Voter fraud can be found in the Maricopa County, AZ data as seen by the Overvote (Spoilage) number and the Undervote (no selection) trends for presidential, when compared to the US Senator position as next item on Ballot. 10 times more Overvote for Presidential (5002) vs. Senatorial (458) Overvote events.

Last Wednesday’s lawsuits need to be re-introduced back in court, as the defense lied to the court saying the Overvote only represented 202 voters.

The Undervote is over 8000 uncounted votes at the Presidential part of the ballot. Highly unlikely.

Data is all there! Question is: did the system cause the error, or were the ballots spoiled on that item, where Republicans given a spoiled ballot, while a Democratic given a non-spoiled ballot. It’s not like the voter is tired from filling in so many bobbles as this is the first ballot entry on the form. The witness testimony indicated that they marked the ballot correctly.

The Precinct officials had told the voter press the GREEN button on the scanner, accepting the spoiled ballot to disregard the voter intention for the presidential candidate..., or the Precinct official pressed the GREEN button themselves. All are in violation of election policy.

What should have happened is for those problematic ballots to be placed in to Drawer #3 for manual processing and inspection by a board of watchers (Democratic, Republican and Libertarian) to determine the intent of the voter, where the machine couldn’t.

Voter Fraud identified in Maricopa County, Arizona, submitted to attorney in case CV-2020-014248 ..

The Precinct level data shows that the Overvote errors occurred 200 times at the local polling sites on Election Day voting. For Provisional ballots, Overvote errors occurred 49 times.

For Early Vote and/or Absentee Voting the Overvote errors occurred 4,953 times at Election Counting locations and/or Early Voting locations.

This analysis is still being run for the other 225 contests for Maricopa County, AZ.

The ballots are out of the custody of the Absentee voter when they return their ballot via USPS mail or by dropping the sealed envelope off at a ballot collection station located around Maricopa county, typically near Courthouse facilities. The error interjection most likely occurred at the Absentee ballot processing centers!

You will most likely find a very similar issue with the Undervote count, same issues or errors.

All of these FACTS show a serious level of errors which had an affect on the outcome of the Election results. The current level of analysis has been focused on the Presidential candidates race.

I am a resident of this county, a voter who has gone through the counties Official Election Results and have noticed errors based upon the data available. Attached you will find a summary of what has been uncovered thus far. I am going through the Precinct data currently along with the county individual ballot items (226 of then) to show errors based upon statistical abnormalities. I am also going through other individual counties results (14 other countries) to also show somewhat similar trends of voting errors being observed by counties using electronic tabulation systems (of which it seems that 5 counties are using the Dominion Tabulation systems).

I think based upon the summary of the case that the county committed perjury in their statements that only a very small number of voters (202) were disenfranchised by the Overvote event. The number is actually for Presidential Overvote is 5,002 for Maricopa County, which is a 10 times greater frequency than what is observed for the next ballot item of U.S. Senator for 458 Overvotes. You are going to find a similar number of discomprecencies when reviewing the Undervote, where the Tabulation system wasn't able to find any selection for a presidential candidate.

The Witnesses are the ACTUAL BALLOTS.

The precincts seem to be where the errors were interjected by actions taken for Overvotes not to be routed to the TRAY #3 for visual inspection by the committee of Dems/Repub/Liber to see what the actual intention of the voter was on the disputed ballots. By the voter being asked to "PRESS the GREEN Button'', the election officials disenfranchised the voter of their selection for the presidential candidate of their choice.

(PART 1 of 2)

(PART 2 of 2)

Once I've completed my analysis of the complete set of voting results for the county and state, I will be forwarding the results to this same email address. The data will all be in an EXCEL format, captured from county election documents.

In Summary: it seems that the court was not provided with the actual data of the case and that it wasn't a single voter issue, but a systemwide issue where errors were allowed to occur, violating the Election Laws of Arizona, by Spoiled ballots being given to voters, system scanning errors, overriding errors for injection of spoiled votes into the electronic tabulation equipment, audit and inspections not taking place according to state election law. The counts are enough to have shown that the AUTOMATIC RECOUNT is required and that a systematic review is necessary for the integrity of the VOTE prior to certification by the County, and State of the Official Results. The audit should show that the current results are incorrect regarding the presidential ballot item.

Regards, ....
(Personal identification has been removed)

Read Dan_Sundin about Maricopa County issue with Overvote at 10x number of errors for Presidential vote..

Arizona Maricopa County issues with Voter Fraud has now been submitted to Dan Bongino, Disesh D’Souza.

U.S. Congressmen Paul Gosar (R) Andy Biggs (R), with the 6th and 8th district individuals not available because I’m not in their district (I’ll find another way in).

U.S. Senator Martha McSally was also contacted...

The Democrat members representing the State of Arizona will just have to wait ...

Arizona Maricopa Voter Fraud (CV-2020-014248 Superior Court) the legal firm, State Craft Law is no longer representing the President Trump Campaign Committee, SCL indicating that the litigation referenced has concluded.

How can this be turned back on. Or should a new case be activated within the results of information uncovered? It all seems kind of important. The Trump people need to reactivate the SCL organization as they seem to be up to speed based upon their prior representation.

Their viewpoint was clearly too narrow based upon the limited amount of information and facts (at the time). But both election officials at the county and state levels hid the facts and circumstances of the massive amount of both Overvote and Undervote which was found in the Official Election Data 155,022 rows of detailed records, along with their 72 page PDF. The officials said it only occurred 202 times, a very small, non consequently effect on the outcome of the election results (insignificance they say)!

@RobertGrulerEsq How we get the Maricopa County Voter Fraud case reopened or a new case submitted (CV-2020-014248 Superior Court)

@RobertGrulerEsq It was previously funded by Donald J. Trump for President; Republican National Committee; Arizona Republican Party...

Arizona, Maricopa County... Deep Dive shows Rigging of election results with ballots being injected to the system with a single entry for Presidential candidate Only.

This county represented 61.1% of the vote for Arizona, breakdown:

Early Vote is 1,915,487 and 73.81%
Election Day is 167,878 and 6.47%
Provisional ballots is 6,198 0.24%
Registered Voters 2,595,272 with a turnout of 80.51%.

Ballots cast is 2,089,563 for 2020 General Election.

Secondary issue: massive number of Overvote (Spoiling a vote for a candidate, dare I say TRUMP) at 10 times the rate when compared to the next ballot item of U.S. Senator ticket of Kelly vs. McSally.
(Part 1 of many)

Continued from part 1..

The vast amount of Overvote occurred in the Absentee Processing Centers (the election board has sole control of the ballots for the county at this time) and/or the Early Voting Locations where voters are given an Ballpoint Ink Pen to mark their ballots. Remember SharpieGate, well the election board didn’t let it occur during Early Voting (wonder why).

Breakdown shows 4753 Overvotes (votes stolen, spoiled) in this period of about 27 days. 49 Provisional ballots had Overvote events. All of these 5,002 Overvote occurrences should have been transferred to a bypartician team of inspectors (Dems, Repubs& Libs) to determine the marking and intent of the voter on the first entry of the ballot. But, 5,002 votes for a presidential candidate were lost, not voted.

Next comes the Undervote (no vote indicated in ballot item), with the following breakdown:

Absentee ballots (again is sole possession of election board) and/or Early Voting Centers has 7,920 instances of no vote marked in the ballot (real strange, not). While during Election Day there were 514 instances of no marked ballot for president. And finally, 41 of the Provisional ballots had no marking ballot for president. Now you go through the effort to demand a Provisional ballot, and you can’t mark the first entry, for the most consequential candidate on the entire ballot, I think the mark was there but procedures weren’t followed by the local election officials to allow for the ballot to be corrected or for it to be set aside for the inspection panel of the bipartisan committee to resolve the Machine issue... But GREEN button and it goes down the wormhole (a reference to 1984 and the Ministery of Truth, where facts, fiction, history is burned, along with memories), what Election, nothing to see, Oh look, squirrel.

Part 2 of many ... continued

Continued from Part 2, this is the last part ...

Real interesting isn’t it? The indication is that with the Overvote (multiple markings for President, but only one is allowed, thus spoiling the counting for the ballot for president), Trump vote didn’t count, oops an Overvote event. Then, the very same ballot and scanning machine it is able to successfully count and record the U.S. Senator entry, but for who, Mark Kelly (DEM), oh I really mean to say, that same ballot, a Republican leaning voter, seen and identified to the election board workers, and it too has an event of Martha McSally (REP) being marked but declaimed as an Overvote, another vote lost. Funny how things work out. Is it the scanning machine, the paper ballot modified or a printing error, or was the ballot marked by a third party?

Inquiring minds, broke that mold long ago!

Funny how things work for one party vs. another with fingers on the scale of election rigging.

I do think the 2018 race for U.S. Senator for Arizona suffered a similar fate!

The data came from the Maricopa County Official Election Resuts 2020 web-resource which contains over 155,022 records of textual data from all 111 Precincts, for 226 ballot contests. It is accessible to anyone really interested in trending and comparison to what is said vs. what gets covered up. This data gets used in the preparation of the final report for the county (72 page PDF).

Did I editorialize and call them lies.
— end of pieces, parts —

Remember... In the year of 2020

Scanner-gate
Sharpie-gate
InkPen-gate
Dominion-gate

Will become the hanging chad of the 2000 Bush v. Gore Election nightmare.

https://populist.press/arizona-official-denied-certification-of-votes-that-used-dominion-machines/

It’s not the Bubbles that count, it’s the ability to read the bubble/ovals being marked... then be able to tabulate them correctly without a rigged system putting its thumb on the scale and alter the results in a rigged game of who’s controlling the outcome of the vote.

Kind of reminds one of the:

See no evil, Hear no evil, Speak no evil...

The scanners just can’t see the vote!

Use the link provided to understand why there are both Overvote (more than the max. numbers of candidates that can be selected for a contest, where in the case for Presidential or U.S. Senatorial contests, there can only be ONE, and if more than MAX, the vote is marked as spoiled, no vote counted for ballot item). The Undervote is similar (no vote selection is observed by the Scanner).

Well, here is the reason why:

https://www.eac.gov/sites/default/files/eac_assets/1/6/ESS_FYIDS85017066_DS450_DS850.pdf

The excuses are all blaming the the VOTER for not marking the ballot correctly by the election boards. I’ve been communication with a number of reporters in Maricopa County, Arizona who mimic these talking points of it being the Voters fault.

There are lies and there are them who lie for a purpose of pulling the wool over our eyes to cover their problems of tabulating a TRUE vote by the voters,.

Both the Overvote and Undervote had error or misreporting rates of 10 times greater than normal or average trending for the Presidential race and 8 times greater that N & A trending for the U.S. Senatorial race.

Oh my, say it ain’t so Joe!

@ScottSnowden let’s go through some options of “Tape-Gate”.

If I want to align the piece of tape exactly aligned over the button/oval on the Scanner where it would align to mask the filled in area where the Trump marking on the ballot would appear such as no Trump votes were counted, that would be the reason for an Undervote (none of the candidates were marked, no write-in either, i.e. hand written name of candidate because the other listed prequalified names wasn’t your guy). Thus massive number of missing Trump votes. You don’t need to “be physically rigging” a bunch of machines, just enough to be significant to alter the outcome. You could intersperse rigged machines among straight machines but this would need to be introduced in main ballot counting centers under the control of Boards of Election officials and monitors. If you rig too many machines the numbers would be too far off.

Typically there is a 2% audit matching hand counted ballots to machine counted ballots, with exception reported. Most Precincts are/must be counted to insure one isn’t rigging that locations vote by corrupt officials there. Auditing could catch some of that or show that it is just a Democratic stronghold (LOL, yah right).

Placing tape in a high speed scanner could cause jamming events, plus tape could ware away over time because go the friction of ballots passing over the tape, but there is some tape material which wouldn’t ware out as much.

In regards to an Overvote rigging event to force all Trump votes as spoiled (too many candidates selected), the tape doesn’t work because it would also cause Biden votes to foul, same happens for the 3rd party candidate, Jorgensen. The dirty machine explanation works best, or a software rigged machine better, such as false reading to spoil one type of candidate selection randomizes.

(Part 1 of many)

(Continues from Part 1)

Because of the very low number of ballots selected for an Audit of 2% of the vote in precincts and voting centers (remember most votes in Arizona were cast in Early Voting locations around the counties, in Maricopa County 73.81%, and just 6.47% done on Election Day).

My contentions align with the need to have clean, inspected and calibrated scanners, as well as high-speed tabulation machines. The ballot folding issue needs to be researched more to find a solution in missing the voter’s selection above and below the fold, or maybe pre-folded areas around the ballot should not be used because of the frequencies of Undervote from that area, or just don’t fold the ballots in the first place. Ballots need to be constructed with self-auditing methodology to alert the operation that miscounting is taken place because of “Dirty machines” which need to be taken Out-of-Service for maintenance, cleaning, calibration and inspection, then re-Certified for reintroduction for tabulation service.

In Florida each voting location have one or multiple scanners so that the votes are tabulated real-time. There isn’t a need to bundle up the ballots, transport them to a main center. Once the polls close the Precinct uploads their results to the county election center, who accumulate voter totals for the entire country and forward those results up to the state election center. If re-Scanning (a Recount is necessary, the prescient can just rescan).

@ScottSnowden regarding your other comment of ballots being run through the tabulation machines multiple times by taping over the ballot’s security or certificate number to try stopping the tabulation equipment from auditing multiple passes through the tabulation process.

That would assume that those security measures are in place and that data captured, updated and distributed around the centers for marking duplication of votes from being introduced into the count.

I don’t think these procedures are in place, but trusting the operation/personal from allowing those events for occurring, accidentally or on purpose.

Trust, but verify... then re-verify the verified... then audit to insure that errors and fraud doesn’t occur.

Yes Realz ...

Uncovering the ugly. Maricopa County, Arizona Certified their results ... well there too their Official Reports have errors and holes in them after being attested to as being True & Honest.

Even the local new services believe the Board of Election, who went before the Board of Supervisors saying its done, we did a great job. Signed off as CERTIFIED.

This problem has been around for years, always blaming the VOTERS for the Overvote and Undervote. It is the system

How about we just look at the data... then let the chips fall as they may. Come on Man!

Think, reason and find better ways of doing things... don’t hid it under the box, but exposed to the light of day. But upmost, quit blaming the Voters!

Fix the system PERIOD.

Too funny Rigged USPS to blame now. Slow mail delivery. Got any more stories. I’ll wait.

This isn’t a Democratic vs. Republican issue... it about capturing the intent expressed in the Ballot for how we engage with out country as our part in society and civics, a citizens duty.

Sell me a USPS bridge and I’ll sell you some of my Florida Swamp.

I want the System of voting to just work. Don’t you get it.

Well, doing my civic duty, I went down and turned my Absentee Ballot into a collection station. Come on Man.

You do know that 73.81% of the voters in Maricopa County, Arizona went to Early Voting for a 27 day period of time to vote. Only 6.47% went to their local precincts in Election Day to vote... This very trend was repeated across many states.

Audits should be strong and exacting in all processes, regardless. Check the checkers, then check them too. Never let the easy excuses to hid the facts.

I’m not blaming the citizens from slowing down the mail. Just stop the useless junk mail ... kind of what you do with the junk email and spam.

My comments made for Citizens/ Voters being the cause for the Overvote and Undervote... which was the subject for my post to begin with.

The post office was never the main method of collecting the vote! But in the year of Covid it became a wiping post.

The post office was there to process the absentee balloting, which is and always has been a subset of those who were not going to be available to go to their precincts to vote on Election Day.

That precede was expanded to weeks out with Early Voting.

And There are deadlines of getting your vote in to the Election Board, otherwise it is considered to be a “Late Ballot” thus uncounted.

The individual state legislators established their election law, which run the term of the election window... if they need to be changed, the next legislative body determines that, the courts don’t change election law, nor do the Secretary of State... nor Governors. If the laws are unconstitutional, then the courts can be involved..,

State Law says, received by the Board of Elections by the Election Day on or before the polls close.

Just do your job and vote early, mail or in person.

The technical description of an Overvote is when a voter marks two (or more entries for a ballot contest that calls for just one entry. In some contest there can be more than one entry, like two or three.

I think the Overvote vote you are referring to in Nevada is regarding to having more votes collected in precincts than are registered to vote in that precinct. Which is confusing l. I’ll admit.

The Overvote & Undervote issues that have been facings voters in this year as in past is the Disenfranchisement issue I’m addressing with the initial post/comment.

Technically Nevada and other states have instances of Over Counting collected votes base upon registered voters being associated with precincts, where poll books don’t match with voters and their signatures, likewise with voters being allow to vote multiple times because of checks & balances not being in place. Purple ink on a digit would stop that issue.

LoL... James, there is just like 8,114 non-citizens voted in the Maricopa County, Arizona election on the Federal ballot for Candidates, where there 17,910 FEDERAL ONLY voters registered in the county.

Do some research. Do you want the Precinct that they are located in. The data was provided for FREE, all 155,200 recorded of it in their official TEXT CVS data resource.

Numbers don’t lie, but political people lie when they open their mouths..

Everyone has their own objectives in a political world, call it story telling m, getting ones points across, gaining that key sound bites out for the news cycle, gaining over one’s rival. It’s a game played to the Nines! With words instead of knives!

Look up the term of Postcard Ballot Requests

Regarding illegals being able to vote, look at California and Maryland allowing for illegals to gain access to voter registration.

Why has Harris County in Texas become a FEDERAL ONLY issue?

Why in Arizona did a statewide law need to be put in place so that non-citizens would not be allowed in being counted where they voted for state contests, local, county and across the state.

Well, I guess I messed with the hornets nest this morning...

The founder envisioned the newspapers to be a force of getting information out to an educated citizen, if he couldn’t read, the papers were read by a reader in the town square or tavern...

Today that process has all changed to be spun and twisted. The mainstream media has become a political player, a media outlet aligned with this party or that.

No, Civil War isn’t justifiable in a nation of United States of America in which we stand....

Until we don’t stand any longer, as a “got to destroy it mind set is allowed to take control” fundamental change America... But is it for the better or worse... we must desire it make it better, or go down the road of other failed nations of the worlds history.

You better retrieve that Sharpie-Gate... the gate will be opened and InkPen-Gate will be added .

I was referring to the Brown Sharpie being trashed during the YouTube show.

Not how Election Law is written. Refer to the different state election statutes.

@RobertBarnes @VivaFrei

From Maricopa County, Arizona (Statewide Information n/a... Read to the bottom for description of Federal ONLY):

Statewide data would have been at least a 1.898 times larger number, because it is estimated that there are approx. 34,000 Federal ONLY voters registered in the state, while there are 17,910 in Maricopa County ( State estimate was provided Monday at the meetings with the State Representative & Senators at the Hyatt Regency Phoenix, 11 hour record on YouTube).

The difference in non Citizens in being allowed to vote (Federal ONLY) is out of control and has had an effect upon the 2020 Election:

2020 there were 8,114 illegal votes
2018 there were 1,763 illegal votes
2016 there were 2,872 illegal votes
2014 there were 209 illegal votes
2012 there were 91 illegal votes
2010 there were -0- illegal votes
2008 there were -0- illegal votes
2006 there were 146 illegal votes
2004 there were -0- illegal votes
2002 there were -0- illegal votes
2000 there were -0- illegal votes

(Based upon the summary from each year listed above against official reports at the county level).

Statewide Voter registration laws have changed over the years. The Federal ONLY issue became such a concern that in 2019 House Bill 2039 was passed and signed into law, amending Section 16-616, 16-549 and Chapter 107, Section 4, and requiring that the Secretary of State to update the Website with this Federal ONLY information, with the current counts within 60-days of an election.

And they say that there is NO, non Citizens voting in Federal Elections, but the information provided above proves otherwise.

This breakout is a requirement of Arizona by election law so that no illegal votes can be cast and recorded against any elections at the state, county, city or local levels.

Even the dog catcher!
Say ain’t so, Joe?

( continued from prior post )

Federal ONLY is an individual who is a resident of Arizona, who has property that they reside in, lease or rental agreement, bank records, utilities bill with those addresses, Arizona Driver License or Identification Card. This person has not provided yet a form of proof of citizenship by birth certificate, USA Passport or Naturalized Citizenship (all verified by the federal government). For travel on TSA you must provide the later to get a STAR on your ID to fly, and to enter Federal Facilities.

Read the post

Same issue in Georgia

Read Comments that I submitted on yesterday’s comment section (on YouTube) to see why there are Errors of Overvote & Undervote

https://parler.com/profile/DanSundinEmail/posts

Evidence there if one looks.