you can only make rules for groups but you must account for individuals

That's a relatively fair answer.

See, the true way out of this is actually about as hard as ethno-nationalism, but far more fair.

Hold everyone to the same standard

and leave the exit door open.

i think most people will adopt the native culture under normal cercomstances, however this is not the case in extreme cercomstances which you as a social engineer cannot always predict and can not always prevent.

mass immigation is an example of an extreme cercomstance

I mean, Our pal Aryan over there says we should just *force* everyone not white to leave.

another example is whatever the fuck is going on with black people in america

I don't think it's NECESSARY to do so.

i would disagree with his move

except maybe in europe for anyone whos part of the mass immigation there

because those huge population spikes will become cultural problems over time

just ending immigration there wont solve those, but id also be willing not to solve those for a compramise of shutting down immigration

see personally im just anti-immigration in general with no personal reguards for identity politics

As for the US, let's say you were to drop the safety net, to a degree.

Actually allow for a true failure state for individuals.

Regardless of race

failure state?

As in, no comfort in welfare.

interesting the first thing that came to my mind with failure state was ironicly creating a state for people who dont want to be american but also dont wanna live anywhere else 😛

I mean, that's also a possibility.

A far more realistic one.

If we could bring Federalism back to full force

Instead of waging these battles in the federal government

you mean actually have state rights again?

states could actually experiment with socialism if they so choose.

i was actually thinking about that earlier today. i have a theory that the evolution of information media has lead to the greater unionization of people in the united states and abroad because the speed of information has increased and now you know what your neighbers are doing and people have grown a tendency to push their ideology any way they can so use federal powers to supress ideologys elsewhere in the country even through the state laws there dont actually effect them. and this has lead to the homogenization of the united states but also a polerization of politics

Isn’t this California?

california isint socialist they are decadent

Things I'm trying to subvert with a state-based media company for 200, trebek.

Yea but they basically just ignore the federal government and do whatever they want

It's funny how right I think that is, Arch.

only good thing about them, unfortunately what they do and want is diplorible and selfish

they have like a huge fraction of our countrys economy

thats why they can do that

but they arnt socialist, they love capitalism under the facade

corporatism and capitalism are two different things.

Capitalism empowers the citizen.

if they went socialist they would give more power to the working class and that just wouldent suit them

I do have to agree though, it’s pretty amazing listening to Americans tell people of other nations how they should live, and listening to people from Europe, Australia, & Asia telling me how I should want to live

It’s quite amusing

In capitalism in it's truest form, the value you bring to society is directly converted into currency, which is the power to influence said society.

capitalist corporatism is an extention of capitalism though that simply is one of the means of businesses being privilaged above citiziens

it undermines the democracy but it is still capitalistic

Its not different from socialism taken to its extreme. Under extreme corporatism, the control lies with the corporations, under socialism, the government.

Any book recommendations.

not looking for shitpost ( i sort of wish there was a general chat).

Expecting people in 2018 to read

chances are i would use an audiobook

https://i.imgur.com/AEqnKlE.jpg

Its a joke, not a dick, dont take it so hard.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eMYoqJRf458

Depends on what you're looking for.

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/419595025396269058/447539322678149131/Inkedakoni_rheine_veight_and_jimmy_LI.jpg woops

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ds4iwL_HrT8

the above statement contradicts the below statement the explaination for the below statement can be found when you compare the populations in whole numbers. technically there were more african americans were slave owners than white european americans that were slave owners too. technicly there were more americans with native american heritage who were slave owners than there were of the americans without any native americian heritage. however. purely european heritage americans were of all slave owners the majority compared to other ethnicitys who owned slaves at the time. meaning of slave owners the majority were ethnic european americans

@Deleted User that is a false statement

Lads if you read the source sighted you will see that it is true. I know it's hard to believe but jews dominated slavery in America.

http://www.solargeneral.org/wp-content/uploads/library/Slavery/Who-Brought-the-Slaves-to-America.pdf

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Aa3Wu6ocV0

https://archive.org/details/WeThoughtTheyWereWhiteDontellJackson

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ddg9o4dU0AAGuCD.jpg

@Deleted User so to support your arguement you bring up something unrelated and your being very ignorenent if you dont realize how "78% of slave owners were ethnic jews" and "40% of the jewish population are slave owners" would mean that 40% of the jewish population accounted for 78% of the slave owning population. if we take the census of 1860 from here http://www.civil-war.net/pages/1860_census.html with the 393,975 slave holders, and compare it too https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Jews_in_the_United_States#Current_situation the jewish population of the united states during 1860 of 150000, it would mean that only 40% of 150000 owned slaves but somehow 78% of 393,975. these numbers contradict eachother. infact only if every jewish person in america owned slaves they wouldent event account for 50% of the slave owning population, they would only account for 38%

maths is hard sometimes

he did say he is dyslexic, but im going to blame lazyness

also this https://books.google.com/books?id=1ySu0sQRv-MC&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false

@Arch-Fiend Bruh... who do you think was running the census.....?

It's noses all the way down. o_o

Holy shit. Mister Metokur is running a stream with all the IBS leaders, hashing out beef. It's an absolute dumpster fire.

https://i.imgur.com/GIT2qzo.jpg

Lots of teeth for a 6 month old.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSItmeavrEE

"You can lose weight in lots of ways that aren't very good for you. Smoking cigarettes ... chemotherapy ... getting profoundly depressed ... I don't recommend those approaches."

ah, a professer (actually doesent say anything) debunks. i guess it doesent take much to debunk anymore.

i find it ironic that its a video of people requesting studys, a man saying he cant provide studys, and then the video doesent site any studys except appealing to authority

a diet purely of meat will reduce your lifespan, just as a diet purely of vegitables

difference genetic groups of humans also have different neutritional needs and adaptations to withdraw neutrition from different sources such as the european digestive track which hosts lactic bacteria that can break down milk products after the european matures, or the east asian long gut which is 50% longer than that of other ethnic groups that enables them to digest rice more thuroughly and extract more calorys