Message from @Dr.Wol
Discord ID: 499910612034256896
God, if I'm forced to write one more thing about microaggressions for this class I'm going to projectile vomit.
Well the article is thrashy otherwise
Lel
Lol the textbooks here may have a hard on for Marx but atleast we don't have to write about micro agressions
It's a class that fills the diversity requirement that the campus has.
why not say that making homework is a microaggression π
and then zoidberg out of the room
see if I really wanted to, I'd say that making me sit down and read that much material is really harsh on students with ADHD, I could argue it.
But I don't have the willpower to spout that much bull in one sitting.
Wow that sentence really didn't hold well. I'm tired.
their, they're..
It's going to be okay π
have a beanie emote
<:beanie:463084349642899468>
Stop. I'm too tired to have an aneurysm.
π
Btw this is very interesting op piece in guardian
I will have to read that not-right-now. Right now I try to get 2-3 hours of sleep before I get ready for class.
go sleep now then π
have a good night/day/whatever
The problem isnβt the quality of the tools, in other words, but the institution wielding them. And AI will only make that institution more brutal. The forever war demands that the US sees enemies everywhere. AI promises to find those enemies faster β even if all it takes to be considered an enemy is exhibiting a pattern of behavior that a (classified) machine-learning model associates with hostile activity. Call it death by big data.
it is a ridiculous article
>death by big data
π
who fancies a new plane?
AI will not cause "forever wars" it will cause an end to wars
and you'll end up with either 1 ruler faction that can't be stopped because their AI will be unbeatable.
Or you'll end up with a Skynet that will be able to take over cuz it can beat human capabilities
Thats endgame tho
Atm he is right
Us is waging forever war
theres only 2 steps in the AI for warfare plan
"creating one"
"winning"
Uh oh....
I think the one thing we should be training AI for is judging legal cases
looks like "the left" is taking on the "internet bill of rights"
for or against
Against obviously
saying "we should have an internet bill of rights" and then going on to explain how it should lay down "individual responsibilities"
cos thats what you want in a bill of "rights" .. a list of responsibilities