Message from @Abel

Discord ID: 499912034708750337


2018-10-11 11:45:59 UTC  

go sleep now then πŸ˜›

2018-10-11 11:46:12 UTC  

have a good night/day/whatever

2018-10-11 11:46:17 UTC  

good night

2018-10-11 11:46:39 UTC  

The problem isn’t the quality of the tools, in other words, but the institution wielding them. And AI will only make that institution more brutal. The forever war demands that the US sees enemies everywhere. AI promises to find those enemies faster – even if all it takes to be considered an enemy is exhibiting a pattern of behavior that a (classified) machine-learning model associates with hostile activity. Call it death by big data.

2018-10-11 11:47:04 UTC  

it is a ridiculous article

2018-10-11 11:47:13 UTC  

>death by big data

2018-10-11 11:47:15 UTC  

πŸ˜„

2018-10-11 11:47:18 UTC  

who fancies a new plane?

2018-10-11 11:47:55 UTC  

AI will not cause "forever wars" it will cause an end to wars

2018-10-11 11:49:00 UTC  

and you'll end up with either 1 ruler faction that can't be stopped because their AI will be unbeatable.

Or you'll end up with a Skynet that will be able to take over cuz it can beat human capabilities

2018-10-11 11:49:30 UTC  

Thats endgame tho

2018-10-11 11:49:38 UTC  

Atm he is right

2018-10-11 11:49:47 UTC  

Us is waging forever war

2018-10-11 11:49:57 UTC  

theres only 2 steps in the AI for warfare plan

2018-10-11 11:50:10 UTC  

"creating one"
"winning"

2018-10-11 11:51:03 UTC  

Uh oh....

2018-10-11 11:51:15 UTC  

I think the one thing we should be training AI for is judging legal cases

2018-10-11 11:51:23 UTC  

looks like "the left" is taking on the "internet bill of rights"

2018-10-11 11:51:44 UTC  

for or against

2018-10-11 11:51:56 UTC  

Against obviously

2018-10-11 11:51:58 UTC  

saying "we should have an internet bill of rights" and then going on to explain how it should lay down "individual responsibilities"

2018-10-11 11:52:20 UTC  

cos thats what you want in a bill of "rights" .. a list of responsibilities

2018-10-11 11:52:29 UTC  

so first they create a problem (mass censorship) and then they vie for legislation on a problem they created

2018-10-11 11:53:10 UTC  

the word "moral" already makes me reject whatever this article will propose πŸ˜›

2018-10-11 11:55:36 UTC  

I can tell when someone says "moral" they actually mean censor everyone they don't like in the name of fighting hate speech.

2018-10-11 11:56:26 UTC  

I'm sure this version would advocate for more censorship.

2018-10-11 11:56:48 UTC  

well its simple

Anyone making an appeal to "morals" has no RATIONAL argument,

And since my morals aren't the same as theirs, i can't have faith their morals are beneficial to me

2018-10-11 11:58:04 UTC  

How do you feel about the use of the word Ethical?

2018-10-11 11:58:09 UTC  

The question is

2018-10-11 11:58:20 UTC  

Whose morals do they mean ?

2018-10-11 11:58:43 UTC  

In Pakistan its moral to put the atheist bloger to the sword

2018-10-11 11:58:46 UTC  

πŸ˜”

2018-10-11 11:59:01 UTC  

And i wish i was joking about that

2018-10-11 12:00:15 UTC  

in all muslim countries its moral to throw gay people off roofs πŸ˜‰

2018-10-11 12:00:31 UTC  

Ethics are the same issue as morals,

Your ethics don't match up to mine

2018-10-11 12:00:57 UTC  

a bill of rights should be simple... just a list of individuals' rights... no extra "but the state can do this" or "but heres some responsibilities" etc etc...

2018-10-11 12:01:07 UTC  

:shirt: Check out **Tim Pool's TeeSpring Merch**:
<https://teespring.com/stores/timcast>

2018-10-11 12:01:08 UTC  

:dollar: Support **Tim Pool** on Patreon (exclusive rewards available):
<https://www.patreon.com/timcast>

2018-10-11 12:01:26 UTC  

internet constitution