fucked it up with the latest "net neutrality" decision, free speech on the internet was protected by the revision of Article V of the Telecommunications Act of 1994 in around 2005. It had to do with the corrupted practice of stagflating cable and IS prices for consumers that were made with a mark up of 1000-10,000%, no other start up company can contest with these companies because of municipality regulations and bureacracy.

20 million Russians died under the rule of Stalin, justify this.

Stalin murdered Trotsky, justify.\

It's going to grow if it owns nearly half of the world, largest empire in history after the British empire at its height

I am declaring my independent candidacy for president of GSA, I am not declaring a party for my candidacy, I am running with the platform towards a democratic republic and to encourage the development of the sciences and arts and the betterment of humanity and the world as a whole. I press for that instead of being a globalized state, we instead return to the nations of the UK, Australia, Canada and the United States with our localized governments that will best work towards the benefit of our people.

I am declaring my independent candidacy for president of GSA, I am not declaring a party for my candidacy, I am running with the platform towards a democratic republic and to encourage the development of the sciences and arts and the betterment of humanity and the world as a whole. I press for that instead of being a globalized state, we instead return to the nations of the UK, Australia, Canada and the United States with our localized governments that will best work towards the benefit of our people.

Parties are labels and self-made divisions that will only divide us as a people, we must stand together as humans and not divide ourselves into a ME vs THEM, but as US and US ALL TOGETHER.

Parties will exist but are unnecessary, the first election of the nation of the United States was unanimous with the election of Washington as president. If there shall be political gridlock, nothing shall be achieved in our democracy. We must be cohesive enough in order to be able to push for the common good of our nation.

Compromise: The Fascists can rant about the jews as much as they like (free speech) yet they will act in respect to the natural rights of man and shall not kill others.

Compromise is the only method that anything shall be achieved, a house divided SHALL NOT STAND.

We are endowed by our creator with certain inalienable rights that among these are life, liberty and pursuit of happiness. Upon the rights of one not infringing upon another, true liberty and equality shall be achieved.

No. I stand against that, you shall be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law and judged by a jury of your peers.

@here IS there no rules against use of racial slurs?

This guy is a troll, right?

The absence of eviedence isn't the evidence of absence, I'm sheerly dumbfounded by the extreme disregard towards the preciousness of human life as a gift and the extreme prejudice towards a people that have contributed greatly to the advancement of humanity from the very beginning and are still existing today.

Palestine never belonged to the Arabs to begin with. The province of Judeah was renamed to "Philistine" as a punishment after the Third Jewish rebellion against Rome, "Palestinian" is a label assumed Arabs from the remainder of the Arabic sulphates that were broken apart with the fall of the Ottoman Empire.

@Deleted User Which is around 600-800 AD, Israeli Jews occupied that area since BC.

The kingdoms of Judeah and Israel, what were those?

Okay, here's a compromise, we designate Australia as a WASP ethnostate and the British Isles as a communist nation and allow them to "thrive" in a biome similar to that of the "great USSR" and allow those that want to chase the American Dream to inhabit the United States. If parties want such conditions in which they are the superior party, let them be geographically isolated from the rest of the world that wants freedom.

@Deleted User Did I ever justify slaughter anywhere? And for reference,

Palenstinians aren't innocent either, refer to the Munich Massacre.

What you describe Karde is hedonistic and ridiculous wealth, the American Dream was defined by as home ownership and being able to retire comfortably without worries of financial security in their golden years.

@🌼Kalina🌹🌸🌹Zay🌹🌸🌹Scott🌼 So we steal from the rich and redistribute their money?

@🌼Kalina🌹🌸🌹Zay🌹🌸🌹Scott🌼 You are forcing people at gunpoint to turn over their property and this is less as corrupt system that already exists? Who will manage said funds?

How could Sargon of the Akkad have read it? He was was an Akkadian figure of legend

@notjojo Please present a unique idea or statement or stop typing, please.

There are homeless shelters in every single state and city of the United States, three hot meals and a bed to sleep in, anything not covered by the welfare system is covered by the churches and private organizations, the United States is the best place to be homeless if one happens to be.

@🌼Kalina🌹🌸🌹Zay🌹🌸🌹Scott🌼 They are a socialist state with only a few million people, the socialist/communist model doesn't work for a populationf of 200+ million

300*

@🌼Kalina🌹🌸🌹Zay🌹🌸🌹Scott🌼 I'm going to debunk your fallacy right now, A black man robs a store, are all black men criminals?

@🌼Kalina🌹🌸🌹Zay🌹🌸🌹Scott🌼 There are a minority of black men that rob stores, so therefore, does that make them all criminals?

A minority of Norway is capitalist, does that make them all capitalist?

Socialism isn''t great, communism isn't great, fascism isn't great, imperialism isn't great and democracy sucks but it is always getting better.

All things created by man are inherently flawed, we all are imperfect, however, it is the drive to correct such wrongs by doing the right thing that allow for us to improve and to advance. We can't have rights for all if we infringe on the rights of the few, regardless of how immoral we feel they are, their rights are equal to all others.

Has Bill Gates ever threatened people with guns to do what he says?

How?

Ad hominem attack, fyi, @🌼Kalina🌹🌸🌹Zay🌹🌸🌹Scott🌼 , it is a very large logical fallacy, calling names does nothing to strengthen the point.

You want me to quote Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels? (something that has been failed to be addressed, the Communist Manifesto wasn't solely authored by Marx.) Let me quote, "The bourgeoisie cannot exist without constantly revolutionising the instruments of production" So, the methods of production shall never be improved?

It was the NAtional Socialist Worker's Party

@here I invite the communists and fascists to debate in general, I see all of this cowardly and immoral slur dropping and ad hominem attacks being made yet no solutions are being proposed. If there is truly a desire to better the wellbeing of our nation then allow it to be spoken man to man instead of cowardishly behind mountains of text.

Tianammen Square and ruthless censorship, to achieve socialism, the sacrifice of all liberties and rights is worth to achieve this economic system?

Do they not have the rights to life? YES or NO?

Again, do the lives of those in Tian Square matter or NOT? YES or NO?