#general (Discord ID: 363104510153064452) in Front And Center, page 26
Security Advisory: Links in messages may lead to maliciously operated websites that could track your IP address and reveal your identity, or they may contain harmful files. The DiscordLeaks team does not check links and cannot make any statements about the safety of following these links.
Some ways to protect yourself are:
- Do not open files downloaded from links, and do not run any programs that try to download themselves to your computer.
- Use anonymization measures such as Tor Browser or a VPN.
If you are using the Privacy Badger or other privacy extensions, you may need to whitelist Discord and related domains in order for the images to load.
Laws don't apply to Jews, silly.
Sup Duff. Welcome
Technically it'd be Wuff ^
Damn, we're growing fast, love this feeling
Welcome aboard, you're joining us in Texas right?
Yes sir, Thanks!
I believe were staying with Eric
There's 3 of us right now
Luci isn't gonna make it 😦
Damn. That sucks
https://www.facebook.com/KennethAStoner/posts/10210215007958339?comment_tracking=%7B%22tn%22%3A%22O%22%7D found some old butthurt on my initiation posters
What were the comments on it?
they were bitching about the north west front for some reason
one shit lib teacher brough my posters to her class when you consiter this http://www.king5.com/news/local/house-with-racist-graffiti-sells-in-gig-harbor/282842311 and this http://q13fox.com/2017/09/29/suspect-painted-racist-message-at-gig-harbor-school-set-fire-that-damaged-classrooms-police-say/ it might be a bad idea on her part
not that I endorse illeagal action in anyway FBI
Targeting high schools is lame, also arson is just dumb.
AU is that you?
gen z is ... pretty extreme
yeah I was pretty surprised to find this
The commies still do not realize I am a nazi, day 4
I mean I guess we can all agree on the last on
also we shouldnt bash pedos they should be sent to gulags.
@Pale Horse - FL is that real ive seen it floating around twitter?
North American Boy Lovers Association
They were on south park like ten years ago
I though south park made that up
No it's real.
And yes it is.
I guess antifa is having a protest in my city tomorrow. They had one next to one of my favorite bars last week to.
Didn't know there were that many here
Fuckin ruining yer night out with da boizz, and interrupting happy drinking hour, and sheeit.
@Steven MI Standard lone wolf procedure, leave some stickers for them on every light post around.
They should get bashed for that.
Sons of bitches. Right. I found a few of their organizers on FB. Should start seeing where their going and put up some stickers the night before. Rustle their jimmies a little
If you find enough info you might be able to poster a place they frequent
Good news is most these fucks look like they have real low test levels. If there ever was a confrontation I don't feel like they could do much damage.
Thats why they use clubs
@Steven MI. No shit. They wish they were brown faggots. Absolutely degenerate.
They wish they were us.
Here's a few.
Dudes need to eat a steak and hit the gym
Free helicopter rides 👦
One of the best cures for communists
That moment when you find out your roommate isnt gay. 😀 but hes a communist sympathizer.👬🔫👿
Well at least you know where he lives when it's time to send him to a camp
Yeah or when it's time to hang him by his neck; white power 🙋
I have two communist sympathizing roommates, and a faggot in the next suite. Lol at least one of my roommates is low key fascist with me though.
Haha. You should post shenanigans trying to trigger them.
lol im in a suite too. I have one roomate from Lousiania so he's pretty woke on these issues
I like Louisiana. Minus the niggers of course.
french niggers are weird
yeah he says the same thing
Niggers gon nig
Antifa terrorist page Anti-Racist Action Tallahassee has been removed by it's owner thanks to my actions. Hail Victory!
@Pale Horse - FL what a beautiful thing to wake up to. Nice work man!
*Another wonderfully written application by a very sincere person.*
Name: fuck patriot front
Email: [email protected]
Age: over 65
Political Ideology: fuck patriot front, ignorance at its finest
Drugs cigarettes: alcohol: marijuana: other: fuck you ignorant sheep, followers
Religious Beliefs: think for your self, critical thinking, fuck followers and sheep like patriot front
Reason: to fuck all you sheep up, i already joined, i'm there ready to fuck patriot front up
Skills: help get rid of patriot front sheep/follewers
Read Manifesto: Yes
@Pale Horse - FL Banner looks fake, Cernovith made it himself.
I’m really confused about the no pedo bashing line
Cernovich made the banner to make Antifa look bad.
Which makes a lot of sense, because NAMbLA isn't a thing, and doesn't have activists. Including it on the visual there makes it *really* hard to believe outside of a joke.
I thought Nambla was an actual thing? I read somewhere they used to actual hold meetings until they were infiltrated
Just read the post, apparently they’re now “dormant”
Well yes it was a thing, but if it still does have members, they aren't going black bloc in the streets.
If you ever hear folks bringing up how terrible and awful our school systems are, and why the system, not the students, are the cause for the low grades, show them this.
Yeah man wtf I didn't realize this was a racist organization
Also lol at the DR
Funnily enough they're still better off than Haiti
Yeah our niggers are at least smarter than most average African niggers.
Still not nearly smart enough, but its something.
He may be a diamond in the ruff
Well he clearly shows dedication, going to the courthouse to change his name to Fuck Patriot Front before applying is a bold move, showing that he must be confident in his acceptance.
I move to accept him. Any seconds?
He says he wants to get rid of the unthinking sheep. I think thats a fairly agreeable idea.
Yeah he seems to really hate sheep
Naturally a counter cultural group that has to hide their identities to avoid social crucifixion is full of conformists
"Read Manifesto: Yes"
Why *wool*d you like to kill all the sheep? What purpose would that serve?
I like how this is the only thing he actually answered
Is saying "save the boer" too much for my normie account 🤔
Like he was done with his tirade
Well you learn something new everyday
If you select "no" it should just send an automatic denial email
Redirected to birthright
It just means I autoignore those apps, but I've yet to see one with it marked "no".
Just redirect to that URL
Went to visit family over weekend. One of my cousins has a hippo-sized Filipino gf. I gotta shut that down. Redpill him while he's young.
Good god no. You farm the rice, you pay the price.
Do we have any new posters yet? I am going to hit the printing service tomorrow and get a couple hundred posters.
I think we were going to upload that "Reject the false dichotomy" one.
That one was good, just needs our url in there somewhere
Hey here's an idea for a coordinated op. It's something I'm going to do in Houston very soon. Poster both a mosque and synagogue the same night in multiple cities. You haven't seen kvetching until you poster a synagogue
There's that small Jewish university I wanted to hit not too far from here
Just bear in mind that stakes are higher given hate crime laws
And the prevalence of Jewish lawyers
More danger. More reward
Yeah... might want to take extra extra extra precautions.
I'm aware. We've done this before. Make sure nothing is used that could be construed as vandalism
If you do a church, mosque, and synagogue, in the same night, it might provide some legal protection from hate vague hate crime statutes. It would at least be a defense to prosecution. But if anyone wanted to do that, I would suggest not doing it for a while given allegations that discord as a whole may not be able to secure.
Don't do churches
I'm not suggesting anyone do anything. I'm just remarking on ways to protect oneself in a hypothetical situation, famo
I wouldn't suggest going near mosques or synagogues for the time being, colleges and urban areas are a safe bet for posters.
Now, if someone finds meeting times and rooms for Jewish organizations on campuses, that would be a safe compromise, provided our guys can legally gain entry to the buildings
Saturday December 9th there's a human rights walk and festival on the Woodlands if any Houston goys want to come with me. The turds that put it on are closet commies looking to virtue signal.
I know we have some no shit NatSocs in here, so I may be in the minority, but does anyone agree with the statement "Every grown-up has the right to do a job, to a fair wage for their work, and to join a trade union."
Only white ones
In their own nation, sure.
My libertarian autism is triggered
Shit doesn't matter in an ethnostate
Shit (policy) does matter in a nation state, but it is not a place we're in to dictate at the moment. ^^
Yea i didn't mean to be too general.
The right to a job means someone is compelled to provide you with a job.
The reason it doesn't matter is that, if your society is set up right, joblessness is not a problem the way we have it today
I agree. Get the jews out and have banking not protected by the state and things improve dramatically.
@AugustoPinochet(Paul)TX I do not agree with that statement if we're talking generally speaking. If we're talking natural right, then the answer is no. If we're taking legal rights, then that is a matter of contract.
https://youtu.be/zqLPv-Qhu9Q Hearing from Twitter Jewbook and Jewgle reps about censoring "Russian meddling" or as we know it, the alt-right white nationalist movement
A society can establish the legal right to a job.
You can restrict the legal right to citizens, and restrict citizenship to people who have already shown some act of duty to the nation. A family man might have more of a right than a young college kid, and a veteran even moreso.
Those all being legal rights maintained by the governent.
What about the employer? Doesn't he have the right to hire whomever he sees fit? What if he wants a young man over an old one or vice versa?
Well the employer could be the State in the instances where the private market is not an option or preferable.
And yes I said legal right in the first sentence I believe.
I'm hesitant to state intervention. I typically don't like the term "rights".
Except for property rights.
Rights are anything a nation is willing to protect as such.
A right to having your left ear dyed blue at the age of 67 is a right as long as people can allow the State to support it, or to prevent the State from infringing on it.
Natural rights are a bit different, and arguably much more muddy because nature's laws don't really include rights. That's a human thing. A good thing, in my opinion, as far as social constructs go.
@AugustoPinochet(Paul)TX I think the idea of natural rights is born from a sense of property. You own yourself. i.e. You are in possession of the self. All property rights begin with possession.
@Thomas Ryan The fine line between despotism and rule of law is the ability to show the soudness of the moral theories you're implementing.
Apart from natural rights, people like to come up with new entitlements and call them rights in order to lobby governments. And govs sell these in exchange for votes. This is the action of leech ass lower species. They look at hard built prosperity and they come up with ways to tap into it. It always ends up the hard workers being forced to pick up the slack of the leeches
*"The liberal gentlemen are asked to tell me if there ever was in history a Government based exclusively on the consent of the people and renouncing the employment of any kind of force. Such a Government has never existed and it never will exist. Consent is as changeable as the sands of the seashore. It cannot always exist. Nor can it ever be entire. No Government has ever existed which has managed to make everybody it governed happy. Whatever solution you happen to give to any problem, whatever, you—even were you participants of divine wisdom—must inevitably create a class of malcontents. If so far geometry has not succeeded in squaring the circle, still less have politics managed to do it. Allowing as an axiom that any governmental decision creates discontented people, how are you to prevent this discontent from growing and becoming a danger for the safety of the State? You prevent it by means of force; by surrounding the mass with force; by employing this force without pity when it is necessary to do so. Take away force from any Government whatever—and physical armed force is meant here—and leave only its immortal principles—and that Government will be at the mercy of the first organized group which has made up its mind to beat it."*
If the will of the people does not coincide with the state, what then?
Right now we are in that very struggle with the state.
Then the State must overcome the people, or the people must overcome the State.
When you say state or government just think of Lindsey Graham and Mitch McConnell.
I don't want fags like that having any dominion over my life.
There is our current State, which we are seeking to overcome, and then the State we would like to see implemented. The difference is that one is legitimate and one is not.
My inner AnCap would rather see a state like my HOA.
But so long as we have feral niggers and jews surrounding us, it's a moot point.
But at least we can all have a civilized discussion about the legitimacy and role of the state without shooting each other.
'Multiple injured' in shooting in downtown Manhattan - Daily Mail
I believe the dailystormer is down again...
Stormer is still working for me.
A nation state, and a properly Fascist cohesion between the people and their government requires cooperation. Cooperation cannot happen if the people are not bound to cooperate with the state, and nothing is expected of them as far as duty is concerned. If there's nothing keeping the contract together, there's no reason for, as Mussolini said, and I think he's a smart guy, that the govt won't be at the mercy of the first organized group of people seeking to enslave the people.
Remember. Fascism, E Pluribus Unum, strength through unity.
@Smiter-IL are you on vpn? sometimes the normie site gets blocked when I use vpn
The idea of "consent of the governed" is in line with whether or not the state represents the will of the people.
Stormer worked for me yesterday afternoon.
Goebbels has a quote how NatSoc isn't Fascism, and it always confused me, because NatSoc seems completely fascist in concept, but very pragmatic to adapt to the needs of your people.
Mussolini was a civic nationalist if I'm not mistaken.
I am not on vpn, and I tried Firefox, and chrome. DNS server not found.
The governed cannot always consent to what is in their best interests, and if we were in a position to legislate the nation into a better spot, people or "the governed" would fight us as we tore away their gay orgies, or Jewish loans, or opioids, or generally not give consent.
My problem is that government tends to attract the worst kinds of people to power (the aforementioned fags). Once in power their faggotry is used to ruin the citizenry.
Thats why fascism is great.
Because it eliminates that.
A democratic govt allows certain people to gain footholds where other systems do not offer the same incentive.
Thomas, yes, people's preferences change. But, that doesn't change the nature of the law enforced, i.e. is it universal or not? Is it of sound moral theory, or not? If you have a grievence (i.e. valid moral objection), then it is an imperative that this objection be considered or else you've created an environment for tyranny.
Elaborate on what you mean by laws being universal. And moral theory, or what people think is right and wrong, is as contentious and fluid topic as there can be.
Even interpretations of natural law are just that. Interpretations. Ultimately the best way to oppose tyranny or immoral force, is by overcoming the State, via moral force.
Truck of peace in NYC in case anyone missed it. This myster meat guy did better than the last one I think.
@Thomas Ryan Natural law is built upon the observation that there is a natural order to things — which is to say that nothing is random (not to imply that every event has purpose).
If you accept that there is a natural order to things (i.e. chaos theory), then it’s safe to assume that there is a natural order to human behavior, i.e. it’s not random.
Thus, if that is accepted, then it is safe to assume that there are particular actions that lead to particular outcomes. Meaning: The human experience is not random.
So, that said, if it is sound to hold that no outcome is random (i.e. no such thing as true random), then there must be a natural law governing our experiences regardless of how ignorant we are of its influence on events as well as to what degree. In the past, this force — and all natural forces for that matter — were commonly referred to as ‘god’. Thus, prior to secularism, in the hierarchy of law, god was supreme. We have the same centralized institution today, except now there is no deity. The state is the new fictional entity most hold as being supreme.
More importantly, if there is a goal like justice (a description of a particular experience), then there must be *laws* (i.e. principles) affecting events that lead to such outcomes. And, so, the discovery of such principles is the pursuit of the rule of law. Or, better said, the pursuit of justice.
Anyone that demands justice is by default acknowledging there are natural laws, otherwise ‘justice’ is a meaningless word, i.e. it’s not objective.
If what I say is sound, then these ‘laws’ should not be confused with edicts — which are decrees granted the force of law by the bonds created among men, i.e. contracts, so long as there is consent. More so, since all legal rights are the product of contract, what are natural rights?
The absence of consent is slavery.
I agree that humans are bound by their nature to certain experiences, but how is the State a fictional entity? Do you deny the possibility of someone being made to do something they don't consent to that is ultimately good for them?
The one giving consent can be wrong, and the one receiving it, or otherwise, can be right.
In America we have an order of common law in order to protest the discoveries we made. In contrast, some jurisdiction in the world have civil law which allows for any law to be interpreted in anyway the arbiter sees fit.
The way in which one system overcomes the other, and the right usually ends up winning is because systems that do not adhere to, or seek to dismantle human nature, of which heirarchy is an important part, those societies fail because the nature of people's laws conflict with the laws of the govt, making them dysfunctional and contradictory.
The use of force in self-defense or thrid-party defense is justified. Anything outside of that scope begins to get into acts of conquest or acts of aggression against others.
Our nation was founded on conquest and aggression on a civilizational scale, and the primary natural currency of all societies is ultimately violence, or the threat of it.
From a natural and very broadly historical perspective, Rule A does better than Rule B because the person or people behind Rule A commit successful aggression or conquest against the person or people behind Rule B, or that Rule B is so flawed by means of contradicting natural laws that it fails on its own.
We're getting into tribalism there. I thought the scope of the discussion was limited to governance of our people.
I don't think even Americans are a singular mass that all fall into a category of being able to be governed with a feather light hand. Not at this stage, and likely not for a long time.
To quote Mosley: "By giving Government the power to act, Fascism brings not the end of freedom but the beginning of freedom"
I don't think anyone is making the claim, "governed with a feather light hand." The measures that leads to the emergence of the rule of law are very strict. So, neither light nor hard, but rather firm. i.e. Walking the fine line between order and chaos.
The whole point of this all is that any man has the right to invoke the law thereby giving us the ability as a collective to consider all possible angles available to us at a given time. Omniscience is impossible, right? But this methodology gives us the closest we can to come to governing with the benevolence of god.
I get you. Everyone has the right to be a critic.
As long as by critic you mean a right to express a grievance, then I think we found agreement
I meant to criticize, or offer an opinion that is different from another's. So yeah, same thing.
On a lighter note, it is my personal opinion that in the ethnostate all men should have a right to have a toilet where his balls do not dip into the water while taking a shit because all balls do not swing equally.
No toilet can hold these
All balls should dangle freely. http://media1.giphy.com/media/m12GiqBQywgbS/giphy.gif
Anglin and the 2nd in command (I think, around that) in TWP are duking it out on Gab, publicly. I think Gab actually allows DMs that could make this less... well, public.
Anglin makes solid points. But I wish he didn't have to make them
allow me to clarify. I think he is doing what is needed. I simply wish it wasn't.
How many guys did we have at Shelbysville?
I thought we had one guy there. I thought wrong apparently.
Nope, we didn't send anyone.
I was in contact with a local Cville veteran today who also told me he was at Shelbysville. I belive he went with the NSM, but he said hes not a part of it. The guy was telling me it was a total goon fest.
Apparently some people there even took to spooking normie locals for lolz.
We considered sending Z because he knows so many folks but with Gainesville and Austin coming up it wasn't practical. I'm glad we didn't send anyone honestly. It was basically Pikeville 2.
Just told some guy in a bar to "watch his profanity". I love fucking with people.
Bruh, if you knew me... I was literally yelling "fuck that nigger" during the Mayweather fight.
If it was a UFC ring, he would have gotten lynched
If it was a small town in Texas he would've been lynched...
The gay bartender has a black boyfriend...
Resist the urge to purge
Hopefully they give each other AIDS
Well I got asked to leave.
Give them a salute goodbye.
no way, why???
wait, what happened?
"Does it matter whether or not the Antifa pro-pedo banner was a false flag given how funny it is? 😄 "
well I'll be, I actually agree with PJW
He's saying that because they totally faked it.
*ANOTHER GREAT APP FROM OUR SENSIBLE OPPOSITION*
Name: Black Mandingo
Email: [email protected]
Political Ideology: rapes white bitches
Drugs cigarettes: alcohol: marijuana: other: yes
Religios Beliefs: satanist
Reason: Because Patriotism
Skills: with my big cock i have the power to rule all
Read Manifesto: Yes
hahaha wtf, these are great
Email: [email protected]
Age: over 65
Political Ideology: Gay
Drugs cigarettes: yes alcohol: yes marijuana: yes other: yes yes
Religios Beliefs: Hindu
Reason: Bc i love ur mun
Skills: Im really good at doggystle
Read Manifesto: No\
Name: Suck a dick
Email: Suck a dick @suck a dick.com
Political Ideology: Quit being racist h stupid fucks
Drugs cigarettes: alcohol: marijuana: other: yes yes
Reason: Go to the fucking ocean and drown racist fucks
Skills: How to hang all the racists fucks that exist
Read Manifesto: Yes