Wow, for Stockholm police, flirting is prettttttty awkward....

@AussieAryan#2292 It's more than 5 try 19.5

Someone with a right wing view

someone with a left wing view

It's the people with both you gotta watch out for.

Who is that second one even meant for?

evul joo's

found out why sjw's don't like Asians, or at least Koreans, they must vote republican: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OCYT9Hew9ZU

I think it's like half and half with Asians, with younger being more prone to being Democrat

thats every race, its a human thing,

When you're young, you got nothing, so you want stuff, and thus stick with the people that say they wanna give you stuff,
Then you get older, and start to accumilate your own capital, and you're like "this is mine, get your own", and stick to the party that wants you to keep your stuff

https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/407763104542359552/431140060986081300/29598209_2055156571439651_2212656194676654446_n.png

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/407345200969547777/431158891276140556/image-7.png

Sorry @Grenade123 Asians don't vote majorty republican.

@Deleted User it was a joke your racist ass is too dense to get. Asians are lumped under white people in the eyes of regressives. You think they will keep voting democrate when they start pushing for Asains to be killed?

I'm curious who the "Other" category classify themselves as, and why they voted 1/3 for Trump.

The regressives have a point there though becase like White people Asians have a IQ higher than the 90's so they can maintain a functioning society and do well in the society unlike Blacks and Hispanics.

I think Mexico would be doing pretty well if not for their gang problem.

Presumably because of the same problem our law enforcement has: they can't just go in and root out the gangs.

Your right but you need to understant that they have a gang problem because of the large hispanic population.

I'm not gonna say why one way or another, you could be right, it could be something else. By all rights if Mexico were functioning "properly" given all the resources they have down there, they should have an amazing and thriving economy.

Plus, a lot of the cartels down there have a lot of money. If I remember, it's much the same problem we have here in the US where outside forces have a lot of money and influence over the government. In our case it's corporations and companies, whereas down there I think it's the cartels.

In fact, that's why I fully support the construction of the wall and much harsher immigration policies to keep illegal immigrants out.

"Youtube are great.. They sent me an ipod touch!" - Tim Pool

Yes, I think building the wall and keeping the illegals out would be the single greatest humanitarian thing we can do for Mexico.

I think were the US not being used as a 'pressure valve' to allow people to flee, people who would otherwise have risen up and overthrown their government by now, Mexico could very well have already been very different than it is today.

Basically, they need a second Mexican Revolution.

*tfw someone's been typing for about 10 minutes*

With the wealth thing why is Iceland wealthy fo most of there history all they had was a fishing industry, domestic farming industry and small scale tourism. They are wealthy becase of the people. Mexico has a large land area with lots of resources like oil, silver, copper, salt, fluorspar, iron, manganese, sulfur, phosphate, zinc, tungsten, molybdenum, mercury, gold, and gypsum but they are poor because the people have a lower average IQ. I agree that money is never good in the political system weather foreign or domestic and we need to de what we can to prevent it being a problem. Other majorty non-white countries in Latin America have similar problems with cartels and I agree that the war on durges is a cause of the problem problem but you need to ask yourslef why is Latin America so corrupt in the frist place. I think it's becase of the large non white population if you don't belive me it seems to be that the least corrupt countries are the whitest ones. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corruption_Perceptions_Index
I agree that illegal immigration is never a good thing for a country who ever if you kicked out all the illegals America will still be majorty non-white if present trends continue so you are still going to be greater mexico anyway. I don't see how having another Mexican revolution qould help even if the right people win whats to stop Mexico becoming shit again?

Well, real quick about Iceland: much of their wealth is through imports. In fact, just in January of 2018 alone imports accounted for about 42% of the nation's wealth.

But I'm not an economist, that was just the first thing that came to mind.

And I was only talking about the Mexican crisis in a void, not how that problem spills over into the US, because I see the illegal immigration as a symptom of that. I wasn't even contesting your claim about Mexico also possibly being bad because of the populations average IQ, and even acknowledged that "you could be right" about it.
I was just saying that building the wall and strengthening immigration policies *and enforcement* is probably the best thing we can do for Mexico and give them the best opportunity to reform. Now, if we did all of that and they still did nothing about their situation, then it's safe to say it's entirely on them at that point.

The issue of the hispanic population growing in the US I'm not denying exists, I just for the sake of the conversation about Mexico was just separating it for right now.

I was just saying that the situation in Mexico is so bad right now that there is nothing that can fix it at this point other than just a full-scale revolution, that's all.

Whether they actually conduct such a revolution is entirely up to them.

gotta anneal brass tonight

Wait, if wealth is imported that means Iceland is selling stuff, right?

...like I said, I'm not an economist...

Well, that's the US public education system for you right there. lol

Even back in my day they were more worried about teaching kids about how great islam was than more practical stuff.

Like economics.

My point with Iceland was that a country can be wealthy without many natural resources. I think another good exsample is Japan which like Iceland doesn't have many natural resources and has natural disasters every few years or so and dosen't even grow enough food to feed themsleves but because they Japanes IQ is so high they are successful.
As I said earlier I agree that illegal immigration is not a good thing I wouldn't care if it was illegal Canadian immigration or Rusian it would still be bad for America. I have to dissagree with you that a revolution would help Mexico no system of government tried in Mexico has made it anywhere as prosperous as Texsa. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_between_U.S._states_and_countries_by_GDP_(nominal)
Mexico will never be as prospeous untill the Mexican people improve.

Mexico would be even worse off were it not for the huge amount of money that people send from the US to Mexico--more than $26 billion during Jan-Nov 2017 http://money.cnn.com/2018/01/02/news/economy/mexico-remittances/index.html

Basically, "Mexico would be worse off if it weren't leeching off of the US's economy."

That's pretty evident.

I'd rather Mexico be a viable country and trade partner than one that is practically being subsidized by the United States and dragging us down with them.

Very true mate but you have to rember that alot of hispanics want to regain the forma Mexican territories it has lost to America to either rejoin Mexico or create a new country and with demographic trends I don't see how you will stop them.

I wouldn't say "alot" believe that (I am just guessing though) but there is a determined group that do agree to the whole Aztlan movement: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aztl%C3%A1n#Use_by_the_Chicano_movement

@JadenFrostwolf Whether you like it or not America is already subsidizing Mexico and it's still shit. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/01/26/us-aid-320-million-mexico-wall-trump-specialists-backfire/97103024/

Yeah.
Well, whether it be from an active coordinated effort or through sheer coincidence, the effect is going to be the same: those states/territories are going to become majority hispanic.

California is leading the way

(into the shitter)

Both demographically and econonically/politically

( i butchered that spelling)

Again, though, that doesn't detract from my point that I'd rather Mexico be a legitimate country with it's own flourishing economy and an actual trade partner and just justifies that desire.

But that's just not gonna happen without massive changes, changes which I don't see as likely to happen 'on their own.'

I would agree with that. They should sink or swim on their own. Unfortunately if they do fail then nothing short of a solid wall from Pacific to Gulf would prevent a tidal wave of people coming north

@JadenFrostwolf The only way that could happen if Mexico had a better population and a homogeneous population.

Mexico is pretty homogeneous, isn't it?

It's a blending of natives and Spanish with a smattering of other groups in small numbers thrown in

https://www.statista.com/statistics/275439/ethnic-groups-in-mexico/

But yeah, I think the main reason there has not been a revolution by now is because people can flee into the US. If there is an out from a bad situation, people will take it; though, if someone is cornered and trapped, they will fight or submit, and under such circumstances people will only submit for so long.

For example, there is (or at least was) a small group of blonde haired, blue eyed Mennonites living there

I wasn't aware of the varied ethnicities in Mexico.

We can all agreee with you there Jaden. The Mexicans need to stay in Mexico.

I do know that the 'natives' of the land before the Spanish arrived still resided there in small numbers... I think the Aztecs? They were very distinct from the Mexicans because they were far shorter. You could tell them apart just by looking at them.

I didn't know about the other ethnicities, though.

Interesting.

But yeah, I'm fully aware of the racial displacement going on in the SW right now. I grew up in it.

I saw first-hand as neighborhoods turned into ghettos and garbage dumps.

I know detractors will scream, "ANECDOTE!! ANECDOTE!! HISSS!!", but I just don't care. lol

That doesn't mean it's not happening.

I grew up in Chicago and saw the same sort of thing. neighborhoods went through cycles-nice neighborhoods turned bad and some bad neighborhood gentrified and turned around. Chicago might be the one off though. Detroit is the other extreme

I specifically remember my father one day telling me that I'm not allowed to wear red or blue shirts anymore, because I might accidentally catch the attention of the opposite 'gang' and they might think I'm part of their enemy's tribe.

Out of nowhere.

It was an uncommon thing *not* to hear gunshots in the middle of the night where I grew up.

Halsey is on purple dragon

and

Uh oh. lol

it's now OK with ethno nationalism on some level

it's really strange

It's funny how that keeps happening.

I never heard gunshots in the neighborhood I lived in but 2 miles west in the neighborhood that I went to school in there were alot of gangs and they were not shy in making their presence known

I've listened to all sorts of folks argue it

and I never buy into it

Now both neighborhoods are in the upper income/upper real estate priced areas of Chicago

Not sure why Halsey is willing to bend over to it

Because there's nothing to 'buy into', it works.

Just about every country on the planet before 1965 was an ethnostate, including the US, be it through function or active enforcement of it.

Not the US really, heavy majority, sure; but it depends on where you bend the leaf as to who falls into what section

i.e. hatred of the irish, scottish, krauts

etc

Before the immigration reform of 1965, the immigration policy specifically named white people. You can't really get more outright 'ethnostate' than that.

italians

Sure, but, everyone always finds some difference on some level.

If were were to inherently say that ethnostates work, why are there so many examples of countries with homogeneous genetics that enter into civil wars?

Do we draw some IQ line and say, ok, here ethnostates work, below here they do not?

money only gives people the power to do what they want, it doesent make what they want to do any better. throwing money at foreign countrys without having power to influince the direction those countrys take that money in simply makes that countys problems more expensive. there were good happy communitys during the neolithic. i should also point out that nontransparent control offered along side subsides only works in specific ways, what america does when it controls south american countrys via the cia doesent classify as the kind of direction needed to go along side subsides, at best what it does is protect moneyed intrests

I'm trying to understand what you mean.
"Civil war exists, therefore ethnostates don't work"?

civil wars occure when communication breaks down and segragation isint an option. so id argue that civil war exists where ethnostates dont

For sure, yeah, but like I said, I'm trying to even wrap my head around his argument in the first place.

The civil war part seemed to come out of left field. lol

well consitering my paragraph was in responce to comments 50+ ago im probably behind the loop 😛

I mean there is a direct correlation between the average IQ of a state's population and the functionality of that state.

im not sure i agree

does the usa to you seem like the bastion of high functionality?

Compared to the other countries of the world, especially non-westernized ones, then yes.

which other countries?

Iran, Brazil, Egypt, etc.

There does come an exception when a country is rich in a single resource, but most of these countries are often under the control of a tyrannical government which controls that resource.

Like Saudi Arabia. Aside from their oil reserves they don't have much else going on for them.

Which country was it that had a sharp increase in slavery? Libya? Liberia? One of those.

swedan, uk, france, spain, and china have higher listed iq than the uk

usa*

Yes?

China aside, those countries are also getting flooded with migrants and refugees from the middle east.

which is a symptom and not a cause of all their problems

Agreed, yeah, but the problem being a bunch of open border ideologues getting into positions of power.

Like Merkel.

so not stunning functionality

they arnt ideologues by the way

I didn't say they were pristine, but they would be far better off without crowds of middle-eastern migrants leeching off of their welfare systems and committing a bunch of crime.

they are neolibs

about as far from ideolistic as you can get besides nihilism

The migrant crisis is about an eternal force coming into these countries and ruining them, but these countries functioned just fine on their own without being sabotaged. That's not a weakness of the system or the country's populace, just those that hold the reins.

Besides, aren't these countries part of the EU, which is a body unelected by the populace of it's member countries?

the people whom dictate the direction of the governments of those nations and their economic union were elected by someone and were there before those people directed the nations to accept uncontroled immigration

Ultimately, those people made the decisions that they did once they were elected in.

Hindsight is always 20/20.

Well, almost always...

so not very functional toward the well being of the nation

dispite the high iq

I was just using a civil war as an example of where ethnostates might fail to properly correct for cultural issues that run deeper than mere race. It's a pretty big one and no, I'm not explicitly stating that no ethnostate can have a civil war. Just an example of instabilities that do not require multiculturalism as a factor.

The smaller ones are really pretty hard to point out, some are easier

Well, yeah, people will always have a reason to fight amongst each other, you can't change that.

i think ethno can have its defintion broadened beyond race in order to cover for other cultural problems, consitering ethnicity isint race and ethnicity actually does cover culture

Isn't an ethnostate supposed to mean less infighting?

Less, but not 'none.'
Violence is going to occurr one way or another.

Keep in mind I did have the african countries in my head when I was establishing this but it can extend to pretty much any race

A monoracial society has less infighting than a multiracial society.

I just don't accept that a society wasn't functioning properly just because it was sabotaged by a few from within.

an ethnostate is supose to use segregation where communication breaks down and war wishes to be avoided when a problem is deemed to be caused from a lack of social coesion of its population

A few from within?

The jews.

People that are pro open-borders like Trudeu, Merkel, communists, etc.

OK but it's clearly not just them

There are large swaths of the population that don't understand that a massive influx of economic migrants is detrimental

Minus the sabotage, were the country allowed to carry on like normal, there is little to no risk of collapse; in fact, the fact that it took something like the migrant crisis to actually bring these countries down to the risk of breaking down is pretty telling in and of itself.

If it was the majority would you call it "A Few from within"?

in theory a monoracial society would have less differences in the population in order to cause conflict with eachother, but just the same europe has been at war with itself for 10 thousand years

It's not the majority.

The thing is Jews have promoted open borders and multiculturalism.

How much of the German population actually supported the Nazis during their rise to power? 3%? Well, that didn't stop them now, did it?

What if it was close to a majority? What if it was 20 percent? Is that still a few?

thing is europeans have adopted open borders and multiculturalism

What's the `few` when we're talking about emotionally driven cocksuckers making shitty decisions?

I agree a vangard leads a country not the majorty it just depends who leads the country.

whos the fool, the fool or the fool who follows the fool?

yes

Those that are actually in the positions of power capable of effecting the change they want, I would say.

The population is, though, by petitioning the gov't that they want to cry over haji babies

I agree that the 'silent majority' is useless because they're inactive though, yes.

Now keep in mind, I don't have the exact stats for that shitty decision, but I do for /other/ shitty decisions.

@Arch-Fiend That's becuase jews pressure the leades to.

There are even some decisions that legislators will firewall no matter what

Such as federal legalization of dope

Yeah.

Swaths of people have been petitioning the feds for fuckin' /years/ and jack shit gets done.

I would say 'they need to vote in different people then', but we both know this isn't going to happen so long as the majority is politically inactive and uneducated.

I think the polls showed that it was something like 70% of the population thinks the DEA's current stance on it is retarded

@Ghostler I dissagree if you put it in a certin why the goverment can be forced to do anything just look at the 1965 immigration act.

Well, we don't vote on it, we vote for people who vote for people who then vote on it

And then typically the people we vote for don't vote on the things we want them to vote for.

lots of folks don't understand the intricate nature of things and are relatively single issue

So it comes down to "but we know more than the plebs."

This sums up the American political system.

it's just the way things go when you're dealing with the populace at large. They aren't really stupid per-se, they just don't have the time to grasp every single consequence

Yeah.

I know this is really bad/convenient timing, but I need to go to work in a bit.

I wish I could say I would like to carry on the conversation when I get back, but I'll probably forget half of the things talked about here before I even finish working. lol

If it's still going on I'll try to remember.

see you latter mate.

I'm probably lower on the IQ range. kek

I've got work too so forgetabout it furfag

Perhaps later

https://images-ext-2.discordapp.net/external/T_Qt75gffPyacZCKXCNX5Fs5GN8nZWGYfuFZuMOeyP8/https/i.redd.it/6bol40un7xp01.jpg?width=469&height=463

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/the-truth-about-the-youtube-shooter-she-wasnt-muslim-and-didnt-care-about-the-nra

does that make _any_ difference?

what's next? She also wasn't a vegan because she ate eggs or something? 😏

was she confirmed as trans though?

She's not trans

She's just Aryan

Not much difference tho

80 cases annealed

yay

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/317172922999635968/431293944714756097/6787b1ef0033ad5-a-nw-p.jpg

TALK

ROOM

FOUR

lol

If I could talk I would

i actually cant talk lol

headset bork

i only had the fucker for 3 months

get a new cupcake

my happy little brass

I extended it 6 thousandths in the best cases

I got back like 50 pieces for actual use

it's wonderful

im going to MIT for 1 day lmao

prob wont have any time to do anything

stupid accelerator y u no reimburse flight

what the fuck would a person do at MIT one day

networking mostly

except maybe wander around the place

sounds tedious

we're meeting these ppl https://www.playlabs.tv/

jewry of the highest scale

FPGA accelerated jewry

nanosecond stock trade jewry

housing market jewry

EA jewry

nothing compared to this

you will all get jewed by our unstoppable force

international jewish communist conspiracy

geez y'all had a massive chat party whilst i was away

I got called a furry again. ✌

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/257828947272663041/431174145217134612/History-does-repeat-itself-after-all.jpg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qirljeHe898

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6DT2BuA8SAA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qC_QUU7pVBQ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a-K58yIbBik

was the problem her life?

I think so