now ya get it 😇

,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FK1zPvhpyYc

i wonder how tim would feel if a white person played a black character

I don't think it matters as long as the character looks the same

Or is really well done

hmm pro blackface

interesting position

I personally liked domino in Deadpool 2 as well

And the kingpin on daredevil the movie

But there's limits of course

those are all blackefied white characters

Yes

i mean a white person acting out a black character

How long ago was tropic thunder released lmao

I posted that as an example of the Inverse. If you want a white person playing a black character, annihilation did that pretty well

also

Argo is another great example

no one grows up with a black father Tim, inplying they do is cultural imperialism

Oh, and Drive

Drive was fucking awesome

Irene was originally Latin American

YES

Wait “Drive” the movie ? The female char was originally latin ? I could def see that no white women is dumb enough to date that thug dude but ....it has happened before

I love seeing them eat their own

Well jess phillips, you asked for it, you got it

Wahmxn

🤔

I love this show so much https://youtu.be/nq-dchJPXGA

I know this is a year old video, but...

so we'll be People and Wamxn

I thought it would be Womnx

Like Latinx

Breaking News! ***WHITE SUPREMACIST TIM POOL STALKS FELLOW JOURNALIST WITH ASSAULT RIFLE***

Lol

assault beanie

And now the image of Tim rapidly choking people to death with his beanie is stuck in my head

Is it gay to ship Luke and Tim?

yes

Tim doesnt peddle in conspiracies

I can see Tim being the new Big Boss.

But instead of a knife, the assault beanie is his weapon.

https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/10/10/russia-is-4chan-china-is-facebook/

this feature is gonna have hilarious consequences.

🤔

Its only an assault beanie if:
- It has full-elasticity
- an intermediate color
- logos be supplied on one side
- have an effective range of atleast 300 meters

***Count Dankula*** *viewers watch this*
**BLACK PEOPLE HAVE LOW IQ ETHNOSTATE NOW**

lol wuts that

***THE ILLUMINATI IS RISING***

***IT IS REAL!***

Tim Pool viewers watch this
THE HOTTEST ANIME TRAPS OF 2018

Beyond the partisan issues, though, there’s a deeper danger in equating Russia and China. Think of it in these terms: Russia is 4chan, and China is Facebook. If you’re not familiar with 4chan, imagine the worst losers you knew in high school—not the nice, dopey stoners, but the rat-faced scumbags trying to take upskirt pictures—and then imagine them encouraging each other to be even worse people online. Like 4chan, Russia is all about chaos, mixed with a hearty dose of anti-Semitism and homophobia.

Rat faced scumbags !!

Heeey. Tim can't be a trap. All evidence points to him being a dude. Unless you mean reverse trap, but that still can't be right.

Seems they misspelled weaponised autists @zutt

God, if I'm forced to write one more thing about microaggressions for this class I'm going to projectile vomit.

Well the article is thrashy otherwise

Lel

Lol the textbooks here may have a hard on for Marx but atleast we don't have to write about micro agressions

It's a class that fills the diversity requirement that the campus has.

why not say that making homework is a microaggression 😛

and then zoidberg out of the room

https://media.giphy.com/media/SNK21X1PBrtQs/giphy.gif

see if I really wanted to, I'd say that making me sit down and read that much material is really harsh on students with ADHD, I could argue it.
But I don't have the willpower to spout that much bull in one sitting.

Wow that sentence really didn't hold well. I'm tired.

their, they're..

It's going to be okay 😛

have a beanie emote

<:beanie:463084349642899468>

Stop. I'm too tired to have an aneurysm.

😛

Btw this is very interesting op piece in guardian

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/oct/11/war-jedi-algorithmic-warfare-us-military

I will have to read that not-right-now. Right now I try to get 2-3 hours of sleep before I get ready for class.

go sleep now then 😛

have a good night/day/whatever

good night

The problem isn’t the quality of the tools, in other words, but the institution wielding them. And AI will only make that institution more brutal. The forever war demands that the US sees enemies everywhere. AI promises to find those enemies faster – even if all it takes to be considered an enemy is exhibiting a pattern of behavior that a (classified) machine-learning model associates with hostile activity. Call it death by big data.

neat https://twitter.com/BBCTech/status/1050347396390166529?s=20

it is a ridiculous article

>death by big data

😄

who fancies a new plane?

AI will not cause "forever wars" it will cause an end to wars

and you'll end up with either 1 ruler faction that can't be stopped because their AI will be unbeatable.

Or you'll end up with a Skynet that will be able to take over cuz it can beat human capabilities

Thats endgame tho

Atm he is right

Us is waging forever war

theres only 2 steps in the AI for warfare plan

"creating one"
"winning"

Uh oh....

I think the one thing we should be training AI for is judging legal cases

looks like "the left" is taking on the "internet bill of rights"

for or against

Against obviously

saying "we should have an internet bill of rights" and then going on to explain how it should lay down "individual responsibilities"

cos thats what you want in a bill of "rights" .. a list of responsibilities

so first they create a problem (mass censorship) and then they vie for legislation on a problem they created

https://techcrunch.com/2018/10/11/the-internet-bill-of-rights-is-just-one-piece-of-our-moral-obligations/

the word "moral" already makes me reject whatever this article will propose 😛

I can tell when someone says "moral" they actually mean censor everyone they don't like in the name of fighting hate speech.

I'm sure this version would advocate for more censorship.

well its simple

Anyone making an appeal to "morals" has no RATIONAL argument,

And since my morals aren't the same as theirs, i can't have faith their morals are beneficial to me

How do you feel about the use of the word Ethical?

The question is

Whose morals do they mean ?

In Pakistan its moral to put the atheist bloger to the sword

😔

And i wish i was joking about that

in all muslim countries its moral to throw gay people off roofs 😉

Ethics are the same issue as morals,

Your ethics don't match up to mine

a bill of rights should be simple... just a list of individuals' rights... no extra "but the state can do this" or "but heres some responsibilities" etc etc...

:shirt: Check out **Tim Pool's TeeSpring Merch**:
<https://teespring.com/stores/timcast>

:dollar: Support **Tim Pool** on Patreon (exclusive rewards available):
<https://www.patreon.com/timcast>

internet constitution

like the ECHR... so much extra BS... as apposed to the UN universal human rights declaration

Me when a liberal talks about morals and ethics: I do not think it means what you think it means.

nah they know what it means

point is that they're talking about "THEIR" morals and ethics

not yours, or general ones

seems to me like modern liberals lost the "theory of mind"

Wow cnn fucking racist as fuck

They said the n word uncensored and they lol’d

The alt right must be happy about this

Well, they follow the "free speech for me but not for thee" rule.

Tru tru ^

negro is not the "n-word" its just the technical term .. as apposed to caucasoid

https://youtu.be/Kgg3ZOlDb70

So CNN can be rascist as fuck whenever they want and they won't get called out for it, while they'll happily call out anyone else who is.

It's all kinds of fucked up.

@wacka thats bullshit bro the f word and n word can be any word that begins with that letter REeeeeeeeeee

y'all so upset with the word nigger

@Braydon its fucker up when cnn doxes people that make fun of them

also i saw the fox news coverage of that... they edited out the point that it was a chris rock reference which they clarified straight away

I didnt see that one @wacka

@Abel lmao

theyre concentrating on the wrong thing... they made fun of him because of his mental illness

everyone can agree thats wrong

And I just read this article about how they must've blackmailed a reddit user who made a Trump meme.

the CNN wrestling tackle?

yeah

if they concentrate on the fact they said negro... theyre going to lose

they "hold the right to reveal his name"

I hated CNN before, I despise CNN now.

I dont think i ever liked cnn my grandma used to watch it when she babysat me

because most on the right.. firstly, its not "the n-word" secondly... most of the right are pro free speech

Then when i grew up i was like cnn i dont need that shit

@wacka agree

50%

CNN stopped having a use when they stopped reporting incidents, and became "expert opinion" pundits on Tweets

CNN should split their service to CNN news and CNN opinion

@Dr.Wol it sucks but this is the evolution of “news” now

at very least they can see then which one gets more ratings

CNN news would become a net-loss

They can't report faster than twitter viral incidents

Im so glad we have access to more shit now because of the intertubes

"News" evolved to becoming everyone with a twitter and a phone

whats left as "mainstream media news" is just refuse of has-beens, and toxic partisanship

you know, it is what it is

it would be interesting if they brought out a new law/rule... where if someone describes themselves in a certain way (like "factual news") they are held to extreme standards where not even opinion pieces are allowed .. I wonder how many would actually subscribe to that description

would still be fake

you'd get lying by omission instead

so you still have freedom of press... but if you want that "presteigious" label you have to have extreme standards and massive repercussions for misleading

well, with that you'd have the tale of 2 narratives

Left thinks CNN is telling the truth and Fox is misleading
Right thinks Fox is telling the truth and CNN is misleading

@Dr.Wol i mentioned this before but i worked at nbc and they actually pulled me into a meeting with them and they asked me what is twitter and shot like that , i was just a IT consultant

so cnn/fox/msnbc would all have to split to 2 companies ... with one having the new title

it would have to stick completely to facts

"so and so said this", "so and so replied with this"

who decides what facts are?

This was in 2009 and fox was beating nbc

nobody can decide what facts are

then you can't have a consensus on which news is "prestigeous"

Facts fuck that , we need shit that promotes our side , thats what is happenig now

if you say "Trump infuriates people by saying 'blah blah blah'" ... then you get repercusions if you cant prove that a significant amount of people are infuriated

I'd like a michelin star style organisation for news websites

Where they rate news websites

basically anyone can call them out .. and they have to prove what they say

Oh hey. I'm a normie now!

Look at the Kavanaugh case Wacka,

the Left believes Ford is telling the truth, and that Kava is lying and scum
the Right believes Ford is lying and scum, and Kava is telling the truth

you can't call either side out cuz theres no proof left or right

and they cant prove "after the fact" ... they would have to prove that they asked people BEFORE writing the story

at best you can say "theres no evidence, so the accusation can't be proven, Kava goes free"

@Abel ok elon musk https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1000080833678528512?s=20

I think the knife, back in the day, did a good job of taking out all the spin

just list the facts... hell put the whole transcript in the article

with a summary of quotes at the top

@Dr.Wol i sorta believed ford but after the fbi investigation, i 💯 % do not believe her now

Good song https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SePH50rdg-g

I never believed her, it was too convenient in timing, and the accusation follows the MeToo template
"Oh, something unprovable happened 36 years ago"

Too much shady shit going on with her , and that whole listen and believe bullshit is a shitty excuse for subverting due process

exactly, but my point was waht does the media say

and who can say "who is right"

if you can't have a consensus

Its like when people say “the customer is always right” fuck of with that shit , its a shitty excuse for shitty behavior

actually "the customer is always right" started on the store side to keep customers happy

And a excuse to fire csr

csr?

Customer service reps

nah those were there to ensure customers would stay happy and remain customers

Yeah cuz muh shekels

well yes

And brand loyalty

mostly just customers, brand loyalty is a bonus

Its shitty but yes thats how businesses work

its how market capitalism works

Money > People

If having more customers is good, sell out with "customer is always right" shtick
If having Customer service is good, expand the PR department

If having brand loyalty is good, make customers feel appreciated and wanted by giving them a free bag with a purchase

or a soda

If having only machines, and not 600 factory workers is good, upgrade to machines
If having cheap labor is good, move to china and put children to work

Exactly companies have been doing this for years

well it works 😛

problem is, that corrupting politics so you can change the rules into your favor is also good for money

https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1030033/Cambridge-university-poppy-remembrance-Sunday-student-union

Oh no no no no no

I just found this, and it's actually not that bad https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9o0c0aItpKo

They even do the solo and everything

That was good ^

I really liked the singer

Im not into that type of music , but i liked that

that sweet sweet multiculturalism

Multiculturalracism?

so lets do some math

"30 percent of Progressive
Activists believe political correctness is a problem. "

progressive activists are 8%

this means that sjws are like 5%

of the activists yeh

isnt it 2.4%

no, 30% think its a PROBLEM

so the remaining 70% think political correctness like now is okay (so the SJW's)

and then Tim made it an integer

but not thinking PC is a problem doesnt make someone a warrior of justice

they might just not care about it

like if 80% of people dont think white supremacists are a problem... doesnt mean they support or even endorse white supremacy

we're talking activists

not general people

thats a good point tho

still

sjws might be even less

among activists, many more tend to be armchair generals online

i wonder if theres a historical number on that... like how many were super SJWy in the 80's

maybe its always been the same

Every SJW activist is on Twitter and tubmlr

probably even more in the 60's/70's

So all we have to do is devise a program to parse the profiles of these people and we can get an exact count. What should the program look for? Weird colored hair I think is a must.

when its was like... culturally the thing in schools/coleges

usage of buzzwords

verified tickmark

open hatred and bigotry of certain races...

also i think its bigger now

Simply due to: The population having grown relative to the 70's
Economic downpour has turned people activist our of desperation/resentment

and social media connecting people

Despite the economy being better now than it was 3 years ago...

Those gender studies degrees are really working out for them

you always have SJW-like people in society, but if its 1 amongst 100 they'll be quiet and not spout their madness and learn that they're wrong

But if they connect with others, they can form bubbles that sustain their blindness due to "See, others see it too i'm not crazy"