gender-issues
Discord ID: 513098563924918273
71,774 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 267/288
| Next
xoxo
except jesushand
he's ugly
What about me
ya ur cute
Lmao u don't even know what i look like
ya i do
Ok tell me
ugly
Like a bitch
ha ha ha
I bet your ugly too
nope
im pretty
PROVE IT
nope
๐ฆง
No proof or It ain't real
SHE ISN'T REAL
Iโm a helicopter
Same ugh we're twinning
<:honk:583238347124637707>
Yโall kinda gay ngl
Imagine actually using the term asexual
What would you prefer?
You can just say you aren't a coomer
Like just because you aren't controlled by impulse like that doesn't mean you should use a term made up by gays
I mean true
But its the best way to describe the condition
No it isn't doe
I don't get how using a term made up by people that are basically the enemy is a good thing
Explain to me how it isnt?
It's just used by progressives to label anyone who isn't a coomer as something not normal
Not really
Their entire political ideology is based off of doing that
I mean
What do we call those people without sexual attraction then?
incels
monks ๐
<:kek:538084230408830987>
I think withdrawing your sexual energy entirely is a bad idea
It's kinda based ngl
I've tried to nofap... didnt work
Your not withdrawing it
its good to do in small weekly intervals
Weakling check
Some are born that way
Some people go through trauma
but like if you hold it in forever, you put yourself at risk for prostate cancer
the optimal amount of times to coom in a month is 23
Idc about getting cancer
It's a very, very short reduction in the chance of it
and it isn't worth the other effects
which effects
I mean, some people can control it. Its not something you choose
Yes it is
That would be celibacy
@SoCalFX You've never researched any of the effects that come along side doing stuff like that?
side effects of masturbation?
People cant choose mental illness my guy
Its just a part of you
Yes they can
oooh sick bern gr
Not really
Mental illness is just whatever society deems as a mental problem
like I always say, its not mental illness if you keep it to yourself
People donโt choose to be born with schizophrenia
They just are
Well....
highly debatable
schiz is a horse of a diff color than depression or anxiety
most people dont suffer from schiz
Some mental illnesses are genetic, and others are situational
I wonder what percent of the population has it
Same with asexuality
Definitely not the same with sexuality
Homosexuality is degenerate
Worldwide, its 1%
Asexuality is a chemical imbalance of the kind
Sexuality is nowhere near the same
Its not sexuality but the lack thereof
The "chemical imbalance" is still an unproven theory, they have no scientific proof that antidepressants work
Id say its mostly placebo
Antidepressants?
where does that factor in
or any of these psych meds
I think it does worse things to you than it does fix anything
I guess?
I donโt know how we got here honestly
I think you brought up the mental illness
I said asexuality is a mental illness
And you donโt choose to be so
Are furrys classified as a gender?
they're classified as mentally ill
attention seeking idiots
and donโt forget devotees of *furry* animals
@Deleted User asexuality isn't a chemical imbalance it's a lack of sexual hormones and lack of functioning genitalia.
pls don't spread misinformation uwu
asexuality isn't a mental illness either it's a sexual mutation
dummy head
Hormones being chemicals
<:oof:555925164966019093>
not the same thing uwu :33333
@princess asexual aka monk mode
monks are stronk volcels
I seen a dude use a drill on his head like it was nothing
Monks are crazy
I wish I could train similar like that for just 1 year
Without the drilling the head part๐
<:dogshock:625722482451546152>
they hella stronk
Asexuality is simply someone not devoting their energies to sexual behavior. They can have normal gonads and normal hormone levels. They're just not interested.
Nothing wrong with it. Some of them are just people who live normal lives and some are geniuses like nicholas tesla
Tesla was a zoophile
he was into pigeons
I'm into caged animals too
pigeons should be free
my grandpa is also having pigeons
let's them free for daily fly
@Krupnik what? Where does it says telsa was into animals I never heard about that. I know he had a pet but that's it
@NobleBeing he was writing that he is in love with one pigeon "like one is in love with a woman"
But he was asexual he said he wasn't at all interested in sex
Maybe he meant he loved the bird as much as a person. I know i read he thought dating and
Meeting women and just normal talking to people was a waste of time. I think the bird was just a pet who he had a bond with. I don't think it was sexual unless someone has prove. Just my opinion.
You can be in love with something or someone without wanting to shag them
or it
If you write "be in love like someone is in love with a woman" than it leaves there little room for interpretation
Tesla was a furry, it happens
I still say Tesla was referring to an ideal, not a reality
But seeing as he's not around to interrogate, we'll just have to leave it as unsolvable
There are 2 genders
I'm 40 and I have tik tok bc all the 12 year old girls
hot
Yes
I stick horse cocks up my ass
same
Bruh wanna smash
ok
There are 2 genders
no genders
I think just one gender!!
Gender and sex are the same.
Obviously not...nice try though
god made two genders boy and girl
learn yalls facts
and then god made dumbasses like you
how sad
Says the one who probably wants Biden win the race ๐
there are 2 genders
This nigga spitting facts.
enviar desnudos
Gender and sex are the same
No
wrong
females are simply inferior
@Plosi nah stubborn people are.
aight bet
why the new account?
๐คฃ
RACOON*
what does that mean
TRASH JUNK RAT*
aren't racoons suppose to be smart and shit?
He sure wasn't gonna find his real name and write it on my death note.
GG @JULIO2BEASTLY, you just advanced to level 2!
???
nig are you on something?
NANI? A DEATH NOTE YOU SAY.<:yus:538083968881524747>
๐
bruh has coronavirus
He fucked up he thinks he's not toxic but truly is if you don't switch characters.
deathnote funni ๐คก
I'm fucking crying
MHM.
GONNA PUT HIS NAME IN THE LEGENDARY BOOK OF FINE.
Anyways I'll do it later I'm sleepy night.
mhm right
@Plosi haha you think I'm joking <:peepodumb:538083903835996176>
ok sure
fuck these new member weebs
this isn't fucking anime
bitch ass nig
๐ Muted `Plosi#2024` for `1 day`
There are 2 gende
Genders*
Cool
I want to die in a car accident after reading that
-1 gender
0 genders +/- 4 genders
Hate to break it to ya... there's only 2 genders
Thatโs what I said
0 +/- 4
Between -4 and 4 genders
Call me old fashioned, but I believe antimarriage is between a negative man and a woman
Yeah, anti divorce rates have been skyrocketing, where are the anti family values?
The number one cause of teen pregnancy is aborting negative children
Wot
Gay
Who let you back?
It ain't any of your business
๐ Muted `GOD#4651` for `1 week`
I canโt feel my mouth
uwu
https://files.catbox.moe/qwtwqt.jpg
This server is kind of a dumpster fire, isn't it?
Yeah, although a particularly shit mod just left so maybe less so now.
hate it when women say cant hit back
No one should hit in the first place >.<
I haven't seen any abortion convos on here that I can remember
Kinda weird
there have been quite a lot but in the general chat
I haven't seen any in general
Hmmm
wait nvm
there's been a lot
but all I remember is something about killing women who get abortions
Has anyone here but me participated in providing an abortion?
Just curious
Hmm
I'm not pro life or pro choice. I'm pro education, the new born baby is technically a clump of cells and it isn't a living person yet. I don't believe we should do abortions in late stages of pregnancy, but we should also do abortions because some people might be victims of rape.
The arbitrary constitution or configuration of cells is not, in itself, sufficient to define what is and is not a property of human life.
What are categorical truths regarding the nature of those cells?
1: They are genetically distinct from both parents; amalgamated, yes, but also distinct through mutation (particularly on the Y chromosome)
2: They self-replicate and possess an individual metabolism
The question should never be "what constitutes life", because by all meaningful definitions even a zygote is "alive"; the question of whether or not it is self-sufficient or even self-aware is irrelevant; neo-natal infants do not develop self-awareness until they are 6-12 months old. Any argument that can justify the termination of a zygote can also be used to rationalize the murder of an infant; the difference is by degrees.
In fact; any argument used to justify abortion on the premise of life-utility or deontological/arbitrary definitions can be used to justify murder.
"A fetus feels no pain until X point in time"
By this rationale it should be moral for me to murder a quadriplegic as long as the killing blow falls below the neck.
"A fetus is not self-aware"
By this rationale it should be morally permissible for me to murder a severely retarded person, or a person in a vegetative state/coma.
"A fetus cannot survive by itself"
By this rationale, as previously stated, it should be morally permissible for me to murder a 1-12 month old child.
The only abortion question that is logically and morally consistent is "If this thing is a burden, why can I not kill it"
Everything else, literally every other argument, is an argument of convenience (which is ironic, because the whole subject, and act of abortion boils down to what is and is not convenient) to distance one's self from that nihilistic reality.
And I think, if framed in such a way, most people would understand that abortion is *wrong*; now the question is then... does that matter? Does it matter if it is categorically wrong? Window dressing the issue to divorce it from this single moral question doesn't change the fact that this is *the* moral question.
"Does it matter if it's wrong?"
In a round-about way, no, not really. But in every significant way, YES, it matters. It matters for the same reason we look down at, and are disgusted by, alcoholics getting liver transplants; it matters for the same reason we feel a grim sort of satisfaction when pedophiles are chemically castrated. People who make self-destructive choices which result in their own annihilation (be that physically or spiritually) are degenerate, in the purest most clinical sense of the word.
Therefore I hold that it is literally true that abortion is categorically immoral, strip away the varnish, gloss and embellishments of illusion and excuse and examine the thing as it is by it's own merits.
A person who has sex, with or without protection, must accept the potential consequences of this action. The same way a person who eats 5 big macs a day must accept obesity as the consequence of their actions. The same way heroin junkie who shares needles must accept AIDS as the consequences of their actions.
I see no reason on earth to legitimize such shameful things or to make excuses for them. Women who get abortions should be looked down on, the same way we look down on anyone who purposefully enters into a state of apoptosis.
There is no such thing as a pregnant virgin.
Does this mean abortion should be illegal? I personally think it should, but what does it matter? Really? There are plenty of immoral things which are perfectly legal. It's not illegal to drink one's self into a coma, it's not illegal to ride 40,000 miles of cock in college, it's not illegal to eat your own shit.
But no one should feel sympathy for, or attempt to legitimize or render unto subjectivity, the immorality of promiscuity, shit eating, or alcoholism. These things should be shamed, the people who engage in them should be made to feel bad about themselves.
Furry Fandom isn't illegal, but these people should be shamed and shunned, and made to feel inferior, because they are, they're disgusting creatures.
Women who get abortions should be made to feel the same way.
GG @Volkswรคtcher, you just advanced to level 2!
(โฏยฐโกยฐ๏ผโฏ๏ธต โปโโป
Fight me god damn it
Even if the abortion is to preserve her own life?
I am abhor abortion but I participate in performing them when they are toxic to the mother's continued existence.
I provide drugs toxic to the fetus to save a woman's life.
Unless the woman explicitly says otherwise, I will maintain an existent life over a potential one.
That's a completely different set of circumstances and I think it's reductive and Orwellian to describe them in the same breathe.
Murder is wrong, but if separating a retarded twin from his functional conjoined counterpart would kill the retard, even basic act-utility would say "go for it";
Although I would say that under at least some circumstances it would be better to let both the mother and the fetus die; clearly natural selection has spoken.
Or to put it succinctly, I don't think it's right or fair to present some iteration of the trolley problem; of course it would be morally correct to let.. say... a thousand homeless people die to save the life of an army general. Of course it would be morally right to let a hundred thousand kittens burn up to save one orphan from a burning building.
I think the two issues are mutually exclusive. Abortion, full stop; is morally different from medically necessary abortions. I think both issues need their own conversation.
Furries and women who get abortions should be treated the same way
But the punishment should be death for getting an abortiona and death for being a furry
Furries are gay
Abortion is a topic that is especially rife with false equivalencies. Imagine likening necessary abortions with ones done out of convenience.
GG @Cobra Commander, you just advanced to level 29!
What did I say that was false? @Cobra Commander
That was in response to DrYuriMom, not you
"Necesary abortion"
Wapow
71,774 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 267/288
| Next