Message from @wacka
Discord ID: 499918366044192808
And I just read this article about how they must've blackmailed a reddit user who made a Trump meme.
the CNN wrestling tackle?
yeah
if they concentrate on the fact they said negro... theyre going to lose
they "hold the right to reveal his name"
I hated CNN before, I despise CNN now.
I dont think i ever liked cnn my grandma used to watch it when she babysat me
because most on the right.. firstly, its not "the n-word" secondly... most of the right are pro free speech
Then when i grew up i was like cnn i dont need that shit
@wacka agree
50%
CNN stopped having a use when they stopped reporting incidents, and became "expert opinion" pundits on Tweets
CNN should split their service to CNN news and CNN opinion
@Dr.Wol it sucks but this is the evolution of “news” now
at very least they can see then which one gets more ratings
CNN news would become a net-loss
They can't report faster than twitter viral incidents
Im so glad we have access to more shit now because of the intertubes
"News" evolved to becoming everyone with a twitter and a phone
whats left as "mainstream media news" is just refuse of has-beens, and toxic partisanship
you know, it is what it is
it would be interesting if they brought out a new law/rule... where if someone describes themselves in a certain way (like "factual news") they are held to extreme standards where not even opinion pieces are allowed .. I wonder how many would actually subscribe to that description
would still be fake
you'd get lying by omission instead
so you still have freedom of press... but if you want that "presteigious" label you have to have extreme standards and massive repercussions for misleading
well, with that you'd have the tale of 2 narratives
Left thinks CNN is telling the truth and Fox is misleading
Right thinks Fox is telling the truth and CNN is misleading
@Dr.Wol i mentioned this before but i worked at nbc and they actually pulled me into a meeting with them and they asked me what is twitter and shot like that , i was just a IT consultant
so cnn/fox/msnbc would all have to split to 2 companies ... with one having the new title
it would have to stick completely to facts
"so and so said this", "so and so replied with this"
who decides what facts are?
This was in 2009 and fox was beating nbc
nobody can decide what facts are
then you can't have a consensus on which news is "prestigeous"
Facts fuck that , we need shit that promotes our side , thats what is happenig now
if you say "Trump infuriates people by saying 'blah blah blah'" ... then you get repercusions if you cant prove that a significant amount of people are infuriated
I'd like a michelin star style organisation for news websites
Where they rate news websites
basically anyone can call them out .. and they have to prove what they say
Oh hey. I'm a normie now!
Look at the Kavanaugh case Wacka,
the Left believes Ford is telling the truth, and that Kava is lying and scum
the Right believes Ford is lying and scum, and Kava is telling the truth
you can't call either side out cuz theres no proof left or right
and they cant prove "after the fact" ... they would have to prove that they asked people BEFORE writing the story