Message from @wacka
Discord ID: 499917286694453248
negro is not the "n-word" its just the technical term .. as apposed to caucasoid
So CNN can be rascist as fuck whenever they want and they won't get called out for it, while they'll happily call out anyone else who is.
It's all kinds of fucked up.
@wacka thats bullshit bro the f word and n word can be any word that begins with that letter REeeeeeeeeee
y'all so upset with the word nigger
@Braydon its fucker up when cnn doxes people that make fun of them
also i saw the fox news coverage of that... they edited out the point that it was a chris rock reference which they clarified straight away
I didnt see that one @wacka
@Abel lmao
theyre concentrating on the wrong thing... they made fun of him because of his mental illness
everyone can agree thats wrong
And I just read this article about how they must've blackmailed a reddit user who made a Trump meme.
the CNN wrestling tackle?
yeah
if they concentrate on the fact they said negro... theyre going to lose
they "hold the right to reveal his name"
I hated CNN before, I despise CNN now.
I dont think i ever liked cnn my grandma used to watch it when she babysat me
because most on the right.. firstly, its not "the n-word" secondly... most of the right are pro free speech
Then when i grew up i was like cnn i dont need that shit
@wacka agree
50%
CNN stopped having a use when they stopped reporting incidents, and became "expert opinion" pundits on Tweets
CNN should split their service to CNN news and CNN opinion
@Dr.Wol it sucks but this is the evolution of “news” now
at very least they can see then which one gets more ratings
CNN news would become a net-loss
They can't report faster than twitter viral incidents
Im so glad we have access to more shit now because of the intertubes
"News" evolved to becoming everyone with a twitter and a phone
whats left as "mainstream media news" is just refuse of has-beens, and toxic partisanship
you know, it is what it is
it would be interesting if they brought out a new law/rule... where if someone describes themselves in a certain way (like "factual news") they are held to extreme standards where not even opinion pieces are allowed .. I wonder how many would actually subscribe to that description
would still be fake
you'd get lying by omission instead
so you still have freedom of press... but if you want that "presteigious" label you have to have extreme standards and massive repercussions for misleading
well, with that you'd have the tale of 2 narratives
Left thinks CNN is telling the truth and Fox is misleading
Right thinks Fox is telling the truth and CNN is misleading
@Dr.Wol i mentioned this before but i worked at nbc and they actually pulled me into a meeting with them and they asked me what is twitter and shot like that , i was just a IT consultant
so cnn/fox/msnbc would all have to split to 2 companies ... with one having the new title
it would have to stick completely to facts