Yeeeeep

Ukraine can't handle a nuclear reactor, let alone a successful government, what works for Ukraine doesn't work for the U.S.

@LoJ ukraine did the most retarded thing, and thats sell about 5000 nuclear shit to russia

The rogue miltias that wave the blood and soil flag of anarchy don't take orders from the Ukrainian state, the Russian separatists or even some high up in the militia. They fight in small bands thats only leadership comes from just respected individuals. They are a brotherhood. They are part of a larger movement and ideal, but they aren't organized as as movement, only united behind a common culture.

Ukraine is still under political control of Russia, they just aren't annexed

Ukraine is a great place to gain combat experience

Omfg Jabbers. NICE. Way to assume something that is 100% not my position

AAAAA LEAGUE OF JABBERS

DAS JUDEN

@NoProfit you can come to bosnia aswell, there's a riot happening in sarajevo, its capital

I am one of those people that recognizes that there is NO ideal political system for the entire world. Different cultures and people will be compatible with different systems.

Unless you change the culture.

As according to Karde you can do that.

._.

**Discuss**

I did the test

It's really bad

I got An-Cap

I never advocated that for the U.S., I don't even support it 100% for Ukraine, given that centralized states surrounding them can prevent it from existing

ANCAP

Eagle, I never stated what your position was

I am a Constitutionalist in the U.S.

isn't national socialism a ideal political system? i mean for one they destroy all other political parties to their people wouldnt fight one another over politics, secondly it rejects democracy, which goes against human nature, and thirdly natsoc goes all for natural way of things @🦅 𝓔𝓪𝓰𝓵𝓮 𝓔𝔂𝓮 🦅

Okay, however, I never assumed what your political ideology was

No TubeYou

Seems a little defensive of a response

People debating me like I am an anarchist

Just stating you all have a very diluted idea of what the ideology really is and the shades of it

@🦅 𝓔𝓪𝓰𝓵𝓮 𝓔𝔂𝓮 🦅 so, no what

"wouldn't fight each other over politics"

lmfao

there was fighting for the system to be installed in the first place

Human nature is a complex thing and people assume they can understand it to a T

It depends heavily on the kind of culture you are raised in

people in free nations have a natural drive to be ruled

people in authoritarian nations have a natural drive to be free

also have to account for religion

which can really mix things up a ton

Again, "Way to assume something that is 100% not my position" and then making an assumption of, "Just stating you all have a very diluted idea of what the ideology really is and the shades of it" (arguably a logical fallacy of ad hominem attack and possibly implied "mah authoriteh" fallacy) and that we have diluted views of what anarchy is, did you ever ask me what I knew about anarchy? I was speaking about the Latin origin and definition of the word "anarchy" and how it is inconsistent with a lot of anarchist ideologies, something that was refuted by what you said, Eagle Eye, it appears to me that you are reading into a phenomenal amount of my speech searching for inferences/implications that simply aren't there.

"It is better to remain silent at the risk of being thought a fool, than to talk and remove all doubt of it." -"Maurice Switzer

@🦅 𝓔𝓪𝓰𝓵𝓮 𝓔𝔂𝓮 🦅 yeah but after hitler removed all other political parties, people stopped fighting one another over politics

I was talking about Ukraine