MKUltra
Discord ID: 289867355973091339
282 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Page 1/3
| Next
Tankie is top level leftist
Other than our Lord and Savior Bashar Al-Assad
This is some quality posting.
Rip
Okay
Wool isn't cheap to make. Using it for insulation isn't the first place you want to put it.
That will increase rot and pests.
Pitch could be used.
But that increases fires. Used throughout history.
Indeed.
Thank you.
That's because attacking the 1% is attacking Jews.
I like those flags. They kind of have the future feel.
Like a race destine to conquer the stars
Maybe a little too....... brown?
White Ethnostate and all. Brown flag.
Ye
Cool.
That
That is good.
It is great
Damn, this is a good video.
How to Win Friends and Influence People by Dale Carnegie. Sometimes known as 'The Art of the Violenly Unstoppable Doormat.'
That is a decent self-help book. The only good one I know.
Any study in Philisophy should start with Plato or the Pre-Socratics.
>The Great Works of The Western World.
Shit nigga
That is goodl
I was very disappointed with Becoming a Barbarian.
The Way of Men was amazing and the second was rage tear of a cringy Neo-Pagan.
Along with a 'dindu nuffin' ethics system.
Getting degree in chemical engineering. Have experience blacksmithing. Some woodworking, painting, and paleotechnics. Used MatLab and Mathematica. Learned martials arts. Skilled with blades particularly for HEMA. Proficient in hand sewing; some experience machine sewing. Good at debates. Have a small vegetable garden.
As Julius Evola said-- We must remain at all costs Men standing amongst the ruins. I want an Honor group, a stand for the White race, and a group of people that I don't need to censor my beliefs from. I want a last stand for our people against the Kali Yuga.
VC?
I know what a shotgun argument is.
That isn't what we were doing or what you had described.
Shotgun argument is listed as a synonym of Gish Gollup
I see.
Okay, perhaps they are somewhat loosely related.
>lest they have to admit their ignorance and lack of understanding.
... Well, maybe if idiots weren't making claims then they wouldn't have to be shat on by people who have a better understanding of the concept.
This applies only when the your being coerced into something by concepts over your head. In this case, we were breaking down the terrible arguments that you yourselves did not even understand.
I don't have the aim of persuading you.
I have the aim of preventing you from acting stupid in the future
Kek
I am acting as I was in the chat
You are reading it with a diferent tone because you can't hear my voice.
And because you can try to spin this argument before the spectation of the server.
Maybe you were tending to the kids everytime we said so.
>>>
That hook doesn't even have bait my friend
I never called you an idiot directly.
Indirectly.
You could have done well to avoid it.
>Yeah, I said that there was no bait.
>In the end
In the beginning
It was.
My insult applies to the beginning. Here again you insist on the title of idiot. I'll give it to you if you want.
To the statements specifically really.
"persuading you"
Yeah, we do.
>What Iโm saying is that people naturally drive towards atheism, because it makes more sense.
Literally questioned you and you cannot defend any of your belief. You are still parroting it.
>My son, you are adult now! Will you chose to use knowledge research and intelligence to further your belief? Or will you be an autistic screaching dogmatist?
....
REEEEEEE My belief is logical. Christianity is declining because they are stupid dark age religion... Hurr Durrr -- @P14
>The problem is that religion is not sustainable in the long term, because people will see through the lies
You cannot defend any of your belief.
Kek
..... P14 is typing
>people will see through the lies
>atheism, because it makes more sense.
@P14 Remember when we debated yesterday?
Or are you pretending that didn't happen. Well, if I humiliated that badly then I probably would pretend it didn't happen too.
>Moderninity
Who is strong in moderninity?
The US military is strong
The VDV I imagine is strong
We also debated on the existence of God. I believe you were there for that.
I'm not quite sure I believe that but for now I'll operate under such an assumption. It doesn't give much benefit at this point.
Do you not remember godel's ontological arguement?
Yes, it was writen by Kurt Godel, a Doctorate in mathematic? logic.
Yes
You will.
I chose that one because it was verified by an automated theorem prover.
A program designed to show if a theorem is valid or not.
The simplest one, although not simple, is the Anselm Ontological.
Cosmological arguements are easier to swallow.
Do you want to VC?
Euthyphro
>trying to use logic to prove an entity that inherently defies logic seems a likely a non-starter
>God is illogical so he shouldn't be reasoned towards
>You are a man of reason and cannot be trusted.
Please kill me.
>Existence is not a positive trait
What?!?
What??
How?
>things for granted that aren't necessarily true. ie. Existence is a (positive) trait
To have a positive trait
>Have
>State of being
>Literally asserts postivie existence whereever it is placed.
That is a contigent existence
It may well be true.
You cannot assert that unless you have seen all existence
God would be in the necessary category.
It was showing the conversion.
It was proven on a ATP but all the articles written on its proving were written by autistic fucking neckbeard atheists
282 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Page 1/3
| Next