As funny as this news about Northam is. His replacement will be far worse.

>"Whites have no culture"
Um, try again sweaty

https://youtu.be/PcRyjkYdDxM

"inside sources reveal content of white supremacist poster and stickers"
inside sources AKA your own damn eyes

@Rabbidsith Interesting how they wrote the first few paragraphs to seem like we and Patriot Front are working together. Sneaky.

Indeed.

I think that we should make it clear that we are not in a media statement. Too bad the Twitter is down.

:(

It might come back up, that's what happened last time, fingers crossed. It was bound to happen sooner or later anyways, they'll make gab stronger in the end too

@Salo Saloson It's crazy that a mere smirk or a piece of paper from white males is so powerful it is considered white supremacy. 🤔

Weaponized facial expressions

Ugh, I just went to sign up for a local maker space (lots of cool power tools, laser cutters, etc) and they actually ask you for your pronoun (and include "they" as a choice). They also have "LatinX" as a racial choice. 😒

"Sir, do you know why I pulled you over?"
"No officer."
"Smirking. I'm gonna need to see some ID."

"I'm charging you with *Smirking While White*, that's a felony in current year."

https://www.counter-currents.com/2019/02/black-history-month-resources-7/

https://reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/amdhpy/splc_mark_potoks_office_tracks_the_decline_in/

Kamala Harris has been virtue signaling so hard

We should exploit this with our activism as the democratic primaries near

Any ideas for activism? Really is prime time for it. Democratic candidates will be squabbling to virtue signal over their competition. This has the possibility to boost our activism massively, like when Hillary Clinton gave that infamous speech where the dude yelled “pepe”

Just something to think about in the coming months

I worry that in the very crowded primary field, an IE rebuke of a candidate would galvanize globalist oligarchs' support *for* them, and then they'd use it among the left as a feather in their cap to muster more donors, and make a campaign promise to outlaw white advocacy groups.

I want as much chaos, infighting and disagreeing donors in the Democratic Primary as possible.

Good morning IE, just remember no matter what happens today it is scientifically impossible for your day to be worse than Governor Northam's

Good morning IE. https://youtu.be/_z32BL1KEhU

Good morning. I don't like quentin tarantino movies.

That's the first thing i thought when I woke up

So this morning I was thinking, you could totally take out the profitable aspect of college if low IQ people weren’t allowed in.

I was reading about the history of colleges, and how most scholarships given were based on tests similar to IQ tests, and how that prevented a majority of low IQ people from attending, then realized there’s a direct correlation with the inflation of college tuition and the average intelligence of those who attend.

Not trying to be too rude, but since you’re all familiar with the average IQ of women, this might have something to do with a majority of college attendees being female.

And looking at dropout rates, which have also increased drastically with average intelligence dropping, modern colleges make a surprising amount of money off of failure. Sort of like Planet fitnesses business model, where it targets the physically unfit, lazy, and uncommitted with promises of health, it in that same sense understands that their target demographic will more than likely gain nothing from that membership, they will fail, but they will still have spent money on a membership. College purposely extends a hand out to pseudo intellectuals, the lower/minority classes and delinquents with promises of a turnaround, but that rarely is the case. The low IQ attendee will show up to classes for maybe a couple weeks, or even a couple semesters, gets frustrated with the materials they can’t understand, and abruptly drops out. Or maybe they will even end up in a case where they graduate, but the materials they chose to study are useless and unprofitable for themselves.

If college was built on its original foundation, as an institution for people who can productively use additional knowledge or studies, colleges would be socially AND economically profitable.

Sorry for going off on a tangent I was reading about this a lot last night lmao

@NITRODUBS my impression is that currently there is a lot of debate about whether men or women are smart on average. I have seen both arguments as mainstream arguments. I’d argue men are smarter than women (of the same race) by a couple of points and men are more variable meaning they have more people at the tail ends of the distribution which is why you’ll find more male geniuses and male homeless people

Women are more likely to get degrees in things that they’re less likely to get jobs in their chosen fields for, opting for things like underwater basket weaving or feminist dance theory. So they definitely pick useless degrees more often. I think we’ll see this isn’t profitable when colleges realize who they’re donors are 20 years from now

@NITRODUBS I think a huge part of this is the ease of getting college loans, but I'm not exactly well-versed in the issue. Any ideas?

Women and men have their own pros and cons. Women are usually talented in spoken/verbal outlets while men have more spatial talent.

That’s why men tend to lead in engineering fields

So women still definitely have a place in college, but not in the scale we see today or in the fields they’re currently encouraged into

@Jakob-NY college loans did used to be a lot harder to get, and required a lot more credibility and intelligence

Also I’d like to mention women used to go into college for insignificant degrees just to meet men

That’s how my grandma met my grandpa lmao

@NITRODUBS "Women still definitely have a place in college" oh boy.... We need women at home raising families, not getting useless degrees and pointless careers.