Do you make your laws rigid, and in opposition to the outliers?

At what point is the cutoff of majority?

51%? 75%? are the bottom 25% the problem? the bottom 10%?

If you remove those, the average shifts.

That's the essence of a purity spiral.

The point of culture is that it can be adopted.

if your not serving the average your not serving the most. but that actually isint the point of this. it can be argued you serve both the majority and minority by segragating them if the minority has less of a chance of being happy sharing the space of the majority regardless of what you do as a governemnt or a society and the happyness of the minority effects your majority

But as for the members of an ethnic group that don't share the same history, but do share the same values

Do you weigh their ethnicity as more important as their values?

Do you judge them by the group, or by the individual?

you can only make rules for groups but you must account for individuals

That's a relatively fair answer.

See, the true way out of this is actually about as hard as ethno-nationalism, but far more fair.

Hold everyone to the same standard

and leave the exit door open.

i think most people will adopt the native culture under normal cercomstances, however this is not the case in extreme cercomstances which you as a social engineer cannot always predict and can not always prevent.

mass immigation is an example of an extreme cercomstance

I mean, Our pal Aryan over there says we should just *force* everyone not white to leave.

another example is whatever the fuck is going on with black people in america

I don't think it's NECESSARY to do so.

i would disagree with his move

except maybe in europe for anyone whos part of the mass immigation there

because those huge population spikes will become cultural problems over time

just ending immigration there wont solve those, but id also be willing not to solve those for a compramise of shutting down immigration

see personally im just anti-immigration in general with no personal reguards for identity politics

As for the US, let's say you were to drop the safety net, to a degree.

Actually allow for a true failure state for individuals.

Regardless of race

failure state?

As in, no comfort in welfare.

interesting the first thing that came to my mind with failure state was ironicly creating a state for people who dont want to be american but also dont wanna live anywhere else 😛

I mean, that's also a possibility.

A far more realistic one.

If we could bring Federalism back to full force

Instead of waging these battles in the federal government

you mean actually have state rights again?

states could actually experiment with socialism if they so choose.

i was actually thinking about that earlier today. i have a theory that the evolution of information media has lead to the greater unionization of people in the united states and abroad because the speed of information has increased and now you know what your neighbers are doing and people have grown a tendency to push their ideology any way they can so use federal powers to supress ideologys elsewhere in the country even through the state laws there dont actually effect them. and this has lead to the homogenization of the united states but also a polerization of politics

Isn’t this California?

california isint socialist they are decadent

Things I'm trying to subvert with a state-based media company for 200, trebek.