Message from @rory
Discord ID: 685183856873439300
And of course, you can cross-reference the sources yourself.
These folks will drop their pants around their ankles and trust whatever squirts out of Trump's hole, but treat Wikipedia as some sort of left-wing propaganda tool
eh its an open source. best to treat it like the media. read, interpret, choose whether to take its word or cross-reference and get some other proof as well
(ofc should do the latter of the last two options)
Well, it's good to be skeptical of everything. Textbooks are FULL of inaccuracies, mistakes, and revisions.
Too bad there's no way for someone to edit them on the fly, eh?
That would be handy
;)
In any case, I agree that it shouldn't be taken as gospel
That said, when people reject Wikipedia as a source, 99.9% of the time they're Trumpsters and the like being weasley and dishonest.
There are things you can trust Wikipedia on and things you can’t. An article about a popular political figure? Someone might have altered that for their own ends
An article about the derivation of the feudal title “duke”? That’s probably fine
Especially since it matched what I already know to be true from other sources
You can’t trust it when it comes to dates
Anyone interested in the fall of the western empire and the rise of feudalism, Mike Duncan gets into it somewhat in the last episode of history of Rome: https://open.spotify.com/episode/6LHLVXMRj4zOfJd6bHUVmi?
Super fascinating stuff
daily reminder that im cute and ur cute too
xoxo
except jesushand
he's ugly
ya ur cute
Lmao u don't even know what i look like
ya i do
Ok tell me
ugly
Like a bitch
ha ha ha
I bet your ugly too
nope
im pretty
PROVE IT
nope
🦧
No proof or It ain't real
SHE ISN'T REAL
I’m a helicopter
Same ugh we're twinning
<:honk:583238347124637707>
Y’all kinda gay ngl
Imagine actually using the term asexual